Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Keller Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$76k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Human Services$233kReligion$232kInternational$51kCrime & Legal$27kEducation$7kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $63k
$7,800
Median grant
6
States reached
$603k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRIEF & LOSS CTR OF N TX$14,500
GATEWAY OF GRACE$12,000
LIGHT OF HOPE IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER$12,000
COOPERATIVE BAPTIST FELLOWSHIP$12,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
FAITH COMMONS$7,800
DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$2,000
GOOD FAITH MEDIA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
FELLOWSHIP SOUTHWEST$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%LIGHT OF HOPE IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $12k → 5%LIGHT OF HOPE IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $12k → 5%LIGHT OF HOPE IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $3k → 5%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $6k → 14%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$570k · 16 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$570k
$2k

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    GATEWAY OF GRACE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $109k · revenue +10%
  • BI
    BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2018–2022 · $31k · revenue +150%
  • LO
    LIGHT OF HOPE IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $27k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • G
    GIVECAMPUS
    one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Faith Network
Human Services
2
Good Faith Network Inc

Good Faith Network Inc develops theological content to guide Christians in their life in the secular world. The range of topics covered by Good Faith Network content will be vast, but will generally center around the intersection of…

Religion
3
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
4
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
5
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
6
Free Grace International

Create content that shares jesus' message

Religion
7
Faithful America

The largest online community of christians putting faith into action for social justice. continued on schedule o

Civil Rights
8
Christian Immigration Advocacy Cent

Provide high-quality legal services in a compassionate, incarnational, and culturally-appropriate way and empower churches to serve their sojourner neighbors well through collaborative partnerships.

Human Services
9
The Grace Message

The Grace Message exists to share the hope and encouragement found in the New Covenant message of Gods grace by helping people embrace the finished work of Christ, walk in their new identity, and enjoy freedom from lifeless religion.

Religion
10
Grateful Shepherd Ministries

Training pastors and leaders in christian faith

Religion
11
Imago Dei Ministries
12
Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America Cathedral Church of St Paul

Religious

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Light of Hope Immigration Law Center and the most unlike its peers is The Preemptive Love Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GRIEF & LOSS CTR OF N TX — $122,500 · OtherGRIEF & LOSS CTR OF N TXIndividual grant recipient — $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOOPERATIVE BAPTIST FELLOWSHIP INC — $70,000 · OtherCOOPERATIVE BAPTIST FELLOWSHIP INCWILSHIRE BAPTIST CHURCH — $50,000 · OtherWILSHIRE BAPTIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $16,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · Other+6 more — $11,010 · OtherGATEWAY OF GRACE — $108,528 · Human ServicesGATEWAY OF GRACEBUCKNER INTERNATIONAL — $31,000 · Human ServicesBUCKNER INTERNATIONALLIGHT OF HOPE IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $27,000 · Human ServicesLIGHT OF HOPE IMMIGRATION LAW CE…FAITH COMMONS — $24,300 · ReligionFELLOWSHIP SOUTHWEST — $1,000 · ReligionTHE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION — $20,000 · HealthDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $6,000 · Education
Other$355,010Human Services$166,528Religion$25,300Health$20,000Education$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGATEWAY OF GRACE — $108,528 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetBUCKNER INTERNATIONAL — $31,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHT OF HOPE IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $27,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFAITH COMMONS — $24,300 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetTHE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGood Faith Media Inc — $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP SOUTHWEST — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GATEWAY OF GRACE
  • Who funds BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds LIGHT OF HOPE IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER
  • Who funds FAITH COMMONS
  • Who funds THE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION
  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Good Faith Media Inc
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP SOUTHWEST

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eula Mae and John Baugh FoundationTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eula Mae and John Baugh Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Keller Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Keller Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Keller Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph