Skip to content
June Onefive Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

June Onefive Foundation Inc

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2019
5
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Health$172kEducation$145kCivil Rights$110kCommunity Improvement$100kArts & Culture$71kPublic Benefit$27kPhilanthropy$14kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2019 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA CRESCENT AREA EVENT CENTER INC$67,000
LA CROSSE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$35,000
WISCONSINEYE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK INC$25,000
GROW LA CROSSE INC$2,070
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF LA CROSSE INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%EAST SIDE ALANO CLUB OF MADISON INC: $500 → 10%RAY HOWELL'S KICKING BEAR FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$292k · 7 repeat orgs$371k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
20

Total granted

$292k
$346k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+18%

Still filing today

57%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LA CROSSE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
    3× · 2017–2019 · $120k
  • LC
    LA CRESCENT AREA EVENT CENTER INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $100k · revenue -79%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF LA CROSSE INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $51k · revenue -60%

Funded once

  • UF
    UWL FOUNDATION - FREEDOM FEST
    one grant, 2017 · $110k
  • GL
    Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +48%
  • CC
    COULEE COUNCIL ON ADDICTIONS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater La Crosse Area Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc
Education
2
La Crosse Youth Symphony Society Inc

To foster, promote and increase the musical knowledge and appreciation of the public, exclusively by educational activities, by organizing and presenting performances of music by youth in the city of la crosse, wisconsin and surrounding…

—
3
La Crosse Jail Ministry Inc

To provide religious services, bible study and counseling to la crosse county jail inmates.

—
4
La Crosse Logan Alumni Association
Education
5
Drift Share Inc

Mission - to support initiatives and programs of easy-to-use rentals for residents, commuters, and visitors offering affordable, sustainable options contributing to the health and vibrancy of the la crosse, wi community.

Community Improvement
6
Waukee Lacrosse
Recreation & Sports
7
Waukesha Lacrosse Club Inc

The organization's mission is to develop a positive environment where athletes are able to learn and develop skills needed to play competitive lacrosse.

Recreation & Sports
8
University of Wisconsin La Crosse - Alumni Association

To support university of wisconsin la crosse by building and maintaining relationships among students, alumni, friends and the university.

—
9
Greater La Crosse Area Chamber of Commerce

To be a progressive business resource, growing companies and developing leaders through collaboration, advocacy, information, and services that benefit current and future businesses.

—
10
La Crosse City Vision Foundation Inc
—
11
Ladd Memorial Hospital Inc

To inspire and improve the health and well-being of our community through home-town customer service, quality healthcare and strategic partnerships.

Health
12
La Crosse County Historical Society

La crosse county historical society discovers, collects, preserves and shares the history of la crosse county wisconsin

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family and Children's Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is East Side Alano Club of Madison Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA CROSSE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $120,000 · OtherLA CROSSE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTUWL FOUNDATION - FREEDOM FEST: $110,000 · OtherUWL FOUNDATION - FREEDOM FESTAQUINAS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS INC: $15,000 · OtherAQUINAS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS INC+10 more: $20,620 · Other+10 moreGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc: $100,000 · HealthGundersen Lutheran Medical Fo…COULEE COUNCIL ON ADDICTIONS INC: $50,000 · HealthCOULEE COUNCIL ON ADDICTIONS …HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATIO…LA CRESCENT AREA EVENT CENTER INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementLA CRESCENT AREA …CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF LA CROSSE INC: $51,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSE…WISCONSINEYE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureWISCONSINEYE PU…LA CROSSE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureLA CROSSE PERFO…GREAT RIVERS UNITED WAY INC: $13,500 · PhilanthropyLA CROSSE SKYROCKERS INC: $5,000 · EducationLOGAN BOOSTER CLUB: $5,000 · EducationKICKING BEAR FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of the Diocese: $2,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesEAST SIDE ALANO CLUB OF MADISON INC: $500 · Human ServicesGROW LA CROSSE INC: $3,770 · Youth Development
Other$265,620Health$170,000Community Improvement$100,000Arts & Culture$91,000Philanthropy$13,500Education$10,000Human Services$9,000Youth Development$3,770

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLA CRESCENT AREA EVENT CENTER INC: $100,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF LA CROSSE INC: $51,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCOULEE COUNCIL ON ADDICTIONS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetWISCONSINEYE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA CROSSE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetGREAT RIVERS UNITED WAY INC: $13,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKICKING BEAR FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLOGAN BOOSTER CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetGROW LA CROSSE INC: $3,770 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMOBILE MEALS OF LA CROSSE INC: $3,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Diocese: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST SIDE ALANO CLUB OF MADISON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

La Crosse Community F…Mayo Clinic Group Ret…Dahl Family Foundatio…Cleary-Kumm Foundatio…Smith Russell & Vera …Lyche Family Foundati…John & Kathy Reinhart…Sue Anne Gelatt Found…Alm Charities IncHerbert H Kohl Charit…Green Bay Packers Fou…Otto Bremer Trust
La Crosse Community FoundationWI32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: La Crosse Community Foundation · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Dahl Family Foundation Xxxxxx6214 · Cleary-Kumm Foundation Inc · Smith Russell & Vera Private Fdn Xxxxxx4172 · Lyche Family Foundation Inc · John & Kathy Reinhart Family Foundation · Sue Anne Gelatt Foundation · Alm Charities Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization June Onefive Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from June Onefive Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on June Onefive’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home