Skip to content
Junior League of Greenville Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Junior League of Greenville Inc

The junior league of greenville, inc.

$100k
Granted FY2026still arriving
6
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$165kArts & Culture$100kHuman Services$69kReligion$48kEducation$29kYouth Development$25kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2026 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $96,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $100,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$16,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED MINISTRIES$25,000
FEED & SEED CO$20,000
MEYERS CENTER$16,000
THE FAMILY EFFECT$15,000
FINE ARTS CENTER PARTNERS$10,000
SAFE HARBOR$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PENDLETON PLACE: $150k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville Theatre Arts Center
—
2
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
3
South Carolina Victim Assistance Network

The south carolina victim assistance network's mission is to ensure crime victims receive access to, and assistance from the criminal and juvenile justice systems and related social service providers; to improve the quality of services…

—
4
South Carolina Empowerment Centre

SCEC launched to address the increasing challenges facing youth along with their families in generational poverty by providing support mentorship and services that encourage youth to realize their full potential.

Community Improvement
5
Judson Community Partnership

Judson community partnership exists to provide opportunities for academic growth, exposure to the arts, and therapeutic healing to youth and families in the judson neighborhood of greenville, sc through afterschool programming and…

Human Services
6
Standup-Speakout of North Carolina

To empower individuals we serve by providing advocacy and therapeutic support through art therapy for children and teens who are victims or witnesses to domestic violence and sexual abuse.

Human Services
7
The Turning Point of South Carolina Inc

Our Mission is to provide a structured, safe and secure residential setting in which people may recover from substance addiction physically, mentally and spiritually and reconnect with their families and community.

Housing & Shelter
8
The Greenville Community Shelters

To serve the homeless and those at risk of homelessness by providing safe housing and assisting them in developing a long-term plan that leads to self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
9
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
10
Beyond Abuse

To lead the community beyond sexual violence and child abuse through awareness, advocacy, and action.

—
11
Jasmine Road Inc

Jasmine road's mission is to offer adult women trapped in a cycle of sexual exploitation and addiction a path to freedom, a haven for healing, and the opportunity to flourish, leading to generational change and the betterment of the…

Crime & Legal
12
Family Services Inc

Origin sc empowers individuals to achieve financial, housing and mental health stability through advocacy, counseling, and education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Harbor Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Family Effect. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENDLETON PLACE INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesPENDLETON PLACE INCAPPLIED THEATRE CENTER INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesAPPLIED THEATRE CENTER INCSWITCH: $10,950 · Human ServicesSWITCHSAFE HARBOR INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNICHOLTOWN CHILD AND FAMILY COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $100,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDRE…FINE ARTS CENTER PARTNERS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFINE ARTS CENTER PARTN…MEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $16,000 · OtherMEYER CENTER FOR SPECI…ROPER MOUNTAIN SCIENCE CENTER: $15,699 · OtherROPER MOUNTAIN SCIENCE…PROJECT HOST INC: $15,000 · OtherPROJECT HOST INCJULIE VALENTINE CENTER: $14,500 · OtherJULIE VALENTINE CENTERGREENVILLE COUNTY DISABILITIES AND SPECIAL NEEDS BOARD: $12,500 · OtherGREENVILLE COUNTY DISA…DIAPER BANK OF THE CAROLINAS: $10,000 · OtherDIAPER BANK OF THE CAR…SOTERIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15,000 · OtherSOTERIA COMMUNITY DEVE…TRIUNE MERCY CENTER: $10,000 · OtherTRIUNE MERCY CENTERUNITED MINISTRIES: $63,000 · ReligionUNITED MINIST…FEED & SEED CO: $20,000 · EducationGREENVILLE LITERACY ASSOCIATION: $13,500 · EducationYOUTHBASE INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirlUp GVL: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FAMILY EFFECT: $15,000 · Social Science
Human Services$191,950Arts & Culture$110,000Other$108,699Religion$63,000Education$33,500Youth Development$25,000Social Science$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPENDLETON PLACE INC: $150,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $100,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED MINISTRIES: $63,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetYOUTHBASE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSOTERIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGREENVILLE LITERACY ASSOCIATION: $13,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAPPLIED THEATRE CENTER INC: $11,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTRIUNE MERCY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDIAPER BANK OF THE CAROLINAS: $10,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetGirlUp GVL: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetNICHOLTOWN CHILD AND FAMILY COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jolley FoundationUnited Way of Greenvi…Scansource Charitable…Sisk Foundation Bunco…Scsymmes FoundationSpinks Family Foundat…Charity Ball Board of…Kellett Family Founda…Hollingsworth Funds I…United Community Bank…W W Burgiss Charities…Elbert W Rogers Found…
The Jolley FoundationNV30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jolley Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Sisk Foundation Buncombe St Methodist Church · Scsymmes Foundation · Spinks Family Foundation · Charity Ball Board of Greenville · Kellett Family Foundation · Hollingsworth Funds Inc · United Community Bank Foundation · W W Burgiss Charities Inc · Elbert W Rogers Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Junior League of Greenville Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Junior League of Greenville Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Junior League of Greenville’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home