Skip to content
Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals at a glance

· Private foundation

Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$93k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$634kHuman Services$49kArts & Culture$25kHealth$16kFood & Nutrition$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $83k
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALEM FRIENDS OF FELINES$30,000
PROJECT POOCH$15,000
CENTER FOR HOPE & SAFETY$15,000
MARION POLK FOOD SHARE$12,500
SILVERTON CAT RESCUE$10,000
EXOTIC BIRD RESCUE OF OREGON$5,000
GREEN ACRES FARM SANCTUARY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WILLIAMETTE VITAL HEALTH: $10k → 13%WILLAMETTE VALLEY HOSPICE: $4k → 13%WILLAMETTE VALLEY HOSPICE: $2k → 13%CENTER FOR HOPE & SAFETY: $15k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE & SAFETY: $12k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE & SAFETY: $10k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE & SAFETY: $8k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE & SAFETY: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$753k · 19 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
3

Total granted

$753k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+11%

Still filing today

79%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SALEM FRIENDS OF FELINES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $235k · revenue +211%
  • CAT ADOPTION TEAM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $87k · revenue +71%
  • CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY
    5× · 2018–2025 · $49k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • SG
    SAFARI GAME SEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +11%
  • SD
    SALEM DOGS
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • CO
    CENTRAL OREGON ANIMAL FRIENDS HOME AT LAST HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cats Meow Cat Rescue

To provide care to feral, stray, and abandoned felines.

Animals
2
Sos Lost Pet Rescue Nw Inc

Decrease over population of feral cats by trapping and doing spay or neuter. Provide veterinarian care to kittens. Take owner relinquishments of pets they can no longer care for. Taking in abandoned animals and providing veterinary care.…

Animals
3
Cats Cradle Rescue

Helped adopt over 200 felines and rehome over 50 other felines in the Portland Metro area.

Animals
4
Oregon Friends of Shelter Animals

Rescue, rehabilitate and rehome companion animals

Animals
5
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
6
Saving Animals in Need Today

Cat care and cat adoption - intake homeless owner surrendered cats provide them with veterinary care feed and house them until adopted

Animals
7
Tillamook Animal Shelter Inc

Boarding stray animals, providing necessary medical care and adopting out the animals to new homes.

Animals
8
Mewtopia Cat Rescue

Pet adoption and care

Animals
9
Cat Tail Farms Feline Sanctuary

Animal rescue and housing

Animals
10
Pet Organization Urging Neutering Care & Education

Rescue and rehome abandoned cats and kittens.

Animals
11
All About the Cats Rescue Inc

Rescue, save and possibly re-home animals in need.

Animals
12
Imaginepeaceforpupsrescue

Rescue Dogs and Cats from high kill shelters owner surrenders and abandoned animals Provide vetting and microchipping Get them health certificates for transport to Oregon and Washington state and find them forever homes We arrange fosters…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cat Adoption Team; the most unlike its peers is Friends Involved in Dog Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALEM FRIENDS OF FELINES: $235,000 · AnimalsSALEM FRIENDS OF FELINESCAT ADOPTION TEAM: $87,000 · AnimalsCAT ADOPTION TEAMTHE PONGO FUND: $35,000 · AnimalsTHE PONGO FUNDSILVERTON CAT RESCUE: $25,000 · AnimalsSILVERTON CAT RESCUECOALITION ADVOCATING FOR ANIMALS: $18,000 · AnimalsCHINTIMINI WILDLIFE CENTER: $17,150 · Animals+5 more: $47,750 · Animals+5 moreWILLAMETTE HUMANE SOCIETY: $57,800 · OtherWILLAMETTE HUMANE SOCIETYFERAL CAT COALITION: $55,450 · OtherFERAL CAT COALITIONIndividual grant recipient: $46,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAFARI GAME SEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherSAFARI GAME SEARCH FOUNDAT…+3 more: $12,500 · Other+3 moreCENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $48,750 · Human ServicesCENTER FO…WILLAMETTE VITAL HEALTH: $16,250 · Human ServicesWILLAMETT…PROJECT POOCH: $33,750 · Crime & LegalHIGH DESERT MUSEUM: $24,500 · Arts & CultureMARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC: $12,500 · Food & Nutrition
Animals$464,900Other$182,250Human Services$65,000Crime & Legal$33,750Arts & Culture$24,500Food & Nutrition$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSALEM FRIENDS OF FELINES: $235,000 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetCAT ADOPTION TEAM: $87,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWILLAMETTE HUMANE SOCIETY: $57,800 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $48,750 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE PONGO FUND: $35,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT POOCH: $33,750 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetSILVERTON CAT RESCUE: $25,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetHIGH DESERT MUSEUM: $24,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION ADVOCATING FOR ANIMALS: $18,000 over 6y, 9.4% of budgetCHINTIMINI WILDLIFE CENTER: $17,150 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetWILLAMETTE VITAL HEALTH: $16,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWildcat Ridge Sanctuary: $13,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN ACRES FARM SANCTUARY: $9,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetEXOTIC BIRD RESCUE OF OREGON: $9,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetFriends Involved in Dog Outreach: $8,500 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetMEOW VILLAGE: $8,250 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTURTLE RIDGE WILD LIFE CENTER: $5,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON ANIMAL FRIENDS HOME AT LAST HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Maps Community Founda…Leslie G Ehmann TrustThe Larson LegacyThe Autzen FoundationFirst Interstate Banc…Barbara Emily Knudson…The Duffield Family F…Marie Lamfrom Charita…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Paypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR26.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Maps Community Foundation · Leslie G Ehmann Trust · The Larson Legacy · The Autzen Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Barbara Emily Knudson Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Center for Hope and Safety: 68% of income from government
  • High Desert Museum: 11% of income from government
  • Marion-Polk Food Share Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Safari Game Search Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Willamette Vital Health: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home