Skip to content
KAP 508 Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

KAP 508 Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$157kHuman Services$93kYouth Development$43kFood & Nutrition$42kArts & Culture$41kEducation$32kEnvironment$19kCrime & Legal$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC$8,000
NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH SHELTER$8,000
WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHEST$7,500
THE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE$7,500
WRC INC$7,000
INDIGO SPOON FOUNDATION$5,000
KIDS CLUB OF TARRYTOWN & SLEEPY HOLLOW INC$5,000
UNITED METHODIST CHURCH AND ITS ADFFILIATED ORGANI$3,000
COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY OF SLEEPY HOLLOW TARRYTOWN$2,000
HORSEMANS HARVEST NEIGHBORHOOD PANTRY INC$2,000
AUTISMUP INC$2,000
PTA NEW YORK CONGRESS$1,500
RSHM LIFE CENTER INC$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $10k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $10k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $10k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $10k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $10k → 9%WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHEST: $8k → 14%WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHEST: $5k → 14%WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHEST: $2k → 14%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$420k · 32 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
12

Total granted

$420k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+5%

Still filing today

88%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER
    5× · 2017–2023 · $50k · revenue +52%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +169%
  • NP
    NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH SHELTER DBA NEPA YOUTH SHELTER
    4× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +209%

Funded once

  • KW
    KELLER WILLIAMS REALTY CARES
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -52%
  • PM
    PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CENTER - HOSPICE PROGRAM
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • LH
    LAURAS HOPE RESCUE
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wmc-New York Inc

Wmc new york, inc. shall at all times be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 170(c)(2)(b) and 501(c)(3) of the code, and for the purpose of engaging in various activities…

Health
2
Washingtonville Housing Alliance

To preserve and enhance the quality of life in the village of mamaroneck and the surrounding area. wha constructs new housing and improves existing housing for low and moderate income residents and undertakes other supportive activities…

—
3
Westchester Land Trust Inc

The primary mission of the Westchester Land Trust is to conserve, maintain and enhance the natural environment and resources of Westchester County and eastern Putnam County. The Trust acquires interests in land exhibiting important natural…

Environment
4
Western New York Bloodcare Foundation in

Western new york bloodcare foundation, inc. is organized for the charitable purpose of operating exclusively to benefit, perform the functions of, and carry out the purposes of western new york bloodcare, inc.

Health
5
The Legal Aid Society of Westchester County

Securing justice for, protecting the rights of and rendering legal assistance and representation to indigent residents and non-residents of westchester county.

—
6
Humane Society of Yates County

The humane society of yates county exists to promote the welfare of companion and domestic animals through educational programs and initiatives that reduce pet overpopulation, enrich adoptions, and encourage responsible pet ownership.

Animals
7
Mid-Hudson Valley Early Education Center

Develop, maintain, and advance programs to empower children to learn and grow through a variety of learning opportunities and experiences.

Education
8
Ronald Mcdonald House of New York Inc

Our mission is to provide a strong, caring and seamless circle of support for patients of pediatric cancer and other complex illnesses and their families. in recent years rmhny has expanded its footprint across the boroughs and extended…

Health
9
Croton-Cortlandt Food Pantry

Croton Cortlandt Food Pantry's primary mission is to provide food assistance to families and individuals who are food insecure and have difficulty meeting their basic nutritional needs on their own. The pantry also provides diapers and…

Food & Nutrition
10
Healthcare Choices Ny Inc

Healthcare choices ny, inc., a federally qualified health center licensed by the state of new york is an outpatient health center providing community based health services primarily to persons who may have a mental health diagnosis or be…

Health
11
Brightpoint Health

Brightpoint health drives dramatic improvements in the health of new yorkers. brightpoint health delivers high quality, person centered, integrated care resulting in improved health outcomes for people, families, and communities challenged…

—
12
Ronald McDonald House Charities New York Metro Inc

Our Mission is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Hudson Valley; the most unlike its peers is Burn Care Everywhere Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/40
Grantees still filing
29/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTCHESTER ARC FOUNDATION INC: $19,000 · HealthWESTCHESTER ARC FOUNDAT…Westchester Medical Center Foundation: $19,000 · HealthWestchester Medical Cen…BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $14,500 · HealthBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S H…PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $14,000 · HealthPHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITA…AUTISMUP INC: $12,000 · HealthAUTISMUP INCBURN CARE EVERYWHERE FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · HealthBURN CARE EVERYWHERE FO…LUCKY FIN PROJECT: $6,000 · HealthLUCKY FIN PROJECT+3 more: $5,000 · HealthWRC INC: $17,000 · OtherWRC INCFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $14,000 · OtherFEEDING WESTCHESTER INCWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $13,000 · OtherWOMENS RESOURCE CENTERMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $10,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDS…RESOLVE OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $8,000 · OtherRESOLVE OF GREATER ROCHESTER INCABBY S PROMISE INC: $6,000 · OtherPHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CENTER - HOSPICE PROGRAM: $5,000 · OtherCommunity Food Pantry of Sleepy Hollow Tarrytown: $7,000 · OtherTHE INDIGO SPOON FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherKELLER WILLIAMS REALTY CARES: $10,000 · OtherKELLER WILLIAMS REALTY CARESLAURAS HOPE RESCUE: $5,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF LACKAWANNA COUNTY: $5,000 · OtherWAVERLY COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $9,000 · OtherWAVERLY COMMUNITY HOUSE INC+10 more: $31,000 · Other+10 moreELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $50,000 · Human ServicesELIZABETH MASCIA C…WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $14,500 · Human ServicesWILLOW DOMESTIC VI…Ossining Food Pantry: $12,000 · Human ServicesOssining Food Pant…NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH SHELTER DBA NEPA YOUTH SHELTER: $31,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHEASTERN …KIDS CLUB OF TARRYTOWN & SLEEPY HOLLOW INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS CLUB OF …EMERGENCY CHILDRENS HELP ORGANIZATION: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentEMERGENCY CHI…OPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 · PhilanthropyOPEN DOOR…THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $2,000 · PhilanthropyROCHESTER MUSEUM & SCIENCE CENTER: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $9,500 · Arts & CultureJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC: $14,500 · EducationDASAP Inc: $9,000 · EducationHORSEMEN PTA: $1,500 · Education
Health$97,500Other$145,000Human Services$76,500Youth Development$55,000Philanthropy$40,000Arts & Culture$36,500Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $50,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetOPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH SHELTER DBA NEPA YOUTH SHELTER: $31,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetROCHESTER MUSEUM & SCIENCE CENTER: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS CLUB OF TARRYTOWN & SLEEPY HOLLOW INC: $20,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetWESTCHESTER ARC FOUNDATION INC: $19,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWestchester Medical Center Foundation: $19,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC: $14,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $14,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISMUP INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetOssining Food Pantry: $12,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetKELLER WILLIAMS REALTY CARES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $9,500 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetDASAP Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetRESOLVE OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $8,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetBURN CARE EVERYWHERE FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetCommunity Food Pantry of Sleepy Hollow Tarrytown: $7,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLUCKY FIN PROJECT: $6,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTHE INDIGO SPOON FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 75% of budgetLAURAS HOPE RESCUE: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF LACKAWANNA COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY CHILDRENS HELP ORGANIZATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHorsemans Harvest Neighborhood Pantry Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetGULLOTTA HOUSE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS DREAM FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetRSHM Life Center: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCALCAGNINI ALS FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDING HOMES FOR HEROES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ROCKEFELLER STATE PARK PRESERVE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHORSEMEN PTA: $1,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetKYLE GOLDBERG MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rochester Area Commun…Waldron Rise Foundati…The Polisseni Foundat…The New York Communit…Scranton Area Foundat…Greater Rochester Hea…Max and Marian Farash…United Way of Greater…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Hudson Road Foundatio…Paychex Charitable Fo…Daisy Marquis Jones F…
Rochester Area Community FoundationNY15.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · Waldron Rise Foundation Inc · The Polisseni Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Scranton Area Foundation Inc · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Hudson Road Foundation Inc · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization KAP 508 Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from KAP 508 Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to KAP 508 Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to KAP 508 Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on KAP 508’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home