Skip to content

· Private foundation

K-Ed Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$1.5M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

61% of K-Ed Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Convoy Of Hope, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’22
4
’23
11
’24
5
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$7.1MHuman Services$1.2MArts & Culture$1.1MReligion$1.1MCommunity Improvement$78kPhilanthropy$33kEducation$30kYouth Development$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $305k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.0M
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONVOY OF HOPE$1,500,000
ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE OF NM$275,000
K-LOVE RADIO NETWORK$275,000
REDEEMED FOUNDATION$155,200
VINE MINISTRIES$150,000
HARVEST MINISTRIES$25,000
CORNERSTONE BAPTIST CHURCH$20,000
GATEWAY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$15,000
IMMANUAL LUTHERAN SCHOOL$15,000
JOYTIME MINISTRIES INC$10,000
NM BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $427k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DISCOVERING POWER & PURPOSE INC: $422k → 5%HEALING AMERICA'S HEROES: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
CA
NE
MO
NM
TN
NC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 8 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$2.6M
$946k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-17%
+2%

Still filing today

38%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KR
    K-LOVE RADIO NETWORK
    2× · 2024–2025 · $795k
  • AT
    ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE OF NM
    2× · 2024–2025 · $625k
  • RF
    REDEEMED FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $575k · revenue -39% · 72% of their budget

Funded once

  • DP
    DISCOVERING POWER AND PURPOSE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $422k
  • EM
    EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue +8%
  • WC
    WAYMAKER CHURCH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Resolved Ministries Foundation
Recreation & Sports
2
Repairing the Breach Ministries Inc
Religion
3
Recovery Ministries Inc
Religion
4
Divine Revelation Ministry
Religion
5
Rooted and Grounded Ministries Inc
Religion
6
Praise Broadcasting Inc

Praise broadcasting's (praisefm) vision is to see every tribe and nation experiencing jesus together. our mission is simple: together we help people discover and worship jesus. more than a radio station, praisefm is a place where…

Religion
7
Transform Ministries
—
8
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
9
Power Ministries International Inc
—
10
Victory Television Network Inc

The victory television network (vtn) is a network of full-powered, commerical tv stations in arkansas, including kvtn-dt in little rock/pinebluff, kvth-dt in hot springs and kvtj-dt in jonesboro. founded by pastors h. l. and jeanne…

Religion
11
Plain Truth Ministries Worldwide

Ptm worldwide publishes christianity without the religion magazine and plain truth magazine. ptm further serves with daily radio programs, blogs, bible surveys and many other free inspirational resources on its website, www.ptm.org

Religion
12
Elevateher International Ministries

mission is to empower women to heal from trauma, grow in faith, and thrive in purpose, fully realizing their full potential

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Educational Media Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Arm Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONVOY OF HOPE: $7,100,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPEK-LOVE RADIO NETWORK: $795,000 · OtherK-LOVE RADIO NETWORKADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE OF NM: $625,000 · OtherADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE…Vine Ministries Inc: $322,750 · OtherVine Ministries IncWAYMAKER CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $93,000 · OtherCRU: $78,300 · Other+10 more: $140,000 · Other+10 moreREDEEMED FOUNDATION: $575,200 · ReligionHARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL: $50,000 · Religion+1 more: $10,000 · ReligionDISCOVERING POWER AND PURPOSE INC: $422,194 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesEDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $300,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE: $21,562 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · Health
International$7,100,000Other$2,154,050Religion$635,200Human Services$427,194Arts & Culture$300,000Youth Development$21,562Food & Nutrition$20,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREDEEMED FOUNDATION: $575,200 over 3y, 72% of budgetVine Ministries Inc: $322,750 over 2y, 96% of budgetEDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL: $50,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetROSWELL COMMUNITY LITTLE THEATER INC: $25,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE: $21,562 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WARREN CENTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARM FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 61% of budgetHEALING AMERICAS HEROES: $5,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds REDEEMED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERING POWER AND PURPOSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Vine Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL ↗
  • Who funds ROSWELL COMMUNITY LITTLE THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Joytime Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WARREN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ARM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALING AMERICAS HEROES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization K-Ed Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from K-Ed Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on K-Ed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph