Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kaiser-Harris Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$156kArts & Culture$24kEducation$22kHealth$17kRecreation & Sports$13kYouth Development$5kPhilanthropy$3kCrime & Legal$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$494k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chrysalis$18,500
Music Center-The Blue Ribbon$3,000
Planned Parenthood of LA$2,500
Library Foundation of Los Angeles$1,500
USC$1,000
KIPP SoCal Schools$1,000
Brentwood Annual Fund$500
UCLA$500
Northwestern University$500
California Community Foundation$500
Bel Air Bay Club$250
Mandeville Foundation$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Chrysalis: $23k → 14%Northwestern University: $5k → 14%Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: $1k → 8%Chrysalis: $22k → 14%Northwestern University: $1k → 14%Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: $500 → 8%Chrysalis: $20k → 14%Northwestern University: $500 → 14%Chrysalis: $19k → 14%Northwestern University: $500 → 14%Chrysalis: $19k → 14%Chrysalis: $19k → 14%Chrysalis: $19k → 14%Chrysalis: $17k → 14%Music Center-The Blue Ribbon: $3k → 14%Music Center-The Blue Ribbon: $3k → 14%Music Center-The Blue Ribbon: $3k → 14%Music Center-The Blue Ribbon: $3k → 14%Music Center-The Blue Ribbon: $3k → 14%Music Center-The Blue Ribbon: $3k → 14%Music Center-The Blue Ribbon: $3k → 14%Music Center-The Blue Ribbon: $3k → 14%California Community Foundation: $1k → 14%Brentwood School: $1k → 14%USC Gould School of Law: $5k → 14%USC Gould School of Law: $3k → 14%USC Gould School of Law: $1k → 14%USC: $1k → 14%USC: $1k → 14%USC Gould School of Law: $1k → 14%UCLA: $5k → 14%UCLA: $1k → 14%UCLA: $1k → 14%Our Community Los Angeles: $1k → 14%Ready to Succeed: $1k → 14%Planned Parenthood of LA: $3k → 14%Planned Parenthood of LA: $3k → 14%Planned Parenthood of LA: $3k → 14%Planned Parenthood of LA: $3k → 14%Planned Parenthood of LA: $2k → 14%KIPP SoCal Schools: $1k → 14%Planned Parenthood of LA: $1k → 14%Library Foundation of Los Angeles: $2k → 14%Library Foundation of Los Angeles: $1k → 14%Library Foundation of Los Angeles: $1k → 14%Big Brothers Big Sisters LA: $3k → 14%Holocaust Museum LA: $3k → 14%Big Brothers Big Sisters LA: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$235k · 13 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$235k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+34%

Still filing today

38%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    5× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +33%
  • TL
    THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +16%
  • BS
    BRENTWOOD SCHOOL
    4× · 2018–2021 · $2k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +33%
  • OC
    Our Community Los Angeles
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • READY TO SUCCEED
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
5
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
6
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
7
Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc

The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.

Arts & Culture
8
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
9
University of Redlands

We welcome, educate, and empower a diverse community of learners for lives of meaning, impact, and joy.

Education
10
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
11
Communities in Schools of Los Angeles Inc

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. we work with public school systems, establishing relationship with superintendents, principals, educators, and community partners to…

Youth Development
12
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Mandeville Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRYSALIS: $156,400 · OtherCHRYSALISMusic Center-The Blue Ribbon: $20,745 · OtherMusic Center-The Blue RibbonPlanned Parenthood of LA: $14,425 · OtherPlanned Parenthood of LAUSC Gould School of Law: $9,500 · OtherUCLA: $8,300 · Other+16 more: $12,230 · Other+16 moreTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $6,560 · EducationBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $2,050 · EducationREADY TO SUCCEED: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationNorthwestern University: $7,250 · Recreation & SportsHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $2,500 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $350 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,500 · HealthJQ INTERNATIONAL: $500 · Religion
Other$221,600Education$9,710Recreation & Sports$7,250Arts & Culture$2,850Philanthropy$2,500Health$1,500Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthwestern University: $7,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $6,560 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $2,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADY TO SUCCEED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBarak Ballet Corporation: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANDEVILLE FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRENTWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds READY TO SUCCEED ↗
  • Who funds JQ INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds Barak Ballet Corporation ↗
  • Who funds MANDEVILLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds KIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kaiser-Harris Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kaiser-Harris Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kaiser-Harris Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph