· Private foundation
Kay M Anderson Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k26 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITY OF SHENANDOAH PARK | $34,500 |
| OUR HOUSE CDC | $23,200 |
| SHENANDOAH MEDICAL CENTER | $20,000 |
| SHENANDOAH COMMUNITY SCHOOLS | $12,000 |
| VISION SHENANDOAH | $10,000 |
| GREATER SHENANDOAH FOUNDATION | $9,000 |
| SHENANDOAH MUSIC ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against -23% for those funded once.
74 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- SMSHENANDOAH MEDICAL CENTER6× · 2020–2025 · $155k · revenue +35%
- GSGREATER SHENANDOAH FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +209%
- OHOUR HOUSE CHILD DEV2× · 2017–2023 · $40k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- COCITY OF SHENADNOAH PARK AND RECone grant, 2022 · $25k
- GSGREATER SHENANDOAH HISTORICAL SOCIETYone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -82%
- SPSHENANDOAH PREGNANCY AND RESOURCE CENTERone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -55%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To encourage and assist sanford sheldon in its activities in providing health care, medical, and educational services to the region.
To provide housing for low income families.
Support educational opportunities of students and faculty of the shenandoah community school district
Bridging gaps in healthcare while providing access to a wide variety of essential services to the whole community.
To promote health and wellness within the community by providing a medical home to reduce barriers to care and ensure access to a full range of coordinated health care and wellness services.
Support and education of the homeless by providing assistance in the form of grants for rental or other housing assistance.
Promotion of health care in shelby county iowa
Mental health care to those in need
To provide financial support for the shenandoah county library system.
Local volunteer fire department
The shenandoah valley partnership (svp) works with public and private partners at the local, regional, and state level to develop an economic climate for business success throughout the shenandoah valley. through regional cooperation the…
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SHENANDOAH MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREATER SHENANDOAH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE CHILD DEV ↗
- Who funds GREATER SHENANDOAH HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SHENANDOAH PREGNANCY AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds VISION SHENANDOAH ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST IOWA FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds SHENANDOAH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cy Rapp and Carolyn Rapp Charitable Trust · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Lloyd Family Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Kay M Anderson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kay M Anderson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kay M Anderson Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Kay M Anderson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Kay M Anderson’s filings →