Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kaab Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$793k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$351k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$2.3MInternational$539kHuman Services$487kEnvironment$102kRecreation & Sports$95kPublic Safety & Disaster$53kFood & Nutrition$50kAnimals$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $256k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $177k
  • $250k+1 grant · $351k
$24,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC$350,667
CHARITY AID FOUNDATION$177,000
YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATION INITIATIVE$28,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTH CAROLINA$25,000
WHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATION INC$25,000
THISTLE FARMS$25,000
DNA DOE PROJECT$25,000
RAINFOREST TRUST$24,000
POLARIS PROJECT$24,000
THE HEADSTRONG PROJECT INC$20,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$20,000
LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION$17,500
MAKE A WISH SOUTH CAROLINA$12,880
CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN$10,000
ALS UNITED CONNECTICUT$9,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $225k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%DNA DOE PROJECT: $25k → 9%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%DNA DOE PROJECT: $20k → 9%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $18k → 6%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 14%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Kaab Memorial Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Kaab Memorial Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 14 repeat orgs$955k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$2.3M
$625k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+25%

Still filing today

93%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $330k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $651k · revenue +13%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $325k · revenue +78%
  • The Fistula Foundation
    2× · 2021–2023 · $80k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • TV
    THE V FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +91%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +42%
  • DT
    DAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +57%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
8
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
11
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
12
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Julie Valentine Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Food Pantries & AssistancePregnancy Support ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Veteran Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChristian Missionary Organi…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Affordable Housing Developm…Community Health CentersChild and Family ServicesCancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%44%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,533

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
29/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $701,334 · OtherALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASS…CHARITY AID FOUNDATION — $177,000 · OtherCHARITY AID FOUNDATIONDAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION — $75,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTH CAROLINA — $75,000 · OtherTHISTLE FARMS INC — $75,000 · OtherALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION — $73,000 · Other+12 more — $324,000 · Other+12 moreALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $650,667 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $325,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCTHE V FOUNDATION — $100,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATIONBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $100,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DThe Fistula Foundation — $80,000 · HealthThe Fistula Foundation+5 more — $81,880 · Health+5 moreMYRIAD USA INC — $514,500 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INCPOLARIS PROJECT — $24,000 · InternationalRAINFOREST TRUST — $24,000 · InternationalMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $67,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $52,500 · Human ServicesDNA DOE PROJECT — $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesYELLOWSTONE TO YUKON — $28,000 · EnvironmentWHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATIONINC — $25,000 · EnvironmentHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK — $50,000 · Food & NutritionCOALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING — $30,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,500,334Health$1,337,547International$562,500Human Services$225,000Environment$53,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Crime & Legal$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $650,667 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $514,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $325,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation — $80,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTH CAROLINA — $75,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION — $73,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $67,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $52,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDNA DOE PROJECT — $45,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetJULIE VALENTINE CENTER — $45,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING — $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGAMERS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC — $29,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYELLOWSTONE TO YUKON — $28,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATIONINC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT — $24,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST — $24,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEAD STRONG PROJECT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SC INC — $12,880 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALS UNITED CONNECTICUT — $9,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Synchrony FoundationCT14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Synchrony Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kaab Memorial Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Whale and Dolphin Conservationinc3% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kaab Memorial Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Kaab Memorial Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph