· Public charity
Keren Yehoshua V'Yisroel
To provide support for the study,teaching,practice, and dissemination of Torah studies and heritage from an Orthodox Jewish perspective.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $771,425 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,137,472 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,366,047 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $341k
- $250k+1 grant · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONGREGATION BAIS MEDRASH LETORAH INC | $400,000 |
| TORAT CHESED TRUST | $160,000 |
| FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM INC | $110,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINIC COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT | $71,425 |
| TORAH ANYTIMECOM INC | $15,000 |
| CONGREGATION BAIS HALEVY INC | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $518k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $1.2M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT TORAH STUDY
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $285k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT INC7× · 2017–2023 · $907k · revenue +78%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAAS AHARON INC3× · 2018–2021 · $412k · revenue +126%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC2× · 2017–2018 · $332k · revenue +155%
Funded once
- COCONGREGATION OHR SHRAGA DVERETSKYone grant, 2017 · $180k
- CGCONGREGATION GUR ARYEH INSTITUTEone grant, 2018 · $45k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YIKAR MORDECHAIgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +434% · 51% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
Education and religious activities and research
To further jewish education in israel
The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.
Furtherance of jewish education
Fostering jewish education and leadership.
Support institutions that are set up for prayer and the study of traditional jewish texts
To aid in the maintenance and development of the Rabbinical College Kol Torah of Jerusalem, Israel
Religious School
To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Rabbinical College Netiv Hadaat Inc and the most unlike its peers is TorahAnytimeCom Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAAS AHARON INC ↗
- Who funds AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC ↗
- Who funds TORAT CHESED TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE VOICE OF JEWISH EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM ↗
- Who funds THE JERUSALEM FUND INC ↗
- Who funds TorahAnytimeCom Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YIKAR MORDECHAI ↗
- Who funds YAD CHAYA INC ↗
- Who funds TORAH ORE SEMINARY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Malchus Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Fjc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Ays Tzedakah Foundation · Maalot · The Basch Family Foundation · Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Keren Yehoshua V'Yisroel funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.