Skip to content
Khandekar Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Khandekar Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$70kReligion$49kArts & Culture$25kInternational$18kHealth$11kEducation$10kCrime & Legal$2k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$205k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FAITH: $4k → 6%FAITH: $2k → 6%FAITH: $1k → 6%FAITH: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$67k · 4 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
13

Total granted

$67k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+13%

Still filing today

75%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthReligionPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2023 · $28k
  • NA
    NORTH AMERICAN BANGLADESHI ISLAMIC COMMUNITY INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $24k
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL POLICY AND UNDERSTANDING
    2× · 2019–2020 · $8k · revenue -1%

Funded once

  • UP
    UNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +42%
  • UP
    UNITY PRODUCTION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • T
    TISA
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
2
Tvislaamaa

To spread islamic values to the globe through media

Arts & Culture
3
Wisdom Islamic Studies and Education Inc
Religion
4
Foundation for Islamic Scholarship and Teaching
Education
5
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
6
Islamic Relief Usa

Islamic relief usa provides relief and development in a dignified manner regardless of gender, race, or religion, and works to empower individuals in their communities and give them a voice in the world.

International
7
The American Islamic Forum for Democracy

Aifd's mission is to advocate for the preservation of the founding principles of our u.s. constitution, liberty, and freedom, through the separation of mosque and state. public engagement program provides education to the general public on…

International
8
Dallas Islamic Foundation
Religion
9
Muslim Americans in Public Service

MAPS is a national non-partisan, nonprofit network of professionals and organizations that aim to create an enabling ecosystem for Muslim American public servants to thrive both personally and professionally. Our mission is to support the…

Community Improvement
10
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
11
The Islamic Society of Southern California
Religion
12
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary; the most unlike its peers is Sugar Run 5K. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $27,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITY PRODUCTION FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherUNITY PRODUCTION FOUNDATIONTISA: $10,000 · OtherTISAMETHODIST HEALTCARE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherMETHODIST HEALTCARE FOUNDATIONISNA: $10,000 · OtherISNAIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientISNA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $5,500 · Other+2 moreUNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · ReligionUNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATIONNORTH AMERICAN BANGLADESHI ISLAMIC COMMUNITY INC: $23,940 · ReligionNORTH AMERICAN BANGLADESHI IS…ISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMUSLIM AID AMERICA: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterINSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL POLICY AND UNDERSTANDING: $8,000 · InternationalFoundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary: $7,478 · Human ServicesMethodist Healthcare Foundation: $5,000 · HealthSUGAR RUN 5K: $500 · HealthTAYBA FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$103,000Religion$48,940Public Safety & Disaster$10,000International$8,000Human Services$7,478Health$5,500Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL POLICY AND UNDERSTANDING: $8,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFoundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary: $7,478 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMUSLIM AID AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMethodist Healthcare Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTAYBA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUGAR RUN 5K: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sterling Charitable G…American Muslim Commu…The Chicago Community…Ge Aerospace Foundati…The Pfizer Foundation…Verizon FoundationRenaissance Charitabl…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…
Sterling Charitable Gift FundVA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sterling Charitable Gift Fund · American Muslim Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Khandekar Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Khandekar Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Khandekar Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Khandekar Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Khandekar Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home