Skip to content

· Public charity

Kenai Mountains-Turnagain Arm Nat'l Heritage Corridor Communities Assoc

The mission of the KMTA Corridor Communities Association (KMTA) is to honor the living heritage of the Turnagain Arm and Eastern Kenai Peninsula by connecting people to its lands, stories, and communities.

$149k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$74k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Recreation & Sports$269kArts & Culture$99kAnimals$86kEnvironment$81kEducation$68kCommunity Improvement$49kPublic Safety & Disaster$29kFood & Nutrition$21kOther$0
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $172k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $128k
$37,769
Median grant
1
States reached
$710k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$73,787
Seward Iditarod Trail Blazers$54,238
Pickle Hill Public Broadcasting$45,570
Alaska Trails$37,769
Moose Pass Public Library$33,193
Individual grant recipient$21,469
Alutiq Pride Marine Institure Mural Installation$21,400
Four Valleys Community School Inc$13,078
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BEGICH TOWERS INC: $21k → 7%ALASKA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER: $60k → 10%Pickle Hill Public Broadcasting: $46k → 11%STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $15k → 7%CITY OF WHITTIER: $10k → 7%Girdwood Chapel: $21k → 10%Cook Inlet Aquaculture Association: $7k → 11%STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $10k → 7%ALASKA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER: $19k → 10%Moose Pass Public Library: $33k → 11%Student Conservation Association: $10k → 7%GIRDWOOD INC: $17k → 10%MOOSE PASS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10k → 11%Four Valleys Community School Inc: $13k → 10%MOOSE PASS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10k → 11%GIRDWOOD MOUNTAIN BIKE ALLIANCE: $10k → 10%MOOSE PASS SPORTSMENS CLUB: $10k → 11%APPLIED ARCHAEOLOGY INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 10%Seward Iditarod Trail Blazers: $54k → 11%FOUR VALLEYS COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $8k → 10%CITY OF SEWARD PARKS & REC DEPT: $10k → 11%GIRDWOOD INC: $7k → 10%SEWARD MURAL SOCIETY: $8k → 11%BELUGA WHALE ALLIANCE: $7k → 10%Seward Prevention Coalition: $8k → 11%Four Valleys Community School Inc: $6k → 10%HOPE & SUNRISE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $15k → 11%GIRDWOOD INC: $6k → 10%HOPE & SUNRISE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $15k → 11%MAX ROMEY PRODUCTIONS: $15k → 10%HOPE & SUNRISE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $9k → 11%Alaska Geographics: $74k → 10%COOPER LANDING COMMUNITY CLUB: $14k → 11%DNR ALASKA STATE PARKS: $14k → 10%Alaska Division of Parks & Recreation: $9k → 11%ALASKA TRAILS: $12k → 10%DNR ALASKA STATE PARKS: $10k → 10%ALASKA GEOGRAPHIC: $8k → 10%ALASKA TRAILS: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Kenai Mountains-Turnagain Arm Nat'l Heritage Corridor Communities Assoc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in AK; by stated purpose, 81%.

Kenai Mountains-Turnagain Arm Nat'l Heritage Corridor Communities Assoclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$316k · 8 repeat orgs$416k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +133% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$316k
$166k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+133%
+38%

Still filing today

63%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Recreation & SportsEnvironmentAnimalsCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    ALASKA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $79k · revenue +185%
  • AT
    Alaska Trails
    5× · 2018–2024 · $64k · revenue +646%
  • TS
    THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $35k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • BT
    BEGICH TOWERS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $21k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • CL
    Cooper Landing Community Club Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $14k · revenue +32% · 27% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Historical Publication Association
Education
2
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
3
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-Seacc

SEACC's mission is to protect the special places of the world's largest temperate rainforest, promote conservation, and advocate for sustainability in human use of natural resources. Inspired by the land, wildlife, cultures, and…

Environment
4
Sitka Conservation Society

Educating the public about conservation issues

Environment
5
Alaska Sustainability Initiative

To advance solutions that build the resilience and sustainability of Alaska, for its current and future residents and the natural systems upon which they depend.

Animals
6
Alaska Association for Historic Pre

To educate the public about hisroric preservation and help restore and preserve historic sites.

Unclassified
7
Katmai Conservancy

Katmai Conservancy supports the preservation of Katmai National Park and Preserve its unique ecosystems scenic character and associated natural and cultural resources by promoting greater public interest appreciation and support through…

Environment
8
Anchorage Ski Club Inc

To provide access, facilities, recreation, and educational opportunities within the alpine environment of Chugach State Park.

Recreation & Sports
9
Island Trails Network

Develop, maintain, and promote accessible, sustainable trails. Foster a community of stewards for lands and shorelines in the Kodiak Archipelago through action, advocacy, and education.

Environment
10
Alaska Association of Conservation Districts Inc

The primary purpose of aacd is to provide administrative support to local districts and expend funds to carry our local programs aimed at conservation and orderly development of alaska's land and water resources.

Environment
11
Sitka Trail Works Inc

Provide for the health of the community of sitka, alaska through development, maintenance and promotion of a comprehensive trail system.

Public Benefit
12
Southeast Alaska Watershed Coalition

We foster partnerships and inspire southeast alaskans to steward our watersheds and support communities through participatory projects, research, and learning.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cooper Landing Community Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $73,787 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSEWARD IDITAROD TRAIL BLAZERS INC: $54,238 · OtherSEWARD IDITAROD TRAIL BLAZERS INCHOPE AND SUNRISE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $38,315 · OtherHOPE AND SUNRISE HISTORICAL SOCIETYTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $34,815 · OtherTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INCMOOSE PASS PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $33,193 · OtherMOOSE PASS PUBLIC LIBRARY INCDNR ALASKA STATE PARKS: $24,202 · OtherDNR ALASKA STATE PARKSIndividual grant recipient: $21,469 · OtherAlutiq Pride Marine Institure Mural Installation: $21,400 · OtherBEGICH TOWERS INC: $21,343 · OtherMOOSE PASS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & VISITOR BUREAU: $19,907 · Other+11 more: $107,751 · Other+11 moreALASKA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $78,679 · AnimalsALASKA WILDL…Alaska Trails: $64,259 · Recreation & SportsAlaska Trail…Cooper Landing Community Club Inc: $14,249 · Recreation & SportsCooper Landi…PICKLE HILL PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $45,570 · Arts & CultureGIRDWOOD INC: $29,526 · Community ImprovementFOUR VALLEYS COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $26,645 · EducationALASKA GEOGRAPHIC ASSOCIATION: $8,400 · EnvironmentAlaska Mountain & Wilderness Huts Association dba Alaska Huts Association: $6,517 · EnvironmentSEWARD PREVENTION COALITION: $7,638 · Youth Development
Other$450,420Animals$78,679Recreation & Sports$78,508Arts & Culture$45,570Community Improvement$29,526Education$26,645Environment$14,917Youth Development$7,638

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALASKA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $78,679 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAlaska Trails: $64,259 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetPICKLE HILL PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $45,570 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $34,815 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRDWOOD INC: $29,526 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetFOUR VALLEYS COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $26,645 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetCooper Landing Community Club Inc: $14,249 over 1y, 27% of budgetMOOSE PASS SPORTSMENS CLUB: $9,703 over 1y, 23% of budgetALASKA GEOGRAPHIC ASSOCIATION: $8,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSEWARD ARTS COUNCIL: $8,288 over 1y, 56% of budgetSEWARD PREVENTION COALITION: $7,638 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOOK INLET AQUACULTURE ASSOCIATION: $7,081 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAlaska Mountain & Wilderness Huts Association dba Alaska Huts Association: $6,517 over 1y, 6.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALASKA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Trails ↗
  • Who funds SEWARD IDITAROD TRAIL BLAZERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PICKLE HILL PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRDWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUR VALLEYS COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Cooper Landing Community Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOOSE PASS SPORTSMENS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA GEOGRAPHIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SEWARD ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SEWARD PREVENTION COALITION ↗
  • Who funds COOK INLET AQUACULTURE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Mountain & Wilderness Huts Association dba Alaska Huts Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alaska Community FoundationAK27.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Rasmuson Foundation · Atwood Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenai Mountains-Turnagain Arm Nat'l Heritage Corridor Communities Assoc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenai Mountains-Turnagain Arm Nat'l Heritage Corridor Communities Assoc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kenai Mountains-Turnagain Arm Nat'l Heritage Corridor Communities Assoc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph