Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kemper Freeman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$55kReligion$38kHealth$33kHuman Services$24kArts & Culture$20kPublic Benefit$13kPhilanthropy$11kYouth Development$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,503
Median grant
4
States reached
$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$6,003
BELLEVUE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$5,503
ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,092
WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER$2,763
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER$2,724
LIFE ENRICHMENT OPTIONS$2,500
KINDERING CENTER$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF WA FOUNDATION$1,783
YOUNG LIFE$1,503
SACRED HEART CHURCH$1,503
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$1,503
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BELLEVUE$1,503
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATON$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,164
BELLEVUE ROTARY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BELLEVUE LIFESPRING: $1k → 9%BELLEVUE LIFESPRING: $600 → 9%BELLEVUE LIFESPRING: $600 → 9%BELLEVUE LIFESPRING: $600 → 9%SEATTLE HOMELESS OUTREACH: $304 → 9%SEATTLE HOMELESS OUTREACH: $304 → 9%SEATTLE HOMELESS OUTREACH: $304 → 9%SEATTLE HOMELESS OUTREACH: $304 → 9%SEATTLE HOMELESS OUTREACH: $304 → 9%YOUTHCARE: $400 → 9%YOUTHCARE: $400 → 9%YOUTHCARE: $400 → 9%YOUTHCARE: $400 → 9%YOUTHCARE: $400 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$234k · 32 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
5

Total granted

$234k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+80%

Still filing today

63%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BELLEVUE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +40%
  • KC
    KINDERING CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +29%
  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • SH
    SACRED HEART SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +16%
  • SJ
    ST JAMES CATHEDRAL
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bellevue College Foundation

Bellevue college foundation brings together people and resources across the community to invest in bc students, faculty, and staff to realize their goals and dreams.

Education
2
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
3
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
4
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
5
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
6
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
7
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
8
Seattle Public Library Foundation

The seattle public library foundation inspires the community's philanthropic support, advocacy for, and pride in the library.

Education
9
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
10
Seattle Children's Hospital

Seattle children's hospital (seattle children's) will be an innovative leader in pediatric health and wellness through our unsurpassed quality, clinical care, relentless spirit of inquiry, and compassion for all children and their…

Health
11
Bellevue Youth Symphony Orchestra

Bellevue youth symphony orchestra enhances the lives of student musicians by providing dynamic musical experiences, fostering collaboration, confidence, and personal responsibility through the pursuit of artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
12
Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc

The oregon shakespeare festival creates world-class theater, revealing our collective humanity through illuminating interpretations of new and classic plays, and inspiring a love of our art form for current and future generations.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Seattle Homeless Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
23/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BELLEVUE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $27,518 · OtherBELLEVUE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $26,486 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $19,892 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHKINDERING CENTER: $15,000 · OtherKINDERING CENTERFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $14,120 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTEREASTSIDE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $8,455 · OtherSACRED HEART PARISH: $7,328 · Other+23 more: $68,381 · Other+23 moreUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $10,698 · EducationLIFE ENRICHMENT OPTIONS: $5,500 · EducationTHE OVERLAKE SCHOOL: $2,787 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $1,503 · EducationBELLEVUE ART MUSEUM: $8,000 · Arts & CultureCLASSICAL 981: $4,700 · Arts & CulturePERFORMING ARTS CENTER EASTSIDE: $1,750 · Arts & CultureORCAS CENTER: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER: $13,013 · Civil RightsORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8,618 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR OAK PARK: $616 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATION: $400 · PhilanthropyYOUNG LIFE: $9,019 · Youth Development+1 more: $304 · Youth DevelopmentBELLEVUE BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY: $5,839 · EnvironmentTHE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST: $1,000 · Environment
Other$187,180Education$20,488Arts & Culture$15,450Civil Rights$13,013Philanthropy$9,634Youth Development$9,323Environment$6,839

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBELLEVUE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $27,518 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKINDERING CENTER: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $14,120 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER: $13,013 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $10,698 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $9,019 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8,618 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE ART MUSEUM: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SEATTLE: $6,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBELLEVUE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetBELLEVUE BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY: $5,839 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE ENRICHMENT OPTIONS: $5,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetGeorge Pocock Rowing Foundation: $5,112 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCLASSICAL 981: $4,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetORCAS OPEN ARTS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOVERLAKE SERVICE LEAGUE: $2,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OVERLAKE SCHOOL: $2,787 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHCARE: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS CENTER EASTSIDE: $1,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE HOMELESS OUTREACH: $1,520 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $1,503 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR OAK PARK: $616 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaris Place: $304 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BELLEVUE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KINDERING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF SEATTLE ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LIFE ENRICHMENT OPTIONS ↗
  • Who funds George Pocock Rowing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CLASSICAL 981 ↗
  • Who funds ORCAS OPEN ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OVERLAKE SERVICE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds THE OVERLAKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds PERFORMING ARTS CENTER EASTSIDE ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE HOMELESS OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds ORCAS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA33.4× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of King County · Lucky Seven Foundation · Sos Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Orcas Bay Foundation · Glasser Family Fund · Thanksgiving Foundation Bessemer Trust Company Na · Ash Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kemper Freeman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kemper Freeman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of Portland: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kemper Freeman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kemper Freeman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kemper Freeman’s filings →

More from the funding graph