Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ken & Dean Kirn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$310k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$186k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of KEN & DEAN KIRN FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $186k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SW WA$186,000
COLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM$25,000
VANCOUVER SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$25,000
OPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES$10,000
FREEDOM FOUNDATION$10,000
THE HISTORIC TRUST$5,000
PORTLAND RESCUE MISSION$5,000
YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION$5,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$5,000
FREE CLINICS OF SW WASHINGTON$5,000
TURNING POINT USA$5,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$5,000
CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK$5,000
CONSERVATIVE PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE$3,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MI
NY
OR
CA
VA
AZ
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 24 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
4

Total granted

$1.2M
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+375%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePublic BenefitCrime & LegalEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM
    7× · 2018–2025 · $117k · revenue +120%
  • VS
    VANCOUVER SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $112k · revenue +83%
  • OPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES
    4× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • PR
    PORTLAND RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2025 · $5k
  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • AI
    ACCURACY IN MEDIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $1k · revenue +375%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
2
Center for American Progress

The center for american progress (cap) is an independent nonpartisan policy institute that is dedicated to improving the lives of all americans through bold, progressive ideas, as well as strong leadership and concerted action. our aim is…

Civil Rights
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

4
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
5
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

6
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
7
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

10
American Press Institute Inc

American press institute acts as a scout on the frontier of technology and audience behavior to identify where change is occurring and helps news organizations learn how to implement and scale that change successfully so they have a…

Arts & Culture
11
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
12
Washington Appellate Project

The washington appellate project contracts with the state of washington and the federal government to provide legal representation to indigent persons on appeal.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SW WA — $329,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SW WAPEACEHEALTH FOUNDATION — $220,000 · OtherPEACEHEALTH FOUNDATIONVANCOUVER SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $111,500 · OtherVANCOUVER SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAFREEDOM FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Other+15 more — $151,750 · Other+15 moreCOLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM — $116,500 · Arts & CultureCOLUMBIA RI…VANCOUVER NATIONAL HISTORIC RESERVE TRUST — $12,500 · Arts & CultureVANCOUVER N…+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $70,000 · EducationConservative Partnership Institute — $8,500 · EducationDAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES — $70,000 · HealthOPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $25,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $7,000 · Public BenefitTHE FREEDOM FUND — $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$852,250Arts & Culture$130,000Education$78,500Health$70,000Housing & Shelter$60,000Public Benefit$32,000Philanthropy$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM — $116,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetVANCOUVER SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $111,500 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES — $70,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES — $60,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK — $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FREEDOM FUND — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation — $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVANCOUVER NATIONAL HISTORIC RESERVE TRUST — $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetConservative Partnership Institute — $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADE POLICY INSTITUTE — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD FORESTRY CENTER — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM
  • Who funds VANCOUVER SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds DAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES
  • Who funds OPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation
  • Who funds THE FREEDOM FUND
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation
  • Who funds VANCOUVER NATIONAL HISTORIC RESERVE TRUST
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Conservative Partnership Institute
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC
  • Who funds CASCADE POLICY INSTITUTE
  • Who funds WORLD FORESTRY CENTER
  • Who funds ACCURACY IN MEDIA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

M J Murdock Charitable TrustWA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ken & Dean Kirn Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc20% of income from government
  • Columbia River Maritime Museum3% of income from government
  • World Forestry Center0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ken & Dean Kirn Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ken & Dean Kirn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph