Skip to content
Junior League of Roanoke Valley Virginia Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Junior League of Roanoke Valley Virginia Inc

The junior league of roanoke valley is an organization of women committed to promoting voluntarism, developing the potential of women and improving communities through the effective action of trained volunteers.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$70kHealth$31kHousing & Shelter$24kFood & Nutrition$17kPhilanthropy$15kRecreation & Sports$10kEducation$9kHuman Services$8k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $35,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $72,762 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,762 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLUE RIDGE LITERACY$15,000
THE HOPE CENTER$10,000
PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ROANOKE VALLEY COMMUNITY: $8k → 8%YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM: $31k → 8%UNITED METHODIST COMMUNITY OUTREACH PROGRAM (KIDS SOAR): $9k → 20%PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City of Refuge - South Hill Inc

Our program is designed to help give back to the Southern Virginia community. We have weekly programs in place geared towards youth, young adults, families and senior citizens. We reach these individuals through feeding and group meetings…

Human Services
2
Rwa Center

Community services

Human Services
3
Restoring Hope Center Inc

Restoring Hope Center, Inc. is a benovolence organization operating in Laurinburg, NC. The organization has benevolence programs providing food and supplies to the local area, supplies other smaller like-kind organizations, conducts a…

Human Services
4
Blue Ridge Area Food Bank Inc

The food bank purchases food and obtains donations of food from the united states department of agriculture, manufacturers, distributors, retailers, growers and community members for distribution to people in need in 25 counties and eight…

—
5
Urban Baby Beginnings dba Ubb

To provide community support, workforce development, and advocacy for birthing and postpartum families.

Human Services
6
Renew Richmond

Renew Richmond strives to build healthier, more self-empowered communities by involving local youth in agriculture and environmental sustainability. We do this by partnering with local public schools.

Environment
7
Roxbury Youth Soccer League

Recreational soccer program

Youth Development
8
Northside Outreach Center Inc

The mission is to share the love of jesus in the highland park community by uniting believers to bring community support and meet practical physical needs that provide holistic enduring change.

Religion
9
Ugk Community First Corp

UGK Community First provides a consistent source of nutritious and healthy chef prepared meals to food insecure families who live in underserved communities as well as those who find themselves in food insecure situations due to…

Food & Nutrition
10
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
11
The Capital Area Reach Program

Job Training for Teens

Youth Development
12
Doddridge County Starting Point Center Inc

We provide programs and services that support and strengthen Doddridge County families through interagency coordination and collaboration. These will be available, easily accessible, and located with in the county.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Virginia's Blue Ridge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Roanoke Valley Youth Soccer Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
3/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $30,857 · Human ServicesYOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INCPRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTERKIDS SOAR: $9,000 · Human ServicesKIDS SOARCOMMUNITY CHRISTMAS STORE: $8,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CHRISTMAS STOREUNITED WAY OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC: $31,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF VIRGI…EASTER SEALS INC: $16,000 · OtherEASTER SEALS I…Roanoke Area Ministries: $8,000 · OtherRoanoke Area M…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INC: $19,600 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGRICULTURE PROJECT LEAP: $17,000 · Food & NutritionLOCAL ENVI…BLUE RIDGE LITERACY: $15,000 · EducationBLUE RIDG…Roanoke Valley Youth Soccer Club Inc: $10,178 · Recreation & SportsHOPE CENTER 11TH ST NW: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Human Services$57,857Philanthropy$31,000Other$24,000Youth Development$19,600Food & Nutrition$17,000Education$15,000Recreation & Sports$10,178Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC: $31,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $30,857 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGRICULTURE PROJECT LEAP: $17,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE LITERACY: $15,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetHOPE CENTER 11TH ST NW: $10,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRoanoke Area Ministries: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY CHRISTMAS STORE: $8,000 over 1y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Edgar a Thurman Fdn C…United Way of Virgini…Robertson Family Foun…Carilion Medical Cent…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation Serving Western VirginiaVA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · Edgar a Thurman Fdn Children Nect · United Way of Virginia's Blue Ridge Inc · Robertson Family Foundation Inc · Carilion Medical Center · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Junior League of Roanoke Valley Virginia Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Junior League of Roanoke Valley Virginia Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Junior League of Roanoke Valley Virginia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home