Skip to content

Wisconsin · Private foundation

Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$93k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
7
Grants FY2025
11
Organizations funded FY2024
27%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$12,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$30,000
Organizations funded a year
7 to 14
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$1.6M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 27% of the organizations Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals funded were first-time grantees, receiving 18% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving7$93k14%
FY202411$73k27%
FY20238$70k25%
FY20227$109k0%
FY20218$92k0%
FY202012$91k8%
FY201914$103k43%
FY20188$76k38%
95% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$634kHuman Services$49kArts & Culture$25kHealth$16kFood & Nutrition$13kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Salem Friends of Felines$235,00087%
Cat Adoption Team$87,00081%
Willamette Humane Society$57,80051%
Center for Hope and Safety$48,75050%
The Pongo Fund$35,00050%
Project Pooch$33,75045%
Silverton Cat Rescue$25,000310%
High Desert Museum$24,50070%
Coalition Advocating for Animals$18,00069%
Chintimini Wildlife Center$17,15033%
Show all 21 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($102k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSalem Friends of Felines: $235,000 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetCat Adoption Team: $87,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWillamette Humane Society: $57,800 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCenter for Hope and Safety: $48,750 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetThe Pongo Fund: $35,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetProject Pooch: $33,750 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetSilverton Cat Rescue: $25,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetHigh Desert Museum: $24,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCoalition Advocating for Animals: $18,000 over 6y, 9.4% of budgetChintimini Wildlife Center: $17,150 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetWillamette Vital Health: $16,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWildcat Ridge Sanctuary: $13,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMarion-Polk Food Share Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGreen Acres Farm Sanctuary: $9,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetExotic Bird Rescue of Oregon: $9,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetFriends Involved in Dog Outreach: $8,500 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetMeow Village: $8,250 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTurtle Ridge Wild Life Center: $5,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCentral Oregon Animal Friends Home at Last Humane Society: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR26.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Maps Community Foundation · Leslie G Ehmann Trust · The Larson Legacy · The Autzen Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Barbara Emily Knudson Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals with peer funders

About Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals

How much does Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals give?
Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals reported 7 grants totaling $92,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 14 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (81%), Human Services (6%), Arts & Culture (3%).
Who are Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Salem Friends of Felines ($235k), Cat Adoption Team ($87k), Willamette Humane Society ($58k).
Does Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 27% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Oregon Community Foundation, Maps Community Foundation, Leslie G Ehmann Trust.
Where is Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals based?
Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals is based in WI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Karen Schroth Foundation for Animals’ filings →

More from the funding graph