Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kawasaki Good Times Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$512kEducation$319kCommunity Improvement$259kPublic Safety & Disaster$203kPhilanthropy$175kHealth$100kInternational$60kHuman Services$51kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$30,000
JAPANESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
IA
CT
CA
NE
MO
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 19 repeat orgs$566k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
20

Total granted

$1.6M
$564k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
-7%

Still filing today

53%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    8× · 2017–2025 · $260k · revenue +58%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $220k · revenue +70%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2017–2019 · $105k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • ND
    Nebraska Diplomats Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $165k · revenue -61%
  • HH
    HURRICANE HELENE RELIEF EFFORTS
    one grant, 2024 · $97k
  • UM
    US MORTORCYCLE COACHING ASSOCIATI
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nebraska Defense Research Corporation

Nebraska Defense Research Corporation (NDRC) provides a bridge of trust between government, industry, and academia to support and promote technology discovery, facilitate knowledge transfer, and accelerates the transfer of command,…

Education
2
Nebraska City Tourism & Commerce Inc

Promotion of tourism, business, industry and history in the community of nebraska city, ne

—
3
Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation

The council of indepependent nebraska colleges foundation exists to provide operating funds and scholarship support for students attending nebraska's independent institutions of excellence.

—
4
Nebraska Council of School Administrators

The nebraska council of school administrators is an organization of more than 2,000 school administrators who serve in nebraska schools. we consider ourselves a partner in developing excellence in educational leadership, providing the…

—
5
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
6
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
7
North Dakota Petroleum Council Inc

The north dakota petroleum council's mission is to promote and enhance the discovery, development, production, transportation, refining, conservation, and marketing of oil and gas in north dakota, south dakota, and the rocky mountain…

Community Improvement
8
Northland Regional Chamber of Commerce

The northland regional chamber of commerce promotes growth and development in the kansas city, missouri northland area by monitoring important issues,educating members, assisting support activities, and providing a unified voice for…

—
9
Nebraska Realtors Association

Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members

—
10
Us Grains Council

The u.s. grains council is dedicated to developing markets, enabling trade, and improving lives by fostering an inclusive organization of grain producers, agribusiness organizations, and international customers, while promoting free, fair,…

—
11
Nebraska Safety Council

Provide education and leadership to empower people to live safe and healthy.

—
12
Nebraska Cultural Endowment

Support the activities of the nebraska arts council and the nebraska humanities council doing business as humanities nebraska.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Nebraska Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $260,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNebraska Diplomats Inc: $165,000 · OtherNebraska Diplomats IncSt Francis Hospital: $100,000 · OtherSt Francis HospitalHURRICANE HELENE RELIEF EFFORTS: $96,570 · OtherHURRICANE HELENE RELIEF EFFORTSNORTHWEST FOUNDATION: $85,000 · OtherNORTHWEST FOUNDATIONNew York Transit Museum: $85,000 · OtherNew York Transit MuseumIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEBRASKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY: $58,000 · OtherUS MORTORCYCLE COACHING ASSOCIATI: $50,000 · OtherLINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $45,000 · Other+19 more: $238,500 · Other+19 moreMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $260,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEU…NATIONAL CHERRY BLOSSOM FESTIVAL: $60,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CHERRY BL…FRIENDS OF THE NEW YORK TRANSIT MUSEUM: $25,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE NEW…+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $220,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $104,650 · Human ServicesUS- JAPAN COUNCIL: $60,000 · InternationalNFPA EDUCATION & TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyLINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO: $50,000 · AnimalsNODAWAY COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $24,000 · Community ImprovementBOONSLICK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $12,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,253,070Arts & Culture$355,000Education$220,000Human Services$104,650International$60,000Philanthropy$50,000Animals$50,000Community Improvement$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $260,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $220,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNebraska Diplomats Inc: $165,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $104,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUS- JAPAN COUNCIL: $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL CHERRY BLOSSOM FESTIVAL: $60,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetNEBRASKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY: $58,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNFPA EDUCATION & TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetLINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NEW YORK TRANSIT MUSEUM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNODAWAY COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $24,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetBOONSLICK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJ HIGDON POTTER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEBRASKA SPORTS COUNCIL: $5,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Nebraska Diplomats Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds US- JAPAN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHERRY BLOSSOM FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY ↗
  • Who funds NFPA EDUCATION & TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE NEW YORK TRANSIT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds NODAWAY COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds BOONSLICK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds J HIGDON POTTER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA SPORTS COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kawasaki Good Times Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kawasaki Good Times Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kawasaki Good Times Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kawasaki Good Times Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kawasaki Good Times’ filings →

    More from the funding graph