Skip to content

· Public charity

Karuna Foundation

Making distributions to individuals and organizations that advocate for and/or support the wellbeing of animals, our natural environment and all global citizens, particularly by addressing humanitarian crises or deficiencies in nutrition or food systems.

$32M
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
21
States reached
$550k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Animals$21MFood & Nutrition$1.2MEducation$1.1M
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 46 grants below total $5,062,581, the rows itemized in this filing. The $32,259,910 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,197,329 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k24 grants · $585k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+7 grants · $2.7M
$45,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Skylands Animal Sanctuary and Rescue$550,000
Pro-Animal Future$475,000
Food Solutions Action$450,000
Vegan Friendly USA$423,000
Project Slingshot Inc$300,000
Effect Partners FBO Vegan Strong$270,000
Veganfta$257,560
Middle East Vegan Society Inc$245,000
Animal Alliance Asia$200,000
Food 4 Thought Festival Inc$180,938
Food Policy Pathways$160,000
Animals United Movement$150,000
Vegan Hacktivists Inc$141,766
Good Food World Foundation Inc$100,000
Plant Based Treaty SFV$84,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Pollination Project: $27k → 10%Rethink Priorities: $100k → 10%Physicians Association for Nutrition USA Inc: $10k → 10%Physicians Association for Nutrition USA: $75k → 11%Million Dollar Vegan Inc: $1.8M → 14%Animal Wellness Action: $50k → 14%Million Dollar Vegan: $115k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $26M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions, $24M to organizations and $1.4M to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$16M · 64% · 1 grant · 15 people

Stated purpose: Advocate for the wellbeing of animals.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$4.7M · 18% · 1 grant · 5 people

Stated purpose: Advocate for the wellbeing of animals.

East Asia and the Pacific$1.8M · 7% · 1 grant · 5 people

Stated purpose: Advocate for the wellbeing of animals.

Middle East and North Africa$1.0M · 4% · 1 grant · 5 people

Stated purpose: Advocate for the wellbeing of animals.

South America$825k · 3% · 1 grant · 4 people

Stated purpose: Advocate for the wellbeing of animals.

South Asia$730k · 3% · 1 grant · 4 people

Stated purpose: Advocate for the wellbeing of animals.

Russia and Neighboring States$108k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Advocate for the wellbeing of animals.

Sub-Saharan Africa$30k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Advocate for the wellbeing of animals.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 46 repeat orgs$4.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
56

Total granted

$24M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

65%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsFood & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EDUCATED CHOICES PROGRAM INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +29% · 50% of their budget
  • FS
    FOOD SOLUTIONS ACTION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $1.1M · revenue ×12 · 32% of their budget
  • PI
    PROVEG INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • GB
    GREENER BY DEFAULT
    one grant, 2023 · $360k · 33% of their budget
  • LP
    LANTERN PUBLISHING & MEDIA
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue -47% · 44% of their budget
  • OP
    Oceanic Preservation Societygraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Peaceful Prairie Sanctuary

Our mission at Peaceful Prairie Sanctuary is to provide a safe, loving and permanent home for rescued farmed animals whom are not accepted at most shelters. In addition to providing life-long care for the animals, we are dedicated to…

Animals
3
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
4
A Just World

Our mission is to promote a world where all beings live a just life of dignity and respect. To this end, we engage in practical actions, raise funds, spread understanding and foster compassion.

Animals
5
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
6
Karma Farm Sanctuary Inc
Animals
7
Animal Protection and Rescue League Inc

Exposing and eliminating animal cruelty.

Animals
8
Animal Equality

Animal equality is an international organization working with society, governments, and companies to end cruelty to farmed animals.

Animals
9
The Vegan Awareness Foundation

Working to eliminate animal suffering, reduce environmental impacts, and improve human health through a vegan diet.

Education
10
Animal Place

To provide refuge for unwanted farmed animals, to further their welfare through education of the public and to foster ethics of compassion and responsibility towards nonhuman animals by advocating a vegan lifestyle.

Animals
11
Impossible Foundation
Environment
12
A Greener World

A Greener World empowers sustainable solutions in agriculture, promoting and supporting real-life farming models to the public and offering farmers and ranchers practical guidance, resources and support on achieving truly sustainable…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farm Sanctuary Inc; the most unlike its peers is Charlies Acres. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

22
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
76/79
Grantees still filing
38/79
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Million Dollar Vegan: $3,335,592 · OtherMillion Dollar VeganVEGFUND INC: $2,460,000 · OtherVEGFUND INCEffect Partners FBO Vegan Strong: $1,420,957 · OtherEffect Partners FBO Vegan StrongVEGANFTA A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,252,984 · OtherVEGANFTA A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONPROVEG INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,100,000 · OtherPROVEG INTERNATIONAL INCWaking Justice: $729,969 · Other+52 more: $4,078,433 · Other+52 moreVEGAN FRIENDLY INC: $1,854,000 · AnimalsVEGAN FRIENDLY INCSKYLANDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY AND RESCUE INC: $1,015,000 · AnimalsSKYLANDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY …VEGAN HACKTIVISTS INC: $677,352 · AnimalsVEGAN HACKTIVISTS INCPRO-ANIMAL FUTURE: $601,500 · AnimalsPRO-ANIMAL FUTUREASHA'S FARM SANCTUARY INC: $554,247 · AnimalsASHA'S FARM SANCTUARY INC+34 more: $1,806,588 · Animals+34 moreFOOD SOLUTIONS ACTION: $1,100,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD SOLUTION…BETTER FOOD FOUNDATION INC: $1,091,180 · Food & NutritionBETTER FOOD F…GREENER BY DEFAULT: $360,000 · Food & NutritionGREENER BY DE…FOOD 4 THOUGHT INNOVATIONS INC: $230,938 · Food & NutritionFOOD 4 THOUGH…BETTER HEALTH BETTER LIFE INC: $162,500 · Food & NutritionVEGAN OUTREACH INC: $146,000 · Food & Nutrition+8 more: $357,000 · Food & Nutrition+8 moreMILLION DOLLAR VEGAN INC: $1,898,833 · Human ServicesRethink Priorities: $100,000 · Human ServicesPHYSICIANS ASSOCIATION FOR NUTRITION USA INC: $85,000 · Human Services+2 more: $77,250 · Human ServicesEDUCATED CHOICES PROGRAM INC: $1,102,000 · Education+4 more: $80,000 · EducationOceanic Preservation Society: $150,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $56,250 · EnvironmentLANTERN PUBLISHING & MEDIA: $150,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$14,377,935Animals$6,508,687Food & Nutrition$3,447,618Human Services$2,161,083Education$1,182,000Environment$206,250Arts & Culture$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVEGFUND INC: $2,460,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetMILLION DOLLAR VEGAN INC: $1,898,833 over 2y, 100% of budgetVEGAN FRIENDLY INC: $1,854,000 over 4y, 92% of budgetEDUCATED CHOICES PROGRAM INC: $1,102,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetFOOD SOLUTIONS ACTION: $1,100,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetPROVEG INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,100,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetBETTER FOOD FOUNDATION INC: $1,091,180 over 2y, 40% of budgetSKYLANDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY AND RESCUE INC: $1,015,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetPRO-ANIMAL FUTURE: $601,500 over 3y, 25% of budgetASHA'S FARM SANCTUARY INC: $554,247 over 3y, 85% of budgetGREENER BY DEFAULT: $360,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetFOOD 4 THOUGHT INNOVATIONS INC: $230,938 over 2y, 62% of budgetPEACE 4 ANIMALS: $205,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetAnimal Alliance Asia: $200,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetBETTER HEALTH BETTER LIFE INC: $162,500 over 2y, 20% of budgetLANTERN PUBLISHING & MEDIA: $150,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetOceanic Preservation Society: $150,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetVEGAN OUTREACH INC: $146,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ANIMAL HAPPINESS: $135,600 over 2y, 33% of budgetSEED STRATEGIES FOR ETHICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT INC: $123,250 over 2y, 46% of budgetRethink Priorities: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetIMAGINE FARM: $91,793 over 3y, 55% of budgetANIMAL & VEGAN ADVOCACY INTERNATIONAL INC: $85,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPHYSICIANS ASSOCIATION FOR NUTRITION USA INC: $85,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetPEOPLE FOR BETTER FOOD: $80,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetCATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $72,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGIVE BACK HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $71,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetJEWISH VEGAN LIFE INC: $70,500 over 2y, 78% of budgetCASA VEGANA INC: $62,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $56,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRowdy Girl Sanctuary Inc: $56,164 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION: $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetOUR PLANET THEIRS TOO INC: $50,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetCOMPETITIVE MARKETS ACTION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetUPSTREAM AQUATIC INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetGame Changers Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetTHRIVE PHILANTHROPY INCORPORATED: $50,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetLuvin Arms: $45,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWORLD ANIMAL PROTECTION: $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetARTHROPODA FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetSimple Heart Initiative: $34,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetA Well-Fed World: $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBroken Shovels Farm and Sanctuary School: $30,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCENTER FOR JEWISH FOOD ETHICS: $30,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetTHE POLLINATION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $27,250 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPROJECT ANIMAL FREEDOM: $27,226 over 2y, 18% of budgetTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $27,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VEGFUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MILLION DOLLAR VEGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds VEGAN FRIENDLY INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATED CHOICES PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD SOLUTIONS ACTION ↗
  • Who funds PROVEG INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BETTER FOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SKYLANDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY AND RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds VEGAN HACKTIVISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRO-ANIMAL FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds ASHA'S FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENER BY DEFAULT ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST VEGAN SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD 4 THOUGHT INNOVATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACE 4 ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Animal Alliance Asia ↗
  • Who funds BETTER HEALTH BETTER LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds LANTERN PUBLISHING & MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds Animals United Movement ↗
  • Who funds Oceanic Preservation Society ↗
  • Who funds VEGAN OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ANIMAL HAPPINESS ↗
  • Who funds SEED STRATEGIES FOR ETHICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Rethink Priorities ↗
  • Who funds THE ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Humane America Animal FoundationCA36.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Humane America Animal Foundation · The Quinn Foundation · Vegfund Inc · Animal Charity Evaluators · The Greenbaum Foundation · A Well-Fed World · Effective Ventures Foundation USA Inc · The Humane League · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Susan Michaels Compassion Trust · Kh Dominion Foundation 5507-21-40 · Tipping Point Private Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Karuna Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Karuna Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    16get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Karuna Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Karuna Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 124 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Karuna’s filings →

    More from the funding graph