Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kermit G Phillips II Charitable Tr Aka Phillips Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$580k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$5.0MEducation$3.3MCommunity Improvement$1.0MEnvironment$750kInternational$740kHuman Services$165kCrime & Legal$25kOther$2.5M
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $488k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$138,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$50M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$580,000
SHIFT EDUCATION$500,000
GIVING TUESDAY INC$200,000
PANORAMA GLOBAL$138,000
LIFT OUR VOICES$100,000
PANORAMA GLOBAL$50,000
THE IMPACT$5,642
CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RAISE TEXAS: $40 → 10%BEHIND EVERY DOOR: $10k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $5k → 14%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREENSBORO INC: $150k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
CA
VA
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Kermit G Phillips II Charitable Tr Aka Phillips Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 70% of the giving stays in NC; read by stated purpose it is 65% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Kermit G Phillips II Charitable Tr Aka Phillips Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.6M · 14 repeat orgs$658k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$8.6M
$453k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+16%

Still filing today

64%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementInternationalCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AG
    ACTION GREENSBORO
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +36% · 38% of their budget
  • TP
    TANDEM PHILANTHROPIES FKA THE ARK FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1.0M · revenue ×20
  • SE
    SHIFT EDUCATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +602% · 71% of their budget

Funded once

  • UNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -14%
  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue -2%
  • GR
    GODLY RESPONSE TO ABUSE IN THE
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
2
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
3
Great Mn Schools

We believe that great schools are the cornerstone of a just and thriving community. ensuring that every child is able to attend a school that works is our moral and social imperative - our children deserve no less.

Education
4
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
5
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
6
Greenwood Project

Greenwood's mission is to create career pathways in the financial services industry for black and latino college students. we partner with companies to find equitable and inclusive solutions for recruitment, retention, and advancement. our…

Human Services
7
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
8
Greater Greenville Association of Realtors Inc

Providing standards, guidelines, and procedures to those members engaged in practice of the real estate profession

9
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
10
Global Scholars

Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.

11
Greater Winston-Salem Development Corp

To recruit new businesses to winston-salem and forsyth county in order to facilitate growth and economic diversification in the area.

Community Improvement
12
Gateway Research Park Inc

Gateway research park is a catalyst for university and private research, innovation, and economic development.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tandem Philanthropies Fka the Ark Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC — $3,565,100 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBOR…TANDEM PHILANTHROPIES FKA THE ARK FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyTANDEM PHILANTHROPIES FKA THE ARK FOUNDAT…UNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC — $250,000 · PhilanthropyGIVING TUESDAY INC — $200,000 · PhilanthropySHIFT EDUCATION — $1,000,000 · EducationSHIFT EDUCATIONSouthern Methodist University — $895,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist Universi…UNCG EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC — $640,918 · EducationUNCG EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION …UNION SQUARE CAMPUS INC — $600,000 · EducationUNION SQUARE CAMPUS INCGUILFORD EDUCATION ALLIANCE — $210,000 · EducationGUILFORD EDUCATION ALLIANCECOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GSO — $736,120 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION…YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC — $571,845 · OtherYOUTH VILLAGES FOUND…THE SALVATION ARMY — $400,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYGREENSBORO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC — $400,000 · OtherGREENSBORO CHILDREN'…LIFT OUR VOICES — $300,000 · OtherLIFT OUR VOICES+4 more — $99,142 · OtherACTION GREENSBORO — $1,000,000 · Community ImprovementNEW VENTURE FUND — $750,000 · EnvironmentPANORAMA GLOBAL — $740,000 · InternationalYoung Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc — $150,000 · Human ServicesBEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 · Human Services+2 more — $5,040 · Human ServicesGODLY RESPONSE TO ABUSE IN THE — $25,000 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$5,015,100Education$3,345,918Other$2,507,107Community Improvement$1,000,000Environment$750,000International$740,000Human Services$165,040Crime & Legal$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC — $3,565,100 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetACTION GREENSBORO — $1,000,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetTANDEM PHILANTHROPIES FKA THE ARK FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetSHIFT EDUCATION — $1,000,000 over 2y, 71% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $895,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $750,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL — $740,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetUNCG EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC — $640,918 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetUNION SQUARE CAMPUS INC — $600,000 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetGREENSBORO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC — $400,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC — $250,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetGUILFORD EDUCATION ALLIANCE — $210,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetGIVING TUESDAY INC — $200,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc — $150,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGODLY RESPONSE TO ABUSE IN THE — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAY YES TO EDUCATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAISE Texas — $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The VF FoundationDE19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The VF Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Edward M Armfield Sr Foundation I · Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation · The Joseph M Bryan Foundation · The Cemala Foundation Inc · Hillsdale Fund · Housing Opportunities Inc · Bell Foundation · Betty J and Robert P Williams Family Foundation · Ta Blue Bell Foundation Main

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kermit G Phillips II Charitable Tr Aka Phillips Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kermit G Phillips II Charitable Tr Aka Phillips Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kermit G Phillips II Charitable Tr Aka Phillips Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph