Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kenichi & Takayo Nakase Family Fdn

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0168% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$93kReligion$37kYouth Development$13kCrime & Legal$9kEducation$5kCommunity Improvement$3kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE TOKYO SVC CTR$25,000
JAPANESE CULTURAL NEWS ASSOC$6,000
KEIRO$6,000
JACCC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ANAHEIM REVIVE CHURCH$5,000
JAPANESE AMER NATL MUSEUM$5,000
LITTLE TOKYO SVC CTR BUDOKAN$4,000
RISING STARS$3,000
JAPANESE CULTURAL FAIR$3,000
DENSHO$3,000
VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS$2,000
PRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL$2,000
JAPANESE AMER MUSEUM$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JAPANESE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SN JOSE: $2k → 8%FIRST CHINESE BAPTIST: $1k → 10%LITTLE TOKYO SVC CTR: $25k → 14%DENSHO: $3k → 9%JAPANESE AMER MUSEUM: $2k → 8%ANAHEIM REVIVE CHURCH: $5k → 10%LITTLE TOKYO SVC CTR: $15k → 14%DENSHO: $1k → 9%JAPANESE AMER MUSEUM SAN JOSE: $1k → 8%ANAHEIM FREE METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 10%KEIRO: $6k → 14%DENSHO: $1k → 9%JAPANESE AMERICAN MUSEUM: $1k → 8%ANAHEIM REVIVE CHURCH: $5k → 10%LITTLE TOKYO SVC CTR BUDOKAN: $4k → 14%DENSHO: $1k → 9%JAPANESE AMER MUSEUM OF SAN JOSE: $1k → 8%KEIRO: $4k → 14%DENSHO: $3k → 9%LITTLE TOKYO SVC CTR BUDOKAN: $3k → 14%LITTLE TOKYO SVC CTR: $3k → 14%KEIRO: $2k → 14%LITTLE TOKYO SERVICE CTR: $2k → 14%LITTLE TOKYO SVC CTR BUDOKAN: $2k → 14%LITTLE TOKYO SVC CTR: $2k → 14%KEIRO: $1k → 14%KEIRO: $1k → 14%LITTLE TOKYO SVC CTR: $1k → 14%JAPANESE CULTURAL NEWS ASSOC: $6k → 14%JAPANESE CULTURAL NEWS ASSOC: $4k → 14%CUTURAL NEWS ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%JAPANESE AMER NATL MUSEUM: $5k → 14%JACCC: $5k → 14%JACCC: $5k → 14%JAPANESE AMERICAN NATL MUSEUM: $5k → 14%VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS: $2k → 14%JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $2k → 14%EWP CULTURAL: $2k → 14%EWP CULTURAL: $2k → 14%VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS: $2k → 14%NANKA WAKAYAMA KENJIKAI: $5k → 14%NANKA WAKAYAMA KENJIKAI: $5k → 14%NANKA WAKAYAMA KENJIKAI: $3k → 14%RISING STARS: $3k → 14%PRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL: $2k → 14%PRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL: $2k → 14%NANKA WAKAYAMA KENJINKAI: $2k → 14%NANKA WAKAYAMA KENJIKAI: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$176k · 18 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$176k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+42%

Still filing today

22%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM
    2× · 2022–2023 · $7k · revenue +47%
  • PL
    PRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +33%
  • JA
    JAPANESE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SAN JOSE
    2× · 2020–2023 · $3k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • OC
    OCO CLUBgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +203%
  • AR
    ANAHEIM REVIVE CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Japantown Cultural Society
Education
2
National Japanese American Historical Society Inc

The National Japanese American Historical Society, Inc. (NJAHS) charitable nonprofit organization dedicated to the collection, preservation, authentic interpretation, and sharing of historical information of the Japanese American…

—
3
Tessaku

To provide historical and educational content about the Japanese American WWII incarceration as a public service and resource

Arts & Culture
4
Nisei Week Foundation Inc

To educate the public on japanese and japanese-american history and culture.

Arts & Culture
5
Soka University of America

The mission of soka university of america is to foster a steady stream of global citizens committed to living a contributive life. continued on schedule o.

Education
6
Us-Japan Research Institute Suite 801
—
7
Nanka Kenjinkai Kyogikai Inc

To promote goodwill between the united states and japan, cultural exchange, education, and to encourage appreciation of the cultural heritage of various japanese prefectures in the kansai region of japan.

Arts & Culture
8
Yonsei Basketball Association

Provide a cultural exchange program with japan for the youth of southern californians to better understand the heritage of japan.

International
9
Japanese American Cultural Center of Vista

To promote and foster the understanding and appreciation of japanese and japanese american art, history, and culture. to preserve and disseminate inforation about the japanese american way of life to promote the study of the japanesese…

Arts & Culture
10
Nikkei for Civil Rights and Redress

To initiate and participate in activities that will promote the history, culture and social welfare of the japanese american community in southern california.this includes education about the world war ii incarceration of japanese american.

Unclassified
11
Japanese American Citizens League - Puyallup Valley

The japanese american citizens league is a national organization whose mission is to advocate and safeguard the civil and human rights of asian and pacific islander americans and all communities who are affected by injustice and bigotry.

—
12
Japan Society Inc

Japan society is the premier organization connecting japanese arts, culture, business, and society with audiences in new york and around the world. in fy2024, attendance onsite was 36.9k with 3.3k participating in online programs.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Budokan Inc; the most unlike its peers is Precious Lamb Preschool Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE TOKYO SVC CTR: $46,000 · OtherLITTLE TOKYO SVC CTRIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKEIRO: $14,000 · OtherKEIROJACCC: $12,000 · OtherJACCCANAHEIM REVIVE CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherANAHEIM REVIVE CHURCHOCO CLUB: $10,000 · OtherOCO CLUBJAPANESE CULTURAL NEWS ASSOC: $10,000 · OtherJAPANESE CULTURAL NEWS ASSOCLITTLE TOKYO SVC CTR BUDOKAN: $9,000 · OtherJAPANESE CULTURAL FAIR: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · Other+16 more: $41,050 · Other+16 moreDENSHO: $9,000 · Arts & CultureDENSHOJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $7,000 · Arts & CultureJAPANESE A…JAPANESE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SAN JOSE: $3,000 · Arts & CultureJAPANESE A…PRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC: $4,000 · EducationNORTH AMERICAN JAPANESE GARDEN ASS0: $1,000 · Education1979 LEGACY CORP: $2,000 · Community ImprovementBUDOKAN INC: $1,000 · Community ImprovementHOOPS FOR FRIENDS INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$183,050Arts & Culture$19,000Education$5,000Community Improvement$3,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOCO CLUB: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetDENSHO: $9,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SAN JOSE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget1979 LEGACY CORP: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN JAPANESE GARDEN ASS0: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOOPS FOR FRIENDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetBUDOKAN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OCO CLUB ↗
  • Who funds DENSHO ↗
  • Who funds JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds PRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds JAPANESE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SAN JOSE ↗
  • Who funds 1979 LEGACY CORP ↗
  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN JAPANESE GARDEN ASS0 ↗
  • Who funds HOOPS FOR FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BUDOKAN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenichi & Takayo Nakase Family Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenichi & Takayo Nakase Family Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kenichi & Takayo Nakase Family Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph