· Private foundation
Kenneth P and Sally Rich Burbidge Foundation No 2
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH | $50,000 |
| COTTONWOOD CANYON FOUNDATION | $16,000 |
| CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LDS | $8,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH | $3,300 |
| B WILSON SPORTS GROUP | $2,500 |
| CLAYTON MIDDLE SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| SKYLINE HIGH SCHOOL SWIM TEAM | $400 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +58% for those funded once.
17 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- UFUTAH FOOD BANK4× · 2018–2023 · $6k · revenue +95%
- URUTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION5× · 2019–2023 · $4k · revenue +40%
- YBYAPAY BOLIVIA FOUNDATION2× · 2018–2019 · $1k · revenue +418%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $3k
- UCUTAH COMMUNITY ACTION HEAD STARTone grant, 2018 · $2k
- OROUR RESCUEgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +58%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Serving refugees living in Salt Lake County who are unable to communicate in English and do not know how to navigate the system on-call 24-7 provided free a language interpreter and guidance through the system also help during weekday…
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
The promotion of low-income housing within the state of utah.
To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.
Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.
Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.
Utah valley refugee mission is to assist refugees in utah in their quest to become self reliant. the organization accomplishes its mission by providing employment & housing assistance, education grants, esl skills,and healthcare services.…
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
Provide housing to low-income families in provo, utah.
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Salt Lake Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds YAPAY BOLIVIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS UTAH INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY ACTION CENTER ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Kenneth P and Sally Rich Burbidge Foundation No 2 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenneth P and Sally Rich Burbidge Foundation No 2. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Kenneth P and Sally Rich Burbidge Foundation No 2’s filings →