· Public charity
Kentucky Health Departments Assn
To promote better health services, obtain and exchange information, to investigate problem areas and suggest solutions and to promote continuing education.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k27 grants · $69k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $224k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.6M
- $250k+2 grants · $608k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Martin County Health Department | $311,487 |
| Lincoln Trail District Health Department | $296,569 |
| Three Rivers Disrtrict Health Department | $220,899 |
| Breathitt County Health Department | $216,677 |
| Kentucky Association of Local Boards of Health | $210,000 |
| Marshall County Health Department | $165,898 |
| Hopkins County Health Department | $107,091 |
| Montgomery County Health Department | $97,569 |
| North Central District Health Department | $89,937 |
| Pike County Health Department | $79,136 |
| Gateway District Health Department | $75,830 |
| Jessamine County Health Department | $75,819 |
| Madison County Health Department | $70,762 |
| Franklin County Health Department | $67,635 |
| Kentucky River District Health Department | $64,379 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2020–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2020 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: West Virginia Local Health Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Kentucky Health Departments Assn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kentucky Health Departments Assn. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Kentucky Health Departments Assn’s filings →