Skip to content
Jupiter Medical Center Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Jupiter Medical Center Inc

The mission of jupiter medical center is to deliver excellent and compassionate healthcare advancing the well-being of the people we serve, regardless of their ability to pay.

$14M
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$13M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Health$21MArts & Culture$35kCommunity Improvement$35kScience & Tech$23kHuman Services$21kPublic Benefit$10k
02FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $262k
  • $250k+2 grants · $14M
$266,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$772M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER PHYSICIANS GROUP INC$13,265,945
Children's HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC$266,000
JMC MSNY VENTURES INC$201,888
American Heart Association$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EL Sol Jupiter's Neighborhood Resource Center Inc: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 6 repeat orgs$818k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$21M
$818k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+6%

Still filing today

67%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyPublic BenefitScience & TechEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20M · revenue +107% · 54% of their budget
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $115k · revenue +33%
  • LP
    LEADERSHIP PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $35k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Pavilion Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $719k · revenue 0% · 33% of their budget
  • TA
    THE ARMORY ART CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +6%
  • LM
    LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2019 · $23k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc

The mission of the jupiter medical center foundation, inc. is to secure the financial resources required to sustain clinical excellence and quality of care at jupiter medical center, inc. & its affiliates.

Philanthropy
2
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
3
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

—
4
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
5
Jupiter Medical Center Inc

The mission of jupiter medical center is to deliver excellent and compassionate healthcare advancing the well-being of the people we serve, regardless of their ability to pay. certain services are provided at a loss or at no payment…

Health
6
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
7
Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc

Jmcpg is committed to providing compassionate, personalized care via a multispecialty team of high-caliber physicians and advanced practice clinicians. across the palm beaches and the treasure coast of florida, jmcpg practice locations…

Health
8
Jacksonville Medical Center Inc
—
9
University of Miami
—
10
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
11
The Jacksonville Historical Society Inc

The mission of the Jacksonville Historical Society is to strengthen citizenship through public history education.

—
12
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miami Children's Health System Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jmc Msny Ventures Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc: $19,687,279 · HealthJupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc+2 more: $512,896 · HealthJupiter Medical Center Pavilion Inc: $719,243 · Other+4 more: $50,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC: $522,860 · PhilanthropyLEADERSHIP PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $35,000 · Public BenefitTHE ARMORY ART CENTER INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $23,000 · Science & TechTIKVA CORP: $15,000 · EducationEl Sol Jupiters Neighborhood Resource Center Inc: $5,500 · Human Services
Health$20,200,175Other$769,243Philanthropy$522,860Public Benefit$35,000Arts & Culture$25,000Science & Tech$23,000Education$15,000Human Services$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc: $19,687,279 over 2y, 54% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Pavilion Inc: $719,243 over 1y, 33% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC: $522,860 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetJMC MSNY Ventures Inc: $397,896 over 2y, 100% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $115,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $35,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetTHE ARMORY ART CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $23,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOXAHATCHEE RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEl Sol Jupiters Neighborhood Resource Center Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties IncFL13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jupiter Medical Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jupiter Medical Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Loxahatchee River Historical Society Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Armory Art Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jupiter Medical Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home