Skip to content

· Private foundation

Katharine & Calvin Gatlin Scholarship Fd Co the Trust Company of Oklahoma

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$455kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA AM COLLEGE$16,875
ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY$16,875
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$11,625
OSU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$6,750
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA$4,500
PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY$1,500
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,500
SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE$1,500
NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$1,500
CENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEG OF KANSAS$1,500
DODGE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CADET ACCOUNTING SERVICES OFFICE: $4k → 14%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 10%LANGSTON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $5k → 13%OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%SOUTHWESTERN OK STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA COLLEGE: $2k → 16%NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 19%OSU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $7k → 19%NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA AM COLLEGE: $29k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS: $4k → 14%COFFEYVILLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 15%NEOSHO COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 16%PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 18%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $3k → 14%MISSOURI SOUTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 18%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $3k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $3k → 16%NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%OSU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $4k → 19%NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA AM COLLEGE: $20k → 20%PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 18%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $3k → 16%NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%OSU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $4k → 19%NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA AM COLLEGE: $17k → 20%PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 18%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $3k → 16%NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%OSU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $3k → 19%NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA AM COLLEGE: $17k → 20%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $3k → 16%NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA AM COLLEGE: $11k → 20%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 10%NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 19%NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA AM COLLEGE: $8k → 20%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 10%NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 19%NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA AM COLLEGE: $8k → 20%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 10%NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA AM COLLEGE: $7k → 20%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA AM COLLEGE: $4k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
CA
CO
MO
AZ
KS
AR
DC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$444k · 27 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
4

Total granted

$444k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+26%

Still filing today

11%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OW
    OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $9k · revenue +13%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +36%
  • GC
    Grand Canyon University
    2× · 2021–2022 · $3k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • CO
    COLLEGE OF THE OZARKSgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +26%
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +22%
  • MS
    MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
2
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
3
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
4
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Southwestern Christian University

Scu is a christ-centered liberal arts institution equipping students for a life of learning, leadership, and service; integrating faith, learning, and living; and empowering graduates to excel and to positively impact their world for jesus…

Education
7
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
8
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
9
Corban University

Corban university's goal is to equip men and women who will bring character to their communities and competence to their careers, all to the glory of christ.

Education
10
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
11
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
12
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Baptist University; the most unlike its peers is College of the Ozarks. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA AM COLLEGE: $118,968 · OtherNORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA AM COLLEGEROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $73,131 · OtherROGERS STATE UNIVERSITYOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $71,191 · OtherOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITYNORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $40,056 · OtherNORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITYOSU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $18,800 · OtherPITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $15,640 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $15,400 · Other+21 more: $81,646 · Other+21 moreOKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $9,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $3,250 · EducationGrand Canyon University: $2,666 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $2,500 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $1,550 · EducationOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationPALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC: $1,500 · EducationCENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF KANSAS: $1,500 · EducationTHE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $1,500 · Education
Other$434,832Education$24,966

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $2,666 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $1,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF KANSAS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF KANSAS ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Katharine & Calvin Gatlin Scholarship Fd Co the Trust Company of Oklahoma funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Katharine & Calvin Gatlin Scholarship Fd Co the Trust Company of Oklahoma. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Katharine & Calvin Gatlin Scholarship Fd Co the Trust Company of Oklahoma’s filings →

    More from the funding graph