Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kennedy Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$15MHealth$6.2MEducation$4.2MArts & Culture$425kReligion$63kHuman Services$29kFood & Nutrition$26kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $534k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.6M
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$56M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION$1,600,000
MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION$100,000
HOUSTON MUSEUM OF DECORATIVE ARTS$100,000
SKYUKA HALL$84,000
THE COOLIDGE NATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR HERITAGE CENTER$50,000
FRIENDS OF SPECIAL CHILDREN$25,000
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL GEORGIA$20,000
SAINT ANNES EPISCOPAL CHURCH$20,000
ERLANGER HEALTH$20,000
RETRIEVING INDEPENDENCE INC$10,000
DEO CLINIC INC$10,000
HAITI DEAF ACADEMY$10,000
AGAPE YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER$10,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FRIENDS OF SPECIAL CHILDREN: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 16 repeat orgs$651k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
41

Total granted

$25M
$212k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+28%

Still filing today

63%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $439k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3.9M · revenue +372%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $125k · revenue +258%
  • A
    ARTSBUILD
    3× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF CHATTANOOGA
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • CP
    CHATTANOOGA PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chattanoogahamilton County Public Education Fund

To improve student achievement in public schools through highly effective teaching, strong leadership, and strategic partnerships so that children succeed in learning and in life.

Education
2
Chattanooga Design Studio

Chattanooga design studio seeks to elevate the quality of life for all citizens through guidance, collaboration, innovation, and education that promotes livable, accessible, walkable, and humane urban design.

Community Improvement
3
Medical Center of Central Georgia Inc

To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.

Health
4
The Greater Chattanooga Public Television Corporation

Wtci enriches lives through quality programs and services that educate, engage, and inspire a lifetime of learning and exploration.

Arts & Culture
5
United Way of South Central Tennessee

The united way of south central tennessee's mission is to improve lives by advancing opportunities for education, health, and financial stability for all. its vision is to be the primary community solutions leader for human services.

—
6
Chattanooga Theatre Centre Inc

Founded in 1923, the chattanooga theatre centre is a nonprofit community theatre celebrating its 102nd season of bringing quality theatre productions, classes, and workshops to the citizens of chattanooga and surrounding areas. the mission…

—
7
Tennessee Health Care Association

To maintain high standards for nursing homes in the state of tennessee and to seek the solutions to problems common to members of the association.

—
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
10
Ut Medical Group Inc

To be a successful physician led, professionally managed medical practice that benefits our patients and our community, while supporting the UT Health Science Center's mission through clinical excellence, financial responsibility and a…

Health
11
Chattacademy Community Schools Inc

The mission of chattacademy is to reimagine what public education can look like in chattanooga, tennessee. chattacademy's mission is to graduate bilingual, biliterate critical thinkers ready to make an impact on the world through top…

Education
12
Chattanooga Technology Council Inc

Our mission is to connect chattanooga's technology sector to drive regional economic growth.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Special Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
23/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JP MORGAN CHARITABLE GIVING FUND NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST KENNEDY F: $14,779,777 · OtherJP MORGAN CHARITABLE GIVING FUND NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST KENNEDY FERLANGER FOUNDATION: $5,872,000 · OtherERLANGER FOUNDATION+42 more: $641,100 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION INC: $3,920,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CHA…+5 more: $101,000 · EducationHOUSTON MUSEUM OF DECORATIVE ARTS: $200,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL INC: $125,000 · Arts & CultureARTSBUILD: $36,300 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $6,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Heart Association Inc: $22,000 · HealthERLANGER HEALTH: $20,000 · HealthDEO CLINIC INC: $10,000 · HealthMARY CAMERON ROBINSON FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Health+2 more: $1,050 · HealthUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA: $25,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF SPECIAL CHILDREN: $25,000 · Human ServicesChattanooga Area Food Bank Inc: $24,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$21,292,877Education$4,021,000Arts & Culture$367,300Health$63,050Philanthropy$51,000Human Services$25,000Food & Nutrition$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetERLANGER FOUNDATION: $5,872,000 over 6y, 71% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION INC: $3,920,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetHOUSTON MUSEUM OF DECORATIVE ARTS: $200,000 over 2y, 61% of budgetMEMORIAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL INC: $125,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSKYUKA HALL: $84,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetARTSBUILD: $36,300 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF SPECIAL CHILDREN: $25,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChattanooga Area Food Bank Inc: $24,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $22,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetERLANGER HEALTH: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAgape Community Center: $12,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDEO CLINIC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMARY CAMERON ROBINSON FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHATTANOOGA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOVENANT COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS CHILDRENS THEATER INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEGASUS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIGNAL CENTERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHATT FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAYLOR SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIRACLE LEAGUE OF CHATTANOOGA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSISKIN HOSPITAL FOR PHYSICAL REHABILITATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE CARNIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTENNESSEE RIVER GARDENS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHATTANOOGA HAMILTON COUNTY RESCUE SERVICE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ERLANGER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON MUSEUM OF DECORATIVE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SKYUKA HALL ↗
  • Who funds ARTSBUILD ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SPECIAL CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA ↗
  • Who funds Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ERLANGER HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Agape Community Center ↗
  • Who funds DEO CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds MARY CAMERON ROBINSON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ↗
  • Who funds RETRIEVING INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHATTANOOGA INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chattanooga Christian Community FoundationTN42.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Hamico Inc · Robert F Stone Foundation AKA Bobby Stone Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Weldon F Osborne Foundation Inc · Lyndhurst Foundation Inc · Benwood Foundation Inc · Robert L & Kathrina H Maclellan Founda Foundation · McKenzie Foundation D/B/A the McKenzie Foundation · Tucker Foundation · American Water Charitable Foundationinc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kennedy Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kennedy Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kennedy Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Kennedy Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kennedy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph