Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jung Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$134kHealth$54kInternational$28kCrime & Legal$21kHuman Services$20kReligion$12kFood & Nutrition$1kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$6,265
Median grant
5
States reached
$547k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAYLAND ACADEMY$22,530
Individual grant recipient$8,765
HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT$7,515
SINGLE MOM MINISTRIES$6,265
CHURCH HEALTH SERVICES$5,000
WASHINGTON EDUCATION & SQUASH ACADEMY$3,765
CAMFED USA$3,750
GREEN VALLEY ENTERPRISES$2,530
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YOUTHCARE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
CA
VA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$246k · 9 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$246k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+33%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthEducationReligionCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WAYLAND ACADEMY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $116k · revenue +38%
  • CH
    CHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +65%
  • TH
    THE HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTITUTE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $21k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • BD
    BEAVER DAM COMMUNITY HOSPITALS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue +98%
  • A
    ALIGHTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +33%
  • Y
    YOUTHCARE
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
3
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
4
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
5
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
6
Intealth

See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…

Education
7
Institute for Student Achievement Foundation

Institute for student achievement foundation (isaf) raises funds to support the institute for student achievement (isa), which is a part of educational testing service, a section 501(c)(3) public charity, that wants all students,…

Education
8
International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology Inc

The organization provides peer reviewed scientific research and education in the field of biological dentistry.

Health
9
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
10
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
11
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
12
Aim High for High School

To increase educational equity by providing joyful, enriching learning experiences for middle school students, aspiring teachers, and experienced educators.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camfed Usa Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Washington Education & Squash Academy Formerly Seattle Urban Squash. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAYLAND ACADEMY: $116,199 · EducationWAYLAND ACADEMYSINGLE MOM MINISTRIES: $17,965 · OtherSINGLE MOM MINISTRIE…SOJOURN CHURCH: $11,700 · OtherSOJOURN CHURCHWASHINGTON EDUCATION & SQUASH ACADEMY FORMERLY SEATTLE URBAN SQUASH: $8,765 · OtherWASHINGTON EDUCATION…Individual grant recipient: $8,765 · OtherIndividual grant rec…GREEN VALLEY ENTERPRISES INC OF BEAVER DAM: $2,530 · Other+1 more: $1,200 · OtherCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC: $35,734 · ReligionCHURCH HEALTH …HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $16,316 · InternationalHIMALAYAN C…CAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $9,550 · InternationalCAMFED USA …ALIGHT: $2,200 · InternationalALIGHTTHE HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTITUTE: $21,068 · Crime & LegalBEAVER DAM COMMUNITY HOSPITALS FOUNDATION INC: $17,600 · HealthELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthONEGOAL: $8,800 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTHCARE: $1,200 · Human Services
Education$116,199Other$50,925Religion$35,734International$28,066Crime & Legal$21,068Health$18,600Youth Development$8,800Human Services$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAYLAND ACADEMY: $116,199 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC: $35,734 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetTHE HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTITUTE: $21,068 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBEAVER DAM COMMUNITY HOSPITALS FOUNDATION INC: $17,600 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $16,316 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $9,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONEGOAL: $8,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON EDUCATION & SQUASH ACADEMY FORMERLY SEATTLE URBAN SQUASH: $8,765 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetALIGHT: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHCARE: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jung Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jung Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jung Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jung Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jung Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph