· Private foundation
Katz Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k30 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $68k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MEETING HOUSE | $41,000 |
| PROVINCETOWN ART ASSOCIATION AND MUSEUM INC | $26,500 |
| RIDGEFIELD YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU | $4,000 |
| WESTPORT ANIMAL SHELTER | $3,800 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD - FEDERAL | $3,000 |
| RIDGEFIELD OPERATION FOR ANIMAL RESCUE | $2,500 |
| RIDGEFIELD CONSERVATION COMMISSION | $2,500 |
| CHIRP | $2,000 |
| TRURO CENTER FOR THE ARTS - CASTLE HILL | $2,000 |
| GUARDIANS OF RESCUE | $1,500 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| WHERE WESTPORT MEETS THE WORLD | $1,300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| MASS APPEAL INTERNATIONAL | $1,000 |
| TRURO COMMUNITY KITCHEN | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PAPROVINCETOWN ART ASSOCIATION AND MUSEUM INC8× · 2017–2024 · $198k · revenue +143%
- RORidgefield Operation for Animal Rescue Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $47k · revenue +68%
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +102%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $5k
- FOFRIENDS OF WESTON LIBRARYone grant, 2023 · $3k
- FAFINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INCone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Dedicated to the rescue, rehabilitation, and release of orphaned, injured and displaced wildlife. wildlife rescue rescues and cares for all wildlife, including native and nonnative species believing all animals are deserving of care,…
THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…
The mission of rescue life is to save the lives of wild, farm, and domestic animals which include horses, pigs, donkeys, llamas, zebras, alpacas,and dogs. the mission includes providing care, shelter, and adoption services. rescue life…
The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…
Established in 1974, the organization's mission is to find responsible homes for dogs and cats and to encourage all dog and cat owners to spay and neuter their pets.
Operation of Animal Shelter
Provide and promote humane animal welfare to pets in need.
Carolina tiger rescue's mission is saving and protecting wildcats in captivity and in the wild.
Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…
Animal rescue project saves homeless pets, one at a time, and offers socially responsible adoption services to those seeking the companionship of pets. by providing medical care to homeless pets, providing temporary shelter to them, and…
Forest Animal Rescue protects wildlife by preserving natural habitats for the safe release of rehabilitated animals and the rehabilitation and release of black bears.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Jessica Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PROVINCETOWN ART ASSOCIATION AND MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Ridgefield Operation for Animal Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RIDGEFIELD YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER NEWBURGH INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RIDGEFIELD ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE JESSICA FUND ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRURO CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds TRURO POLICE ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE TRURO MEETINGHOUSE ↗
- Who funds FINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC ↗
- Who funds WILDCARE ↗
- Who funds THE SAMPSON FUND FOR VETERINARY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds RIDGEFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Tern Foundation · Ridgefield Thrift Shop Inc · Seamens Long Point Charitable Foundation Inc · Edward Bangs Kelley and Elza Kelley Foundation Inc · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · The Clara Weiss Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Cape Cod Foundation Inc · The J R Stein Family Foundation (F/K/A the Stein Family Fund) · Joyce a Ward Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Katz Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Association to Preserve Cape Cod Inc — 100% of income from government
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Ridgefield Youth Service Bureau Inc — 31% of income from government
- Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown Inc — 27% of income from government
- Center for Coastal Studies Inc — 26% of income from government
- Ridgefield Historical Society Inc — 7% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.