Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kauffman Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$6.0MHealth$4.1MArts & Culture$520kReligion$290kAnimals$100kCommunity Improvement$25kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $983k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.9M
$200,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS' HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA$750,000
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION$660,000
THE LOVETT SCHOOL$450,000
COLLEGE OF WOOSTER$200,000
MERCER UNIVERSITY$200,000
FERNBANK MUSEUM$200,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY - WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE$150,000
ATLANTA HUMANE SOCIETY$100,000
THE SCHENCK SCHOOL$83,333
WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER$50,000
TRINITY SCHOOL$30,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MERCER UNIVERSITY: $200k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $825k → 27%COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $200k → 10%PEACHTREE ROAD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $250k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY - WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE: $200k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $825k → 27%COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $200k → 10%EMORY UNIVERSITY - WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE: $200k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $660k → 27%COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $200k → 10%WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER: $50k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY - WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE: $175k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $350k → 27%COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $200k → 10%ATLANTA HUMANE SOCIETY: $100k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY - WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE: $150k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $300k → 27%THE LOVETT SCHOOL: $450k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY - WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE: $150k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $200k → 27%THE SCHENCK SCHOOL: $110k → 13%Winship Cancer Institute: $113k → 14%University of Georgia Foundation: $50k → 27%DYSLEXIA RESOURCE TRUST: $100k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY - WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE: $100k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA TERRY COLLEGE OF BUSINESS: $50k → 27%DYSLEXIA RESOURCE TRUST: $100k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY - WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE: $100k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA TERRY COLLEGE OF BUSINESS: $50k → 27%THE LOVETT SCHOOL: $85k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY - WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE: $100k → 14%THE SCHENCK SCHOOL: $83k → 13%THE SCHENCK SCHOOL: $83k → 13%FERNBANK MUSEUM: $200k → 14%THE SCHENCK SCHOOL: $83k → 13%FERNBANK MUSEUM: $110k → 14%THE LOVETT SCHOOL: $65k → 13%FERNBANK MUSEUM: $100k → 14%THE LOVETT SCHOOL: $65k → 13%FERNBANK MUSEUM: $60k → 14%CHILDRENS' HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $750k → 14%CHILDRENS' HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $700k → 14%CHILDRENS' HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $700k → 14%CHILDRENS' HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $120k → 14%CHILDRENS' HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $120k → 14%CHILDRENS' HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $120k → 14%CHILDRENS' HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $120k → 14%CHILDRENS' HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $120k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 11 repeat orgs$498k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$10M
$138k

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $360k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +112%
  • EU
    Emory University
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +61%
  • THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $800k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • WC
    Winship Cancer Institute
    one grant, 2017 · $113k
  • KM
    KIPP METRO ATLANTA
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Spelman College

Spelman college, a historically black college and global leader in the education of women of african descent, is dedicated to the academic excellence of its students.

Education
3
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
4
Morehouse School of Medicine

Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
9
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
10
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Readsource Inc; the most unlike its peers is Trinity School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $3,210,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATIONEmory University: $1,195,000 · EducationEmory UniversityTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $800,000 · EducationTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTERTHE LOVETT SCHOOL INC: $765,000 · EducationTHE LOVETT SCHOOL INCTHE SCHENCK SCHOOL: $479,999 · EducationTHE SCHENCK SCHOOL+2 more: $385,000 · Education+2 moreCHILDRENS' HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $2,750,000 · OtherCHILDRENS' HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTAPEACHTREE ROAD METHODIST CHURCH: $290,000 · OtherPEACHTREE ROAD METHODIST CHURCHWinship Cancer Institute: $112,500 · Other+2 more: $125,000 · OtherFernbank Inc: $470,000 · Arts & CultureROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureREADSOURCE INC: $250,000 · HealthAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $100,000 · AnimalsSPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$6,834,999Other$3,277,500Arts & Culture$520,000Health$250,000Animals$100,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $3,210,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetEmory University: $1,195,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $800,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LOVETT SCHOOL INC: $765,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SCHENCK SCHOOL: $479,999 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetFernbank Inc: $470,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetREADSOURCE INC: $250,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY SCHOOL INC: $185,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
  • Who funds THE LOVETT SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHENCK SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Fernbank Inc ↗
  • Who funds READSOURCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kauffman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kauffman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kauffman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph