· Private foundation
KAP 508 Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC | $8,000 |
| NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH SHELTER | $8,000 |
| WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHEST | $7,500 |
| THE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE | $7,500 |
| WRC INC | $7,000 |
| INDIGO SPOON FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| KIDS CLUB OF TARRYTOWN & SLEEPY HOLLOW INC | $5,000 |
| UNITED METHODIST CHURCH AND ITS ADFFILIATED ORGANI | $3,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY OF SLEEPY HOLLOW TARRYTOWN | $2,000 |
| HORSEMANS HARVEST NEIGHBORHOOD PANTRY INC | $2,000 |
| AUTISMUP INC | $2,000 |
| PTA NEW YORK CONGRESS | $1,500 |
| RSHM LIFE CENTER INC | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EMELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER5× · 2017–2023 · $50k · revenue +52%
- ODOPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +169%
- NPNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH SHELTER DBA NEPA YOUTH SHELTER4× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +209%
Funded once
- KWKELLER WILLIAMS REALTY CARESone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -52%
- HSHUMANE SOCIETY OF LACKAWANNA COUNTYone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +5%
- LHLAURAS HOPE RESCUEone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wmc new york, inc. shall at all times be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 170(c)(2)(b) and 501(c)(3) of the code, and for the purpose of engaging in various activities…
To preserve and enhance the quality of life in the village of mamaroneck and the surrounding area. wha constructs new housing and improves existing housing for low and moderate income residents and undertakes other supportive activities…
The primary mission of the Westchester Land Trust is to conserve, maintain and enhance the natural environment and resources of Westchester County and eastern Putnam County. The Trust acquires interests in land exhibiting important natural…
Western new york bloodcare foundation, inc. is organized for the charitable purpose of operating exclusively to benefit, perform the functions of, and carry out the purposes of western new york bloodcare, inc.
Securing justice for, protecting the rights of and rendering legal assistance and representation to indigent residents and non-residents of westchester county.
The humane society of yates county exists to promote the welfare of companion and domestic animals through educational programs and initiatives that reduce pet overpopulation, enrich adoptions, and encourage responsible pet ownership.
Develop, maintain, and advance programs to empower children to learn and grow through a variety of learning opportunities and experiences.
Our mission is to provide a strong, caring and seamless circle of support for patients of pediatric cancer and other complex illnesses and their families. in recent years rmhny has expanded its footprint across the boroughs and extended…
Croton Cortlandt Food Pantry's primary mission is to provide food assistance to families and individuals who are food insecure and have difficulty meeting their basic nutritional needs on their own. The pantry also provides diapers and…
Healthcare choices ny, inc., a federally qualified health center licensed by the state of new york is an outpatient health center providing community based health services primarily to persons who may have a mental health diagnosis or be…
Brightpoint health drives dramatic improvements in the health of new yorkers. brightpoint health delivers high quality, person centered, integrated care resulting in improved health outcomes for people, families, and communities challenged…
Our Mission is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Hudson Valley and the most unlike its peers is Burn Care Everywhere Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH SHELTER DBA NEPA YOUTH SHELTER ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER MUSEUM & SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds KIDS CLUB OF TARRYTOWN & SLEEPY HOLLOW INC ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER ARC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Westchester Medical Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds THE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISMUP INC ↗
- Who funds Ossining Food Pantry ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds KELLER WILLIAMS REALTY CARES ↗
- Who funds THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds DASAP Inc ↗
- Who funds WAVERLY COMMUNITY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds RESOLVE OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds BURN CARE EVERYWHERE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Community Food Pantry of Sleepy Hollow Tarrytown ↗
- Who funds LUCKY FIN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE INDIGO SPOON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF LACKAWANNA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds LAURAS HOPE RESCUE ↗
- Who funds PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY CHILDRENS HELP ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds Horsemans Harvest Neighborhood Pantry Inc ↗
- Who funds BLACK SCRANTON PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds GULLOTTA HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · Waldron Rise Foundation Inc · The Polisseni Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Scranton Area Foundation Inc · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Hudson Road Foundation Inc · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization KAP 508 Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to KAP 508 Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to KAP 508 Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.