Skip to content

· Public charity

Kentucky Corn Growers Association Inc

To be an innovative organization that provides benefits and services that meet the needs of our producers and members in a changing industry.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$420k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$6.1MScience & Tech$2.1MYouth Development$114kEnvironment$32kEducation$19kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $1,328,130, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,404,235 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $76,105 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION$419,500
US GRAIN COUNCIL$356,000
UK RESEARCH FOUNDATION$306,630
US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION$120,000
CLEMSON UNIVERISTY$50,000
US POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL$30,000
ILLINOIS CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION$20,000
KENTUCKY EXPOSITION FOUNDATION$10,000
KENTUCKY 4-H FOUNDATION$10,000
KENTUCKY FFA FOUNDATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CLEMSON UNIVERISTY: $50k → 16%WATERWAYS COUNCIL INC: $32k → 14%NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $473k → 11%US POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $30k → 14%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $120k → 12%ILLINOIS CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $20k → 11%KY AG & ENVI IN THE CLASSROOM: $10k → 9%KENTUCKY EXPOSITION FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%KENTUCKY FFA FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%INTER ASSOC OF LIONS CLUB: $6k → 17%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7k → 19%KY FFA FOUNDATION: $11k → 21%US GRAIN COUNCIL: $385k → 14%NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $447k → 11%US POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $30k → 14%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $120k → 12%KY AG & ENVI IN THE CLASSROOM: $10k → 9%KENTUCKY EXPOSITION FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%KENTUCKY FFA FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7k → 19%KY FFA FOUNDATION: $6k → 21%US GRAIN COUNCIL: $356k → 14%NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $420k → 11%US POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $25k → 14%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $100k → 12%KENTUCKY FFA FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%US GRAIN COUNCIL: $200k → 14%NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $409k → 11%US POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $25k → 14%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $100k → 12%US GRAIN COUNCIL: $194k → 14%NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $400k → 11%US POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $20k → 14%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $100k → 12%US GRAIN COUNCIL: $144k → 14%NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $400k → 11%US POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $20k → 14%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $100k → 12%US GRAIN COUNCIL: $140k → 14%NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $400k → 11%US POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $20k → 14%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $100k → 12%US GRAIN COUNCIL: $126k → 14%NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $400k → 11%US POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $20k → 14%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $100k → 12%US GRAIN COUNCIL: $126k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 80% of Kentucky Corn Growers Association Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Kentucky Corn Growers Association Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.2M · 11 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$8.2M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-14%

Still filing today

91%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +2%
  • UO
    University of Kentucky Research Foundation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +66%
  • US
    UNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $840k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • WC
    WATERWAYS COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $32k · revenue -14%
  • IA
    INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBS
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kentucky Center for Agriculture and Rural Development Inc

Facilitate agricultural and rural business development in kentucky by 1) providing leadership, educational, technical and financial resources and 2) improving the economic conditions of rural kentucky through promoting development of new…

Food & Nutrition
2
Kansas Corn Growers Association

To promote and improve the profitability of kansas corn farmers by developing and maintaining domestic and international markets to utilize kansas and us corn production.

Food & Nutrition
3
Kansas Grain and Feed Association

To advance and protect the common interest of its members through effective communication and education to its members, the public and government

—
4
American Dairy Association of Kentucky

Everything we do is market-focused and proactively promotes and protects the interests of the southeast dairy farm families.

—
5
Kentucky Farm Bureau Federation

Kentucky farm bureau is a grassroots organization dedicated to serving our membership family and their communities. as the voice of agriculture, we identify problems, develop solutions, promote economic success, and enhance the quality of…

—
6
Kentucky Association for Economic Development Inc

Our purpose is to educate, advocate and connect with our members on issues that are important to the economic development in the commonwealth of kentucky.

Community Improvement
7
Kentucky Forage & Grassland Council

To promote the use of forages as profitable, economical and environmentally sound agriculture through education, communication, and professional development of producers, scientists, educators and commercial representatives and through…

—
8
Kentucky Horticulture Council Inc

To promote and expand the horticultural enterprises in the state of kentucky, and to increase farmer profitability, improve infrastructure and provide technical assistance.

Food & Nutrition
9
Kentucky Bankers Association

To provide effective advocacy for the financial services industry both in kentucky and on a national level; to serve as a reliable and responsive source of information and education about areas of interest to the industry; and to provide a…

—
10
Us Grains Council

The u.s. grains council is dedicated to developing markets, enabling trade, and improving lives by fostering an inclusive organization of grain producers, agribusiness organizations, and international customers, while promoting free, fair,…

—
11
Kentucky Farm Bureau Education Foundation Inc

Provide financial grants for higher education and promote agricultural education in ky elementary and secondary schools.

—
12
Us Livestock Genetics Exports Inc

To administer and operate foreign market development and market access program activities as authorized by the united states department of agriculture, foreign agriculture service and commodity credit corporation.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kentucky 4H Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Waterways Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $3,347,750 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION+2 more: $40,000 · Food & NutritionUS GRAIN COUNCIL: $1,670,629 · OtherUS GRAIN COUNCILUNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INC: $840,000 · OtherUNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION I…USA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $190,000 · OtherUSA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL+5 more: $111,200 · OtherUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $2,004,385 · EducationUniversity of Kentucky Rese…+1 more: $13,000 · EducationKENTUCKY 4H FOUNDATION INC: $102,000 · Youth DevelopmentWATERWAYS COUNCIL INC: $32,348 · Environment
Food & Nutrition$3,387,750Other$2,811,829Education$2,017,385Youth Development$102,000Environment$32,348

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $3,347,750 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $2,004,385 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INC: $840,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetUSA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $190,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetKENTUCKY 4H FOUNDATION INC: $102,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetWATERWAYS COUNCIL INC: $32,348 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKENTUCKY AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE CLASSROOM INC: $20,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetKENTUCKY EXPOSITION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA AND ITS STATE ASSOCIATIONS & LOCAL CHAPTER: $18,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetKENTUCKY FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION INC: $17,200 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kentucky Corn Growers Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kentucky Corn Growers Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kentucky Corn Growers Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph