Skip to content

· Private foundation

KHC Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$215k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$200kHealth$113kYouth Development$111kArts & Culture$105kCrime & Legal$100kEnvironment$87kAnimals$72kEducation$71kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $203k
$22,563
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BEEVILLE INC$22,563
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC$22,563
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$22,563
SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM$22,563
BOBWHITE BRIGADE$22,563
WWP INC - WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC$22,563
SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS INC$22,563
FOREVER FOUNDATION FOR TEXAS WILDLIFE INC DBA TEXA$22,563
THE SALVATION ARMY - SAN ANTONIO$22,563
TEXAS 4 H YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$6,000
TEXAS 4-H$3,000
TEXAS 4-H$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $23k → 11%FOREVER FOUNDATION FOR TEXAS WILDLIFE INC DBA TEXA: $23k → 7%SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS INC: $23k → 10%TEXAS 4-H: $3k → 13%THE SALVATION ARMY - SAN ANTONIO: $23k → 16%SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM: $23k → 17%TEXAS 4-H: $3k → 19%TEXAS 4 H YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $6k → 22%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BEEVILLE INC: $23k → 29%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $23k → 17%STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $19k → 11%BOBWHITE BRIGADE: $23k → 7%SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS INC: $19k → 10%TEXAS 4-H: $3k → 13%THE SALVATION ARMY - SAN ANTONIO: $19k → 16%SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM: $20k → 17%TEXAS 4-H: $3k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BEEVILLE INC: $19k → 29%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $19k → 17%BOBWHITE BRIGADE: $19k → 7%SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS INC: $18k → 10%TEXAS 4-H: $3k → 13%THE SALVATION ARMY - SAN ANTONIO: $18k → 16%SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM: $19k → 17%TEXAS 4-H: $3k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BEEVILLE INC: $13k → 29%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $18k → 17%FOREVER FOUNDATION FOR TEXAS WILDLIFE INC DBA TEXA: $19k → 7%SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS INC: $15k → 10%THE SALVATION ARMY - SAN ANTONIO: $15k → 16%SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM: $18k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15k → 17%FOREVER FOUNDATION FOR TEXAS WILDLIFE INC DBA TEXA: $18k → 7%SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS INC: $13k → 10%THE SALVATION ARMY - SAN ANTONIO: $14k → 16%SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM: $13k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $14k → 17%BOBWHITE BRIGADE: $18k → 7%SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS INC: $13k → 10%THE SALVATION ARMY - SAN ANTONIO: $13k → 16%SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM: $13k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $13k → 17%BOBWHITE BRIGADE: $15k → 7%THE SALVATION ARMY - SAN ANTONIO: $13k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $13k → 17%FOREVER FOUNDATION FOR TEXAS WILDLIFE INC DBA TEXA: $15k → 7%FOREVER FOUNDATION FOR TEXAS WILDLIFE INC DBA TEXA: $13k → 7%BOBWHITE BRIGADE: $13k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$918k · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$918k
$0

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentMembership BenefitHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $113k · revenue +99%
  • ST
    SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I
    6× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +26%
  • SA
    SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +45%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Texas State Troopers Association

    The mission of the association is to improve and enhance the lives, careers, benefits, and conditions of the members and to improve the efficiency of all commissioned officers of law enforcement in general.

    —
    2
    State Guard Association of Texas

    Provide financial assistance to soldiers

    Public Benefit
    3
    Texas State Rifle Association Foundation Inc
    —
    4
    Texas Tribune Inc

    The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

    Education
    5
    Texas 635

    To provide immediate funds and family services.

    Human Services
    6
    Texas Dps Troopers Foundation Inc

    The texas dps troopers foundation's purpose is to support to texas department of public safety commissioned officers, communication personnel, and forensic scientists by providing financial assistance in times of emergency need, survivor…

    Human Services
    7
    Disabled American Veterans of Texas Service Foundation
    Human Services
    8
    Texas Ranger Association Foundation

    Support active and retired texas rangers and immediate family members through scholarships, financial assistance, and operational support in service to the citizens of texas; preserve and perpetuate the history and heritage of the texas…

    —
    9
    Texas Municipal Police Association Charities

    The support and management of any charitable, education or literary undertakings and in furtherance of any such undertakings, to receive and maintain a fund of funds of real or personal property, or both. the corporation will not conduct…

    Employment
    10
    Texas National Guard Family Support Foundation

    To provide assistance to texas national guard soldiers and their families during times of need.

    Public Benefit
    11
    Travis County Sheriffs Officers Association

    To promote benevolent, education, charitable, civic, patriotic and franternal activities among its members. to improve working conditions of members.

    —
    12
    Dallas Police Helicopter Foundation
    Public Safety & Disaster
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheriffs Association of Texas; the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of Beeville Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    7/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE SALVATION ARMY: $113,339 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYFOREVER FOUNDATION FOR TEXAS WILDLIFE INC DBA TEXA: $86,914 · OtherFOREVER FOUNDATION FOR TEXAS WILDLI…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BEEVILLE INC: $54,664 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BEEVILLE INCTEXAS 4-H: $30,000 · OtherTEXAS 4-HST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $113,339 · HealthST JUDE CHILD…SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I: $105,014 · Arts & CultureSOUTH TEXAS …SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $99,514 · Membership BenefitSHERIFFS ASS…TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION: $58,183 · EducationTEXAS DEPART…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $41,331 · EducationSTEPHEN SILL…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $86,914 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WA…Bobwhite Brigade: $86,914 · EnvironmentBobwhite B…TEXAS 4-H YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION I: $42,000 · Youth Development
    Other$284,917Health$113,339Arts & Culture$105,014Membership Benefit$99,514Education$99,514Human Services$86,914Environment$86,914Youth Development$42,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $113,339 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I: $105,014 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $99,514 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $86,914 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBobwhite Brigade: $86,914 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetTEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION: $58,183 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BEEVILLE INC: $54,664 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTEXAS 4-H YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION I: $42,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $41,331 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
    • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I ↗
    • Who funds SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS ↗
    • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
    • Who funds Bobwhite Brigade ↗
    • Who funds TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BEEVILLE INC ↗
    • Who funds TEXAS 4-H YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION I ↗
    • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization KHC Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from KHC Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
    • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to KHC Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to KHC Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on KHC Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph