· Private foundation
KHC Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $203k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS INC | $22,563 |
| WWP INC - WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC | $22,563 |
| STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $22,563 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY - SAN ANTONIO | $22,563 |
| SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM | $22,563 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC | $22,563 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BEEVILLE INC | $22,563 |
| FOREVER FOUNDATION FOR TEXAS WILDLIFE INC DBA TEXA | $22,563 |
| BOBWHITE BRIGADE | $22,563 |
| TEXAS 4 H YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| TEXAS 4-H | $3,000 |
| TEXAS 4-H | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 57% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC7× · 2019–2025 · $113k · revenue +99%- STSOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I6× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +26%
- SASHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS6× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +45%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the association is to improve and enhance the lives, careers, benefits, and conditions of the members and to improve the efficiency of all commissioned officers of law enforcement in general.
Provide financial assistance to soldiers
The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…
To provide immediate funds and family services.
The texas dps troopers foundation's purpose is to support to texas department of public safety commissioned officers, communication personnel, and forensic scientists by providing financial assistance in times of emergency need, survivor…
Support active and retired texas rangers and immediate family members through scholarships, financial assistance, and operational support in service to the citizens of texas; preserve and perpetuate the history and heritage of the texas…
The support and management of any charitable, education or literary undertakings and in furtherance of any such undertakings, to receive and maintain a fund of funds of real or personal property, or both. the corporation will not conduct…
To provide assistance to texas national guard soldiers and their families during times of need.
To promote benevolent, education, charitable, civic, patriotic and franternal activities among its members. to improve working conditions of members.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheriffs Association of Texas and the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of Beeville Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I ↗
- Who funds SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Bobwhite Brigade ↗
- Who funds TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BEEVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS 4-H YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION I ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization KHC Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to KHC Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to KHC Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.