Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Kanawha Valley Collective Inc

The kanawha valley collective is a collaborative network dedicated to preventing and eridicating homelessness by improving homeless services and removing barriers to housing in kanawha, boone, clay and putnam counties.

$1.5M
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$613k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Human Services$734kHousing & Shelter$574kArts & Culture$363kPhilanthropy$15k
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $113k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$112,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$593k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC$612,500
HUNTINGTON CITY MISSION$362,500
CLARKSBURG MISSIONS INC$362,500
UNION RESCUE MISSION INC$112,500
BREAM$15,125
DAYMARK INC$15,125
YWCA CHARLESTON$15,125
RELIGIOUS COALITION FOR COMMUNITY RENEWAL$7,870
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $234k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $113k → 15%YWCA CHARLESTON: $15k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $15k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $15k → 18%YMCA OF THE KANAWHA VALLEY INC: $15k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $15k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $15k → 18%YMCA OF THE KANAWHA VALLEY INC: $15k → 18%YMCA OF THE KANAWHA VALLEY INC: $15k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

13%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$212k · 4 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$212k
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+49%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YO
    YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $61k · revenue +52%
  • DI
    DAYMARK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $61k · revenue +31%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue -15%

Funded once

  • UM
    UNION MISSION MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $613k · revenue +29%
  • CM
    CLARKSBURG MISSION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $363k · revenue +2% · 38% of their budget
  • HC
    HUNTINGTON CITY MISSION
    one grant, 2023 · $363k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

2
The Union Mission

The union mission seeks to be a leader in gospel transforming ministry in hampton roads, providing a pathway to success for our homeless guests. we act to restore the lives of homeless neighbors by caring like christ.

Human Services
3
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
4
Union Gospel Mission Association of Olympia

The ougm exists as an evangelical christian rescue mission, serving thurston county, to share the good news of life in jesus christ by meeting the physical, mental and spiritual needs of individuals in crisis.

Human Services
5
Union Gospel Mission Association of St Paul Inc

We provide christ-centered, life-changing pathways for all people who are experiencing homelessness, hunger and addiction.

Human Services
6
Springfield Rescue Mission

The goal of the springfield rescue mission since 1892 has been to meet the physical and spiritual needs of the hungry, homeless, addicted, and poor by introducing them to christ and helping them apply the word of god to every area of their…

Human Services
7
Martinsburg Union Rescue Mission Inc

To provide housing, food and religious counseling for the needy and underprivileged.

Housing & Shelter
8
New Covenant Safe Haven

New Covenant Safe Haven is a Christian-based organization committed to uplifting and supporting individuals and families living in poverty within our community. Our primary mission is to provide essential services such as temporary shelter…

Human Services
9
City Mission Society Inc

See schedule o description of our mission and vision.

Human Services
10
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

11
Valley Mission Inc

Valley Mission currently operates a Food Pantry. New services offered in the new facility will inlcude an 18-bed emergency shelter, commercial kitchen/dining area, office space, medical clinic, 16-bed transformational living program (6…

Human Services
12
Faith House Ministries

Community outreach

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Central West Virginia and the most unlike its peers is Clarksburg Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $612,500 · Human ServicesUNION MISSION MINISTRIES INCUNION RESCUE MISSION INC — $112,500 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSION INCYMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC — $60,500 · Human ServicesYMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INCDAYMARK INC — $60,500 · Human ServicesDAYMARK INCCLARKSBURG MISSION INC — $362,500 · OtherCLARKSBURG MISSION INCHUNTINGTON CITY MISSION — $362,500 · OtherHUNTINGTON CITY MISSIONCOVENANT HOUSE INC — $45,375 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE INCROARK SULLIVAN LIFEWAY CENTER — $45,375 · OtherROARK SULLIVAN LIFEWAY CENTER+2 more — $22,995 · Other
Human Services$846,000Other$838,745

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $612,500 over 1y, 17% of budgetCLARKSBURG MISSION INC — $362,500 over 1y, 38% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION INC — $112,500 over 1y, 15% of budgetYMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC — $60,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetDAYMARK INC — $60,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE INC — $45,375 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetROARK SULLIVAN LIFEWAY CENTER — $45,375 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetRELIGIOUS COALITION FOR COMMUNITY RENEWAL INC — $7,870 over 3y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Encova Foundation of West VirginiaWV22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Encova Foundation of West Virginia · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Tgkvf Inc · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Herscher Foundation Inc · Charles & Mary Fayne Glotfelty Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kanawha Valley Collective Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $229k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph