Skip to content

· Private foundation

Keating Thomas - Ui

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$273kReligion$194kArts & Culture$143kYouth Development$84kEducation$33kHousing & Shelter$21kHealth$19kPhilanthropy$11k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $49k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA$13,000
SAINT JOSEPHS CHURCH$13,000
BELLES LETTRES CLUB$11,600
YWCA$11,000
CALVARY CEMETERY$9,000
VENANGO YOUTH FOR CHRISTCAMPUS LIFE$7,600
SUGAR VALLEY LODGE PERSONAL CARE HOME$6,500
GOOD HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH$6,000
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC$6,000
SENECA HILLS BIBLE CAMP AND RETREAT$4,200
SECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,600
GRACE LEARNING CENTER$3,600
GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC$3,600
THE POINTE$3,600
OIL CITY CIVIC CENTER$3,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE POINTE: $4k → 14%THE POINTE: $4k → 14%THE POINTE: $4k → 14%THE POINTE: $4k → 14%THE POINTE: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$752k · 24 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -85% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
1

Total granted

$752k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-85%

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BL
    BELLES LETTRES CLUB
    8× · 2018–2025 · $88k · revenue +38%
  • GL
    GRACE LEARNING CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $33k · revenue +7%
  • CD
    CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • CY
    CORNERSTONE YOUTH HOME
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -85%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Venango County Historical Society

To promote the study of the history of venango county and its general area and to develop an interest in the study of venango county and its citizens.

Arts & Culture
2
Vincentian Child Development Center

Vincentian child development center is part of the larger vincentian collaborative system ministries, whose mission statement is: "compelled by the love of christ, vincentian collaborative system nurtures and sustains a ministry of…

—
3
Northern Columbia Community and Cultural Center

The northern columbia community and cultural center is a gathering place whose purpose is to enhance the quality of life for the those who live in, work in and/or visit northern columbia county.

Recreation & Sports
4
Community Library of Allegheny Valley

The Library is a center for informational resources and services, promoting literacy and lifelong learning. The Library has achieved the status of Family Place Library, a national initiative to encourage the beginning stages of literacy in…

—
5
Vincentian Home

Vincentian home is part of the larger vincentian collaborative system ministries, whose mission statement is: "compelled by the love of christ, vincentian collaborative system nurtures and sustains a ministry of compassionate care that…

Health
6
Penns Valley Youth Center

To provide students and families in the community with hope, worth, and friendship.

Youth Development
7
Children's Village Inc

To provide early childhood education and school-age academic enrichment distinguished by excellence and family diversity. working together with children, parents, and the community, we promote a society that is fair, compassionate, and…

Human Services
8
Venango Center for Creative Development

Provide community orienated services

Unclassified
9
Vincentian Regency

Vincentian regency (dba terrace place at vincentian) is part of the larger vincentian collaborative system ministries, whose mission statement is: "compelled by the love of christ, vincentian collaborative system nurtures and sustains a…

Health
10
Community Learning Center

Community learning center helps low-income adults in philadelphia gain academic and employment skills so they can realize their fullest potential at home and in the workforce.

—
11
Vincentian Collaborative System Charitable Foundation

Compelled by the love of christ, vincentian charitable foundation nurtures and sustains a ministry of compassionate care that preserves the human dignity of persons within a diverse and changing society. vcf exists to be a catalyst for…

—
12
Community Care and Learning Center

Community care and learning center strives to provide accessible, qualaity child care that supports parents' ability to maintain stable employment while knowing their children are in a safe, nurturing, and enriching environment.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is George Junior Republic; the most unlike its peers is Belles Lettres Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YWAC OF OIL CITY: $61,975 · OtherYWAC OF OIL CITYSAINT JOSEPHS CHURCH: $54,000 · OtherSAINT JOSEPHS CHURCHSAINT JOSEPH'S CHURCH: $44,975 · OtherSAINT JOSEPH'S CHURCHVENANGO YOUTH FOR CHRISTCAMPUS LIFE: $44,700 · OtherVENANGO YOUTH FOR CHRISTCAMPUS LIFEYMCA OF OIL CITY: $42,675 · OtherYMCA OF OIL CITYYMCA OF GREATER ERIE: $41,300 · OtherYMCA OF GREATER ERIEYMCA: $37,900 · OtherYMCASUGAR VALLEY LODGE PERSONAL CARE HOME: $32,600 · OtherSUGAR VALLEY LODGE PERSONAL CARE HOMEYWCA: $32,200 · OtherYWCAOIL CITY ARTS COUNCIL: $28,600 · OtherSECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $25,900 · OtherCalvary Cemetery: $25,300 · OtherCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $19,600 · Other+6 more: $57,400 · Other+6 moreBELLES LETTRES CLUB: $87,975 · Community ImprovementBELLES LETTR…GRACE LEARNING CENTER: $32,800 · EducationGEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC: $23,600 · EducationFAMILY SERVICE AND CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF VENANGO COUNTY: $22,300 · Crime & LegalSUGAR VALLEY LODGE INC: $13,000 · Housing & ShelterCORNERSTONE YOUTH HOME: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE POINTE: $18,700 · Human ServicesVenango Museum of Art Science and Industry: $14,400 · Arts & CultureOIL CITY CIVIC CENTER INC: $3,200 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $4,500 · Philanthropy
Other$549,125Community Improvement$87,975Education$56,400Crime & Legal$22,300Housing & Shelter$21,000Human Services$18,700Arts & Culture$17,600Philanthropy$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBELLES LETTRES CLUB: $87,975 over 8y, 16% of budgetGRACE LEARNING CENTER: $32,800 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetGEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC: $23,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE AND CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF VENANGO COUNTY: $22,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $19,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POINTE: $18,700 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetVenango Museum of Art Science and Industry: $14,400 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetSUGAR VALLEY LODGE INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF VENANGO COUNTY AND TITUSVILLE REGION: $6,700 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOIL CITY CIVIC CENTER INC: $3,200 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BELLES LETTRES CLUB ↗
  • Who funds GRACE LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Calvary Cemetery ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE AND CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF VENANGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE POINTE ↗
  • Who funds Venango Museum of Art Science and Industry ↗
  • Who funds SUGAR VALLEY LODGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE YOUTH HOME ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF VENANGO COUNTY AND TITUSVILLE REGION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds OIL CITY CIVIC CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arthur W Phillips Trust UwPA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arthur W Phillips Trust Uw · Nelson Eleanor & Rudolph-Char Tr · Elizabeth S Black Charitable Trust · Howes-Nelson Charitable Trust · Trax Virginia S for Charities - Tr · McElhattan Foundation · Bridge Builders Community Foundations Fka Venango Area Comm Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Keating Thomas - Ui funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Keating Thomas - Ui. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Keating Thomas - Ui’s filings →

    More from the funding graph