Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The VombergTrumley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$285kArts & Culture$1k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Michigan State University$9,000
University of Olivet$6,000
Lansing Community College$5,000
Michigan Tech University$5,000
Kellogg Community College$4,000
Central Michigan University$3,000
Davenport University$2,000
Grand Valley State University$2,000
Great Lakes Christian College$2,000
Spring Arbor University$2,000
Trine University$2,000
Dartmouth$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Martin Luther College: $3k → 8%Grand Valley State University: $6k → 8%Oakland University: $2k → 8%Northwood University: $2k → 9%Great Lakes Christian College: $2k → 9%Aquinas College: $2k → 11%Northern Michigan University: $2k → 11%Western Michigan University: $4k → 12%Eastern Michigan University: $3k → 14%Kellogg Community College: $5k → 14%Saginaw Valley State University: $4k → 14%Michigan Tech University: $5k → 14%Lansing Community College: $5k → 16%Central Michigan University: $6k → 19%Ferris State University: $3k → 20%Trine University: $4k → 9%Indiana Wesleyan University: $3k → 19%Grand Valley State University: $5k → 8%University of Olivet: $6k → 9%Western Michigan University: $3k → 12%Kellogg Community College: $4k → 14%Saginaw Valley State University: $3k → 14%Lansing Community College: $5k → 16%Central Michigan University: $5k → 19%Grand Valley State University: $5k → 8%Olivet College: $5k → 9%Western Michigan University: $3k → 12%Lansing Community College: $4k → 16%Central Michigan University: $4k → 19%Grand Valley State University: $3k → 8%Olivet College: $5k → 9%Lansing Community College: $4k → 16%Central Michigan University: $3k → 19%Grand Valley State University: $3k → 8%Olivet College: $4k → 9%Lansing Community College: $3k → 16%Grand Valley University: $3k → 8%Olivet College: $3k → 9%Davenport College: $3k → 16%Albion College: $3k → 14%Lansing Community College: $3k → 16%Michigan State University: $10k → 16%Michigan State University: $9k → 16%Michigan State University: $9k → 16%Michigan State University: $9k → 16%Michigan State University: $8k → 16%Michigan State University: $7k → 16%Michigan State University: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$265k · 22 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
3

Total granted

$265k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+4%

Still filing today

32%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OLIVET COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +25%
  • IW
    INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $9k · revenue +27%
  • TU
    Trine University
    3× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • NU
    Northwood University
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +4%
  • WS
    Wayne State University
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • GR
    GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue -17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
2
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
3
University of Rio Grande

The university of rio grande/ rio grande community college is america's unique private/public institution of higher education designed to provide learners the opportunity to attain a high-quality, high-value education. our personalized,…

Education
4
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
5
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
6
Gardner-Webb University

The university statement of values consists of christian heritage, baptist heritage, academic excellence, liberal arts, teamwork, a student-centered focus, community engagement and diversity.

Education
7
Johnson University

Johnson university is a private, coeducational institution of higher learning offering associate, bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees.

Education
8
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
11
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
12
Bradley University

Bradley university empowers students for immediate and sustained success in their personal and professional endeavors by combining professional preparation, liberal arts and sciences, and co-curricular experiences. alongside our dedication…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olivet College and the most unlike its peers is The Dartmouth Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $60,500 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY — $26,500 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYLansing Community College — $23,500 · OtherLansing Community CollegeCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY — $22,500 · OtherCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYSAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY — $12,500 · OtherSAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY — $11,500 · OtherKellogg Community College — $11,000 · OtherMARTIN LUTHER COLLEGE — $8,000 · Other+11 more — $43,000 · Other+11 moreOLIVET COLLEGE — $20,500 · EducationOLIVET COLLEGEINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $8,500 · EducationINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSI…Trine University — $7,000 · EducationTrine UniversityDAVENPORT UNIVERSITY — $6,000 · EducationDAVENPORT UNIVERSITYADRIAN COLLEGE — $4,500 · EducationADRIAN COLLEGEAquinas College — $4,500 · EducationAquinas CollegeALBION COLLEGE — $4,000 · EducationALBION COLLEGESpring Arbor University — $4,000 · EducationSpring Arbor University+2 more — $4,000 · Education+2 more
Other$219,000Education$63,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOLIVET COLLEGE — $20,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTrine University — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDAVENPORT UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADRIAN COLLEGE — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAquinas College — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALBION COLLEGE — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSpring Arbor University — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwood University — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES BIBLE COLLEGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OLIVET COLLEGE
  • Who funds INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Trine University
  • Who funds DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ADRIAN COLLEGE
  • Who funds Aquinas College
  • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE
  • Who funds Spring Arbor University
  • Who funds Northwood University
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES BIBLE COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE DARTMOUTH INC
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Myer & Lois Franklin Charitable TrMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Myer & Lois Franklin Charitable Tr · The Gerber Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Speerstra Peter & Evelyn · Michigan Colleges Alliance · Fred & Florence Dengler Scholarship Fund · Kanitz Louis J & Golda I Main Ac · The Alvin L Glick Foundation · Frey Foundation · Community Foundation for Muskegon County · Charles Koch Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The VombergTrumley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The VombergTrumley Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The VombergTrumley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph