Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kenneth W Scott Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$586k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$701kInternational$600kEducation$566kReligion$455kArts & Culture$356kPublic Safety & Disaster$278kFood & Nutrition$158kHousing & Shelter$132kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $396k
$40,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$100,000
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC$75,000
SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATI$60,500
EUCLID PET PALS$60,000
SHORE HAVEN LUTHERAN CHURCH$50,000
LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF$50,000
LUTHERN EAST HIGH SCHOOL$40,000
WESTERN RESERVE HUMANE SOCIETY$35,000
EUCLID HUNGER CENTER$25,000
TENDER MERCIES INC$25,000
LAKE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS$25,000
PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE FOUNDAT$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATI: $61k → 13%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100k → 21%TENDER MERCIES INC: $25k → 16%EUCLID PET PALS: $60k → 17%DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $25k → 10%SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATI: $50k → 13%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100k → 21%TENDER MERCIES INC: $25k → 16%EUCLID PET PALS: $50k → 17%DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $25k → 10%SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATI: $50k → 13%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $50k → 21%TENDER MERCIES INC: $25k → 16%EUCLID PET PALS: $30k → 17%SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATI: $40k → 13%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $50k → 21%EUCLID PET PALS: $25k → 17%SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATI: $30k → 13%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $35k → 21%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $25k → 21%LAKE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25k → 9%LAKE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25k → 9%SHORE HAVEN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $80k → 17%SHORE HAVEN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $60k → 17%SHORE HAVEN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $55k → 17%SHORE HAVEN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $50k → 17%SHORE HAVEN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $50k → 17%SHORE HAVEN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $50k → 17%SHORE HAVEN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $50k → 17%SHORE HAVEN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $30k → 17%CLEVELAND LUTHERAN EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $100k → 17%LUTHERN EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $80k → 17%CLEVELAND LUTHERAN EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $60k → 17%CLEVELAND LUTHERAN EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 17%CLEVELAND LUTHERAN EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $40k → 17%CLEVELAND LUTHERAN EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $40k → 17%LUTHERN EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $40k → 17%LUTHERN EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $40k → 17%CLEVELAND LUTHERAN EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $27k → 17%CLEVELAND INTERNATIONA FILM SOCIETY: $40k → 17%CLEVELAND INTERNATIONA FILM SOCIETY: $35k → 17%CLEVELAND INTERNATIONA FILM SOCIETY: $30k → 17%CLEVELAND INTERNATIONA FILM SOCIETY: $30k → 17%CLEVELAND INTERNATIONA FILM SOCIETY: $30k → 17%CLEVELAND INTERNATIONA FILM SOCIETY: $30k → 17%CLEVELAND INTERNATIONA FILM SOCIETY: $30k → 17%WESTERN RESERVE HUMANE SOCIETY: $35k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 22 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
5

Total granted

$3.6M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+19%

Still filing today

45%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsReligionInternationalArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $400k · revenue +134%
  • EP
    EUCLID PET PALS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $238k · revenue +233% · 26% of their budget
  • LW
    LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +19%
  • CL
    CLEVELAND LUTHERAN WEST HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • LC
    LUTHERAN CHAPLAINCY SERVICE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake Humane Society

Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…

Animals
2
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
3
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
Animal Angels
—
6
Last Chance for Animals

Dedicated to ending animal abuse and exploitation through education, public outreach and investigations.

Animals
7
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
8
The Animal Rescue League
Animals
9
Columbus Humane

To fight animal cruelty, help animals in need and advocate for their well-being.

Animals
10
North Shore Animal League America Inc

Since 1944, the north shore animal league america's mission has been to save the lives of pets through adoption, rescue, education, medical care, spay/neuter and advocacy.

Animals
11
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
12
Soc Prevt Cruelty Animal Tuw
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cleveland Zoological Society; the most unlike its peers is Euclid Pet Pals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHORE HAVEN LUTHERN CHURCH: $450,000 · OtherSHORE HAVEN LUTHERN CHURCHCLEVELAND LUTHERAN EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $316,500 · OtherCLEVELAND LUTHERAN EAST HIGH SCHOOLSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATI: $277,500 · OtherSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATIBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC: $265,000 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTICCLEVELAND INTERNATIONA FILM SOCIETY: $228,024 · OtherCLEVELAND INTERNATIONA FILM SOCIETYWESTERN RESERVE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $160,000 · OtherWESTERN RESERVE HUMANE SOCIETY INCLUTHERN EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $160,000 · OtherLUTHERN EAST HIGH SCHOOLEUCLID HUNGER CENTER: $157,500 · OtherEUCLID HUNGER CENTERLAKE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $155,000 · OtherLAKE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYTENDER MERCIES INC: $131,500 · OtherDisabled American Veterans: $120,000 · OtherPUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE FOUNDAT: $100,000 · Other+5 more: $97,500 · OtherSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $400,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S P…LUTHERAN ENDOWMENT & AID FUNDINC: $52,000 · ReligionLUTHERAN ENDO…EUCLID PET PALS: $237,500 · AnimalsEUCLID PET…PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $75,000 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR…VALLEY SAVE A PET INC: $15,000 · Animals+2 more: $10,500 · AnimalsLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $200,000 · InternationalThe Musical Arts Association: $27,500 · Arts & CultureFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Education
Other$2,618,524Religion$452,000Animals$338,000International$200,000Arts & Culture$27,500Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $400,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEUCLID PET PALS: $237,500 over 9y, 26% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $200,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTENDER MERCIES INC: $131,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $120,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $75,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN ENDOWMENT & AID FUNDINC: $52,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetSAFARI JOES WILDLIFE RANCH INC: $47,500 over 3y, 53% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY SAVE A PET INC: $15,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetCLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds EUCLID PET PALS ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds TENDER MERCIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN ENDOWMENT & AID FUNDINC ↗
  • Who funds SAFARI JOES WILDLIFE RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY SAVE A PET INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenneth W Scott Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenneth W Scott Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kenneth W Scott Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kenneth W Scott Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kenneth W Scott’s filings →

More from the funding graph