Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kenneth and Mary McQueen Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$153k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$602k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$6,375
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$6,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY SOUTHEAST$4,375
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA$3,750
HANOVER COLLEGE$1,000
OAKLAND CITY UNIVERSITY$1,000
VINCENNES UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE$1,000
WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY$875
VINCENNES UNIVERSITY JASPER CAMPUS$875
COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY$875
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $900 → 11%FRANKLIN COLLEGE: $900 → 8%JASPER HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 8%OAKLAND CITY UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%INDIANA UNIVERSITY SOUTHEAST: $4k → 10%PIKE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 12%HANOVER COLLEGE: $3k → 12%VINCENNES UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%SALON PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY: $1k → 15%MARIAN UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS: $725 → 16%TELL CITY HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 17%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS: $900 → 8%WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $4k → 18%JASPER HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 8%OAKLAND CITY UNIVERSITY: $1k → 10%INDIANA UNIVERSITY SOUTHEAST: $900 → 10%PIKE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 12%HANOVER COLLEGE: $1k → 12%VINCENNES UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $8k → 15%TELL CITY HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 17%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $875 → 18%JASPER HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 8%PIKE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 12%HANOVER COLLEGE: $900 → 12%VINCENNES UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $4k → 15%TELL CITY HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 17%VINCENNES UNIVERSITY JASPER CAMPUS: $1k → 8%VINCENNES UNIVERSITY JASPER CAMPUS: $875 → 8%SOUTHRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 8%SOUTHRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 8%SOUTHRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$147k · 17 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$147k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+11%

Still filing today

24%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $875 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +8%
  • HC
    Hanover College
    3× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +71%
  • OC
    Oakland City University
    2× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +15%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $917 · revenue +10%
  • FC
    Franklin College of Indiana
    one grant, 2022 · $900 · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
2
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
3
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
6
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
9
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
10
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
11
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Vincennes University Jasper Center Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PIKE COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION: $16,250 · OtherPIKE COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATIONTELL CITY HIGH SCHOOL: $16,250 · OtherTELL CITY HIGH SCHOOLSOUTHRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL: $16,250 · OtherSOUTHRIDGE HIGH SCHOOLJASPER HIGH SCHOOL: $16,250 · OtherJASPER HIGH SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $16,008 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANAIndiana University School of Medicine: $11,642 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $8,450 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYINDIANA UNIVERSITY SOUTHEAST: $6,275 · OtherVINCENNES UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · OtherINDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,200 · OtherWESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $4,675 · Other+6 more: $10,775 · Other+6 moreUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $8,483 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …Hanover College: $4,900 · EducationHanover Colleg…Oakland City University: $2,500 · EducationOakland City U…KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $917 · EducationFranklin College of Indiana: $900 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $900 · Education
Other$133,525Education$19,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $8,483 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHanover College: $4,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOakland City University: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVINCENNES UNIVERSITY JASPER CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $2,075 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $917 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFranklin College of Indiana: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Hanover College ↗
  • Who funds Oakland City University ↗
  • Who funds VINCENNES UNIVERSITY JASPER CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Franklin College of Indiana ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Council of Independent CollegesDC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Council of Independent Colleges · National Collegiate Athletic Association · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenneth and Mary McQueen Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenneth and Mary McQueen Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kenneth and Mary McQueen Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph