Skip to content
Khosh Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Khosh Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2024still arriving
66
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$100kFood & Nutrition$10kHealth$8kEducation$8kHuman Services$8kPublic Benefit$5kInternational$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 66 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k64 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
$260
Median grant
7
States reached
$19k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$27,450
DARCHAI ISRAEL$10,900
AHAVAS CHAIM INC$7,200
TALMUDICAL ACADEMY$5,000
BEMORE GIVING$5,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH CENTER OF EASTERN SHORE$4,760
JEWELS SCHOOL$4,000
AHAVAS SHALOM CONGREGATION$3,953
AHAVAS YISRAEL CHARITY FUND$3,600
EN OD MILVADO FOUNDATION INC$3,500
PERSIAN SHUL OF MARINE INS$3,125
SUBURBAN ORTHODOX CONGREGATION TORAS CHAIM$2,641
BNOS YISROEL OF BALTIMORE$2,601
Individual grant recipient$2,000
IMADI$1,475
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $511 → 11%RAJE USA: $232 → 20%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $86 → 11%EN OD MILVADO FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 20%EN OD MILVADO FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 20%ATIME: $72 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
NV
NJ
CT
CA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$127k · 30 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
48

Total granted

$127k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
-7%

Still filing today

33%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
ReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RABBI CHAIM KOWALSKY MEMORIAL AHAVAS YISRAEL FUND INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +5%
  • KH
    KEREN HATZEDAKA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $597 · revenue +10%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL TORAH INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $520 · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • HF
    HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • CO
    CONGREGATION OHR YISROEL
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
4
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
5
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
6
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
7
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
8
Rabbi Meir Baal Haness Charity of Jerusalem Inc
Philanthropy
9
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
10
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
11
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
12
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tomchei Tzedaka Corp; the most unlike its peers is Kingdom of Kindness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/36
Grantees still filing
13/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $28,980 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDARCHEI ISRAEL INC: $14,460 · OtherDARCHEI ISRAEL INCRABBI CHAIM KOWALSKY MEMORIAL AHAVAS YISRAEL FUND INC: $10,400 · OtherRABBI CHAIM KOWALSKY MEMORIAL AHAVAS YISRAEL FUND INCAHAVAS CHAIM INC: $10,164 · OtherAHAVAS CHAIM INCTALMUDICAL ACADEMY: $10,000 · OtherTALMUDICAL ACADEMYKEHILLAT CHOVEVEI TZION: $7,250 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH CENTER OF EASTERN SHORE: $5,620 · OtherTASHBAR: $5,461 · Other+86 more: $70,157 · Other+86 moreEN OD MILVADO FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $597 · Human Services+2 more: $304 · Human ServicesJEWELS SCHOOL INC: $7,000 · Education+1 more: $101 · EducationCHAI LIFELINE INC: $5,282 · Health+2 more: $111 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $1,000 · ReligionCultural Literacy Institute: $600 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BETH YITZHAK HALEVY TORAH CENTER: $260 · ReligionKEHILAT DERECH YESHARA INC: $253 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $198 · ReligionOHR CHADASH CONGREGATION INC DBA OHR CHADASH ACADEMY: $101 · Religion+2 more: $28 · ReligionALVIN S MINTZES HATZALAH OF BALTIMORE INC: $2,017 · Public Safety & DisasterImadi Inc: $1,975 · Community Improvement
Other$162,492Human Services$7,901Education$7,101Health$5,393Religion$2,440Public Safety & Disaster$2,017Community Improvement$1,975

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRABBI CHAIM KOWALSKY MEMORIAL AHAVAS YISRAEL FUND INC: $10,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWELS SCHOOL INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEN OD MILVADO FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $5,282 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALVIN S MINTZES HATZALAH OF BALTIMORE INC: $2,017 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetImadi Inc: $1,975 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $597 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL TORAH INC: $520 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BETH YITZHAK HALEVY TORAH CENTER: $260 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRAJE-USA INC: $232 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE BIKUR CHOLIM INC: $216 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Teen Advancement Program Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShoresh Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KAHILAS KAMENITZ: $101 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA NESIVOS HATORAH INC: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHR CHADASH CONGREGATION INC DBA OHR CHADASH ACADEMY: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $90 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJust One Chesed Inc: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHASDEI MEIR INC: $57 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL TZEDAKAH INC: $49 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBINA STROKE AND BRAIN INJURY ASSISTANCE INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN TORAH VCHESED: $5 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVING HAND USA INC: $5 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RABBI CHAIM KOWALSKY MEMORIAL AHAVAS YISRAEL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWELS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds EN OD MILVADO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALVIN S MINTZES HATZALAH OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds Imadi Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Associated Jewish Cha…Crane Family Foundati…The Ojc FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…Center for Jewish Edu…The Hackerman Foundat…Volosov Family Founda…Foundation for the Pr…Gutman Family Foundat…The Adar FoundationThe Dennis Berman Fam…Jewish Communal Fund
Associated Jewish Charities of BaltimoreMD59.2× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Crane Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Center for Jewish Education Inc · The Hackerman Foundation Inc · Volosov Family Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Preservation & Perpetuation of Torah Laws & Customs · Gutman Family Foundation Inc · The Adar Foundation · The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Khosh Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Khosh Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Jewels School Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 114 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Khosh Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home