Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kerry Finnigan Rupright Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$218kRecreation & Sports$27kEducation$26kHuman Services$11kReligion$10kHealth$9kCommunity Improvement$689Public Benefit$511Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $34k
$3,100
Median grant
4
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ELKHART$33,710
RYAN'S PLACE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB GOSHEN$3,100
MAPLECREST COUNTY CLUB$750
WOUNDED WARRIOR$100
SALVATION ARMY$100
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WARRIOR'S WEEKEND: $100 → 16%GOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
IA
IN
CT
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$248k · 19 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
24

Total granted

$248k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+17%

Still filing today

21%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CANCER RESOURCES FOR ELKHART COUNTY INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +42%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION POST 210
    2× · 2018–2022 · $593 · revenue +31%
  • IS
    INDIANA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $156 · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • FA
    FARILFIELD ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • RP
    RYANS PLACE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -37%
  • MC
    MICHIANA CHRISTIAN CLUB FOOTBALL CORP
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Plymouth Canton Little League

Youth baseball and softball recreational league

—
2
American Legion Post 36 Inc

The american legion is a patriotic wartime veteran service organization dedicted to mentoring youth & the sponsorship of programs in our community promoting continued devotion to our servicemembers and veterans.

—
3
Summit City Sluggers Baseball Inc

The Summit City Sluggers Baseball Team is a developmental tool for athletes in the surrounding Fort Wayne area. This team is for athletes who have the goals for improving their skills against the best competition available in the area.

Recreation & Sports
4
Laporte County Leadership Inc

Leadership training

—
5
Portage Youth Baseball Club Inc
—
6
American Legion Post 170 Wadsworth

Promote the fraternal, benevolent & patriotic activities of the american legion. to support community and youth through charitable activities and to promote social and recreational activities for the american legion.

—
7
American Legion Conewago Post 329

Provide nbsp;community nbsp;service

—
8
Maumee Post No 320 American Le

To provide fellowship and assitace to all veterans so that they are not forgotten

Public Benefit
9
Michigan Heroes Museum

To teach & perpetuate the history of military accomplishments of citizens of the state of michigan and to maintain a museum for that purpose.

Arts & Culture
10
Eagle Lake Sports Association Inc

Our mission is to teach children baseball in a safe, fun and competitive environment. we try to do this in a way that not only creates baseball players, but lifelong fans. our goal is to never let cost get in the way of a child falling in…

Recreation & Sports
11
Soldotna Little League Inc

Little league baseball

—
12
Michigan Fallen Heroes Memorial

To honor the lives and service of michigan's police officers and firefighters who died in the line of duty through the creation and development of the michigan fallen heroes memorial.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Legion Post 210; the most unlike its peers is Mishawaka Troop Town Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB NAPPANEE: $112,085 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB NAPPANEEBOYS & GIRLS CLUB GOSHEN: $62,985 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB GOSHENBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ELKHART: $33,710 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ELKHARTIndividual grant recipient: $20,678 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGOSHEN PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMEN: $20,000 · OtherGOSHEN PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMEN+31 more: $43,044 · Other+31 moreCANCER RESOURCES FOR ELKHART COUNTY INC: $2,900 · HealthRYANS PLACE INC: $1,925 · HealthLOVEWAY INC: $600 · HealthGOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesWARRIORS WEEKEND: $100 · Human ServicesMICHIANA CHRISTIAN CLUB FOOTBALL CORP: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE E3 ROBOTICS CENTER INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentNMDP FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyMISHAWAKA TROOP TOWN INC: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$292,502Health$5,425Human Services$1,100Recreation & Sports$1,000Youth Development$1,000Philanthropy$1,000Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANCER RESOURCES FOR ELKHART COUNTY INC: $2,900 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRYANS PLACE INC: $1,925 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE E3 ROBOTICS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVEWAY INC: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 210: $593 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMISHAWAKA TROOP TOWN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINDIANA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC: $156 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC: $120 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWARRIORS WEEKEND: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANCER RESOURCES FOR ELKHART COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds RYANS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIANA CHRISTIAN CLUB FOOTBALL CORP ↗
  • Who funds THE E3 ROBOTICS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOVEWAY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 210 ↗
  • Who funds MISHAWAKA TROOP TOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Elkhart County IncIN21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · Welter Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kerry Finnigan Rupright Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kerry Finnigan Rupright Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kerry Finnigan Rupright’s filings →

    More from the funding graph