Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kendacar Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$544k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$312kArts & Culture$237kFood & Nutrition$235kYouth Development$159kHealth$150kHousing & Shelter$129kPublic Safety & Disaster$119kHuman Services$98kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $448k
$48,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PORT AUSTIN REEF LIGHT ASSOCATION$210,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL$100,000
PORT AUSTIN FIRE DEPARTMENT$88,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MCHENRY COUNTY$50,000
CRYSTAL LAKE ELEMENTARY DISTRICT 47$48,000
THE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER$20,000
NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK$10,000
INDIAN RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
MAX MCGRAW WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Project Linus: $250 → 8%THE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER: $20k → 12%THE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER: $7k → 12%THE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER: $2k → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $50k → 12%Options Advocacy for McHenry County: $2k → 6%Gifford Youth Achievement Center: $3k → 12%Gifford Youth Achievement Center: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$976k · 23 repeat orgs$575k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
22

Total granted

$976k
$177k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+36%

Still filing today

52%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $398k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $112k · revenue +202%
  • CL
    CRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $102k · revenue +16%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • SR
    Senior Resource Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +69%
  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2021 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childcare Resources of Indian River Inc

To ensure the availability and affordability of high quality early childhood and family support programs for children of income eligible working families in indian river county.

Human Services
2
River Bend Food Reservoir

To lead the community wide effort to end hunger in eastern iowa and western illinois. we will do this by leveraging partnerships to help people in need to stabilize their lives, engaging the public on hunger issues, advocating on behalf of…

Food & Nutrition
3
Illinois Valley Food Pantry

Providing food to needy families in the illinois valley area.

Food & Nutrition
4
The River Food Pantry Inc

Our mission is food, resources, and faith to build a stronger community.

Food & Nutrition
5
Executive Roundtable of Indian River County Inc

To identify solutions that will protect and enhance the lives of indian river county children, individuals, families, and seniors.

Youth Development
6
Feeding Illinois

Feeding illinois is a coalition of eight feeding america food banks that provide food to over 2,400 food pantries, soup kitchens, and shelters that feed nearly 1.4 million residents across the entire state of illinois.

Food & Nutrition
7
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
8
Central Illinois Foodbank Inc

The Foodbank's mission is to provide food, and develop awareness of and creative solutions for food insecurity. Annually, the Foodbank distributes approximately 9.5 million pounds of food to 130 food pantries, soup kitchens, children's…

Food & Nutrition
9
Indy Hunger Network Inc

The mission of indy hunger network is to address systemic hunger issues and eliminate disparities in the greater indianapolis hunger relief system through collaboration on programs, advocacy, and research.

Food & Nutrition
10
Indiana County Community Action Program

Provide resources for low income clients.

Human Services
11
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
12
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indian River Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Homeless Services & HousingCancer Research FundingEmergency Assistance & Food…Arts & Culture OrganizationsYouth Development and Caree…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%17%10–20yr17%44%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%14%10–20yr17%33%20–35yr14%45%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/27
the rest of the field
15%
5,489/35,651

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CRYSTAL LAKE ELEMENTARY DISTRICT 47 — $176,095 · OtherCRYSTAL LAKE ELEMENTARY DISTRICT 47CLEVELAND CLINIC INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL — $100,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC INDIAN RIVER HOSPITALPORT AUSTIN FIRE DEPARTMENT — $88,000 · OtherPORT AUSTIN FIRE DEPARTMENTIndian River County Habitat for Humanity Inc — $70,000 · OtherIndian River County Habitat for Humanity IncMax McGraw Wildlife Foundation — $43,000 · OtherMax McGraw Wildlife FoundationBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF INDIAN RIVER — $34,500 · OtherHURON COUNTY SAFEPLACE — $31,000 · OtherIRC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $30,000 · OtherDistrict 47 GiftCard Pgm NorthWestW — $25,861 · Other+25 more — $171,394 · Other+25 moreTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC — $112,000 · Food & NutritionTREASURE COAST FO…CRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY INC — $102,452 · Food & NutritionCRYSTAL LAKE FOOD…NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $20,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN ILLINOIS…+1 more — $1,000 · Food & NutritionPORT AUSTIN REEFLIGHT ASSOCIATION INC — $210,000 · Arts & CulturePORT AUSTIN REEFL…RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureRIVERSIDE THEATRE…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentSenior Resource Association Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC — $29,000 · Human ServicesIMPACT 100 OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — $10,200 · Human ServicesGIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC — $5,250 · Human Services+2 more — $2,250 · Human ServicesTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC — $95,000 · EducationCASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC — $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$769,850Food & Nutrition$235,452Arts & Culture$235,000Youth Development$100,000Human Services$96,700Education$95,000Crime & Legal$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPORT AUSTIN REEFLIGHT ASSOCIATION INC — $210,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC — $112,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY INC — $102,452 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC — $100,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC — $95,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetIndian River County Habitat for Humanity Inc — $70,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSenior Resource Association Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMax McGraw Wildlife Foundation — $43,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC — $29,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetRIVERSIDE THEATRE INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetDASIE BRIDGEWATER HOPE CENTER INC — $12,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetIMPACT 100 OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — $10,200 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetGIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC — $5,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOptions and Advocacy for Mchenry County Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD PANTRY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT LINUS — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PORT AUSTIN REEFLIGHT ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds CRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC
  • Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds Indian River County Habitat for Humanity Inc
  • Who funds Senior Resource Association Inc
  • Who funds Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation
  • Who funds THE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds CASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC
  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DASIE BRIDGEWATER HOPE CENTER INC
  • Who funds IMPACT 100 OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
  • Who funds TREASURE COAST MANATEE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC
  • Who funds UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC
  • Who funds Options and Advocacy for Mchenry County Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Indian River Community Foundation IncFL19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Indian River Community Foundation Inc · Bernard a Egan Foundation Inc · Jake Owen Foundation · Welsh Family Foundation Inc · Grand Harbor Community Outreach Program Inc · The John's Island Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Olivia Delacruz Foundation Inc · The Rogers Family Foundation · The Karen Katen Foundation · The Carwill Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kendacar Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc2% of income from government
  • The Learning Alliance Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kendacar Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Kendacar Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph