Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kenneth J and Marilynn J Friedman Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2026still arriving
24
Grants FY2026still arriving
8
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$414kArts & Culture$46kEducation$20kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$12kCommunity Improvement$6kPublic Benefit$5kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2026 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k22 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$1,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$117k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADAT ARI EL$12,750
cantors assembly$11,000
MAZON$5,000
encore musical theatre$5,000
JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION$5,000
CENTER THEATRE GROUP$3,500
HILLEL AT UCLA$3,000
YIDDISH BOOK CENTER$2,500
AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY$2,500
colburn school$2,500
BUILDERS OF JEWISH EDUCATION$2,000
MASORTI FOUNDATION$1,500
HILLELS OF THE VALLEY$1,500
ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION$1,000
jewish theological seminary$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $375) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOR GOODNESS CAKES: $250 → 14%FOR GOODNESS CAKES: $125 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
AZ
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$572k · 29 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2026, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
17

Total granted

$572k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+18%

Still filing today

59%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureEducationReligionHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $21k · revenue +99%
  • HA
    HILLEL AT UCLA
    10× · 2017–2026 · $21k · revenue +108%
  • MA
    MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger
    10× · 2017–2026 · $16k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • MD
    MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
7
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
8
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
9
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

—
10
University of Judaism Foundation
—
11
Los Angeles Jewish Symphony

To promote and support existing and newly-composed jewish music through the presentation of jewish music concerts and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
12
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Andrew Goodman Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADAT ARI EL: $324,640 · OtherADAT ARI ELTEMPLE RAMAT ZION: $46,150 · OtherTEMPLE RAMAT ZIONHILLEL AT UCLA: $21,000 · Other+34 more: $95,404 · Other+34 moreCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $24,500 · Arts & CultureCENTER THE…NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $21,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL Y…GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE COLBURN SCHOOL: $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE OPERA LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES: $2,225 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC: $19,500 · ReligionCANTOR'S ASSEMBLY: $11,500 · ReligionAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $15,500 · EducationYeshiva Ketana of Los Angeles: $2,050 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationPICO UNION PROJECT: $3,500 · Community ImprovementGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $1,500 · PhilanthropyST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $750 · HealthTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $500 · Health
Other$487,194Arts & Culture$53,225Religion$31,000Education$18,050Community Improvement$3,500Philanthropy$1,500Health$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $24,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $21,000 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL AT UCLA: $21,000 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC: $19,500 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $15,500 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $15,500 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetCANTOR'S ASSEMBLY: $11,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPICO UNION PROJECT: $3,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OPERA LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES: $2,225 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetYeshiva Ketana of Los Angeles: $2,050 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OLEY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOR GOODNESS CAKES: $375 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT UCLA ↗
  • Who funds BUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CANTOR'S ASSEMBLY ↗
  • Who funds THE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PICO UNION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COLBURN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE OPERA LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds Yeshiva Ketana of Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE DEBORAH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Jewish Communal Fund · Jacoby Family Foundation · The Field Family Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles Group · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenneth J and Marilynn J Friedman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenneth J and Marilynn J Friedman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kenneth J and Marilynn J Friedman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph