Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Keep Driving Foundation

Our mission is to drive change in the communities we serve by setting aside a portion of every vehicle sold or serviced at one of our dealership partners to enrich the lives of children and families in need by providing the support they need to thrive.

$339k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Food & Nutrition$86kPublic Benefit$47kPhilanthropy$20kHealth$18kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $159,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $338,950 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $179,750 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $151k
$13,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$295k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Folds of Honor Patriots of Denver$47,000
Food Bank of the Rockies$41,000
Arapahoe County Foundation Inc$20,000
Full Plates Full Potential$13,200
Team Summit$10,000
Brain Injury Alliance of Colorado$10,000
Locker Project$10,000
Wyoming Rescue Mission$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Arapahoe County Foundation Inc: $20k → 8%Team Summit: $10k → 9%Brain Injury Alliance of Colorado: $10k → 12%Full Plates Full Potential: $13k → 7%An Angels Wing Inc: $8k → 13%Folds of Honor Patriots of Denver: $47k → 12%Locker Project: $10k → 7%Food Bank of the Rockies: $41k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wyoming Food Coalition Wy Food Matters
Food & Nutrition
2
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
3
Nourish Colorado

Nourish colorado is a statewide nonprofit organization committed to strengthening connections between farms and communities so that all coloradans have equitable access to fresh, nutritious foods. we pursue systemic changes through state…

Health
4
Stronger Faster Boulder Co
Recreation & Sports
5
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Urban Peak Denver

Urban peak helps youth experiencing homelessness and youth at risk of becoming homeless overcome real life challenges by providing essential services and a supportive community, empowering them to become self-sufficient adults.

Housing & Shelter
7
Freedom Revived

Freedom Revived is here to bring a proactive approach to serving those who serve us. We provide support and encouragement through a variety of services that revitalize mind, body, and spirit to our Frontline.

Human Services
8
UpRoot Colorado

UpRoot Colorado works to increase nutrition security in Colorado by harvesting and redistributing surplus agricultural crops while supporting the resilience of farmers and creating opportunities for volunteers to learn about and connect…

Food & Nutrition
9
Smart Bellies

Feeding students in summit county, colorado. smart bellies backpack food program strives to eliminate childhood hunger on the weekends by providing backpacks full of nutritious food, allowing children to get the full benefit of their…

Food & Nutrition
10
Feeding Colorado

The mission of feeding colorado, which represents the five feeding america food banks in the state, is to improve food security in colorado through policy, advocacy, partnership, and education.

Food & Nutrition
11
Colorado Friendship Inc

We are committed to saving lives and reducing suffering throughout colorado by providing food and clothing to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
12
Foothills Food Bank

The Foothills Food Bank works to ensure access to quality, nutritious food to community members in need, and deliver services with respect and dignity.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank of the Rockies and the most unlike its peers is An Angel's Wing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $41,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIESLocker Project — $17,500 · Food & NutritionLocker ProjectFULL PLATES FULL POTENTIAL — $13,200 · Food & NutritionFULL PLATES FULL POTENTIALFolds of Honor Rocky Mountain (DBA Fold of Honor Patriots of Denver) — $47,000 · Public BenefitFolds of Honor Rocky Mountain…Arapahoe County Foundation Inc — $20,000 · OtherArapahoe Cou…BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO — $10,000 · HealthBRAIN INJUR…AN ANGEL'S WING INC — $7,500 · HealthAN ANGEL'S …Wyoming Rescue Mission — $14,000 · Housing & ShelterTEAM SUMMIT — $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Food & Nutrition$71,700Public Benefit$47,000Other$20,000Health$17,500Housing & Shelter$14,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFolds of Honor Rocky Mountain (DBA Fold of Honor Patriots of Denver) — $47,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $41,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLocker Project — $17,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWyoming Rescue Mission — $14,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFULL PLATES FULL POTENTIAL — $13,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEAM SUMMIT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAN ANGEL'S WING INC — $7,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Keep Driving Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph