Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kanitz Louis J & Golda I Main Ac

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MEducation$788kHealth$31kYouth Development$24k
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LA$100,000
BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH$100,000
WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY$5,000
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$5,000
SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$5,000
FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$4,000
FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY$4,000
FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY$4,000
MUSKEGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LA: $115k → 14%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%DIOCESE OF GRAND RAPIDS: $82k → 11%BAKER COLLEGE OF OWOSSO: $4k → 12%BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $115k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 14%SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%MUSKEGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 15%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $5k → 21%AQUINAS COLLEGE: $4k → 14%CENTRAL ST UNIV FBO DEZIRAYE WILSON: $3k → 9%GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 32%ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LA: $110k → 14%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%DIOCESE OF GRAND RAPIDS: $82k → 11%BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $110k → 12%UNIV OF MICHIGAN FBO NAOMI TOLLIVER: $5k → 14%BAKER COLLEGE OF MUSKEGON: $4k → 15%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 20%ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LA: $100k → 14%GRAND VALLEY ST UNIV FBO: $5k → 8%BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $100k → 12%UNIV OF MICHIGAN FBO TAYLA WILSON: $4k → 14%MUSKEGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 15%MICHIGAN ST UNIV FBO TIERA WINTERS: $4k → 16%FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LA: $100k → 14%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 8%BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $100k → 12%MUSKEGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 15%FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LA: $90k → 14%BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $90k → 12%MUSKEGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 15%FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LA: $84k → 14%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%MUSKEGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 15%ARCHDIOCESE OF LOS ANGELES: $82k → 14%ARCHDIOCESE OF LOS ANGELES: $82k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
OH
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
LA
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 48 repeat orgs$281k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
65

Total granted

$2.0M
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-2%

Still filing today

21%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    4× · 2018–2025 · $31k · revenue +195%
  • WM
    WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $18k · revenue +149%
  • AC
    AQUINAS COLLEGE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $9k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • MC
    MUSKEGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FBO
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
  • GV
    GRAND VALLEY ST UNIV FBO
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +82%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
3
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
4
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
5
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
10
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
11
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Albion College; the most unlike its peers is Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $599,000 · OtherBISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCHROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LA: $599,000 · OtherROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LADIOCESE OF GRAND RAPIDS: $164,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF GRAND RAPIDSARCHDIOCESE OF LOS ANGELES: $164,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF LOS ANGELES+98 more: $648,500 · Other+98 moreWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $18,000 · EducationAQUINAS COLLEGE: $9,000 · EducationLAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $5,000 · EducationADRIAN COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $5,000 · EducationThe George Washington University: $5,000 · EducationGEORGIA GWINNETT COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · EducationCornerstone University: $3,500 · EducationKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $3,000 · EducationAquinas College: $3,000 · EducationUniversity of Mount Union: $3,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3,000 · EducationDAVENPORT UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · Education+3 more: $4,000 · EducationBurr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State: $23,500 · Youth Development
Other$2,174,500Education$86,000Youth Development$23,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $30,500 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAQUINAS COLLEGE: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADRIAN COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA GWINNETT COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCornerstone University: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAquinas College: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAVENPORT UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALBION COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALMA COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AQUINAS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Myer & Lois Franklin Charitable TrMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Myer & Lois Franklin Charitable Tr · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Speerstra Peter & Evelyn · The Allegan County Community Foundation · The Gerber Foundation · Community Foundation for Muskegon County · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Charles Koch Foundation · Fred & Florence Dengler Scholarship Fund · The VombergTrumley Foundation · S Gary Spicer Sr Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kanitz Louis J & Golda I Main Ac funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kanitz Louis J & Golda I Main Ac. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 121 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kanitz Louis J & Golda I Main Ac’s filings →

    More from the funding graph