Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Jupiter Medical Center Inc

The mission of jupiter medical center is to deliver excellent and compassionate healthcare advancing the well-being of the people we serve, regardless of their ability to pay.

$14M
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$13M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192022.

Health$21MArts & Culture$35kCommunity Improvement$35kScience & Tech$23kHuman Services$21kPublic Benefit$10k
02FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $262k
  • $250k+2 grants · $14M
$266,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$772M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER PHYSICIANS GROUP INC$13,265,945
Children's HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC$266,000
JMC MSNY VENTURES INC$201,888
American Heart Association$60,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EL Sol Jupiter's Neighborhood Resource Center Inc: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$21M · 6 repeat orgs$818k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$21M
$818k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+6%

Still filing today

67%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyPublic BenefitScience & TechEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20M · revenue +107% · 54% of their budget
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $115k · revenue +33%
  • LP
    LEADERSHIP PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $35k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Pavilion Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $719k · revenue 0% · 33% of their budget
  • TA
    THE ARMORY ART CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +6%
  • LM
    LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2019 · $23k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc

The mission of the jupiter medical center foundation, inc. is to secure the financial resources required to sustain clinical excellence and quality of care at jupiter medical center, inc. & its affiliates.

Philanthropy
2
Jupiter Medical Center Inc

The mission of jupiter medical center is to deliver excellent and compassionate healthcare advancing the well-being of the people we serve, regardless of their ability to pay. certain services are provided at a loss or at no payment…

Health
3
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

4
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
5
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
6
Jacksonville Medical Center Inc
7
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
8
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
9
Shands Jacksonville Healthcare Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
10
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
11
Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute Inc

The NCHRI directly supports the NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ("NCH") mission to provide hope through advanced care for our children and families. (CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O)

12
Jersey City Medical Center

The organization's mission is to offer healthcare services with compassion and dignity. the organization provides patients, their families and all in need, excellence in hospital and healthcare services and programs to enhance community…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jmc Msny Ventures Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc — $19,687,279 · HealthJupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc+2 more — $512,896 · HealthJupiter Medical Center Pavilion Inc — $719,243 · Other+4 more — $50,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC — $522,860 · PhilanthropyLEADERSHIP PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $35,000 · Public BenefitTHE ARMORY ART CENTER INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC — $23,000 · Science & TechTIKVA CORP — $15,000 · EducationEl Sol Jupiters Neighborhood Resource Center Inc — $5,500 · Human Services
Health$20,200,175Other$769,243Philanthropy$522,860Public Benefit$35,000Arts & Culture$25,000Science & Tech$23,000Education$15,000Human Services$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc — $19,687,279 over 2y, 54% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Pavilion Inc — $719,243 over 1y, 33% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC — $522,860 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetJMC MSNY Ventures Inc — $397,896 over 2y, 100% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $115,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $35,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetTHE ARMORY ART CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC — $23,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTIKVA CORP — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOXAHATCHEE RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEl Sol Jupiters Neighborhood Resource Center Inc — $5,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties IncFL13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jupiter Medical Center Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Loxahatchee River Historical Society Inc6% of income from government
  • The Armory Art Center Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph