Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kenneth & Bernice Newberger Family Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$140kArts & Culture$36kHealth$5kInternational$3kHuman Services$2kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$333k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIV OF CHICAGO CROWN FAMILY SCH OF$10,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL$5,000
BUXTON SCHOOL$5,000
OLIVERIAN SCHOOL$5,000
RAVINIA$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,450
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$3,000
ANNE K TAYLOR FUND$1,000
SHALVA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHALVA: $500 → 14%SHALVA: $500 → 14%SHALVA: $500 → 14%SHALVA: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$251k · 7 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$251k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+35%

Still filing today

57%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2020–2025 · $88k
  • BS
    BUXTON SCHOOLINC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue -16%
  • UO
    UNIV OF CHICAGO CROWN FAMILY SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $45k

Funded once

  • HI
    HELPHOPELIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +35%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
7
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
8
Yivo Institute for Jewish Research Inc

Yivo's mission is to study the thousand-year history of jewish life in eastern europe and russia in all its aspects: language, history, religion, folkways and material culture. yivo's archive and library preserves a significant collection…

Religion
9
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

—
10
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
11
Shalom School

Shalom school's mission is to provide each child with an outstanding education in a nurturing environment that is academically excellent, inclusive, innovative, and inspired by jewish values and traditions.

—
12
Abraham Joshua Heschel School

The abraham joshua heschel school is an independent jewish day school which includes students from a wide range of jewish backgrounds, practices and beliefs. (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helphopelive Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $87,793 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIV OF CHICAGO CROWN FAMILY SCHOOL: $45,000 · OtherUNIV OF CHICAGO CROWN FAMILY SCHOOLRAVINIA: $17,500 · OtherRAVINIAUNIV OF CHICAGO CROWN FAMILY SCH OF: $10,000 · OtherUNIV OF CHICAGO CROWN FAMILY SCH OFBUXTON SCHOOLINC: $55,000 · EducationBUXTON SCHOOLINCTHE OLIVERIAN SCHOOL INC: $30,000 · EducationTHE OLIVERIAN SCHOOL INCTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $13,500 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGOHELPHOPELIVE INC: $5,000 · HealthThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $5,000 · Arts & CultureInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,500 · InternationalSHALVA INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesANNE K TAYLOR FUND: $1,000 · Animals
Other$160,293Education$98,500Health$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000International$2,500Human Services$2,000Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUXTON SCHOOLINC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE OLIVERIAN SCHOOL INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHALVA INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUXTON SCHOOLINC ↗
  • Who funds THE OLIVERIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds HELPHOPELIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNE K TAYLOR FUND ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenneth & Bernice Newberger Family Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenneth & Bernice Newberger Family Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kenneth & Bernice Newberger Family Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Kenneth & Bernice Newberger Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kenneth & Bernice Newberger Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph