Skip to content

· Private foundation

June 8th Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$56kHealth$30kEnvironment$25kEducation$14kArts & Culture$12kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$160k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION$3,000
TRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN$2,000
NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGE$2,000
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$2,000
DENNOS MUSEUM$1,500
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
FATHER FRED FOUNDATION$1,000
GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONS$1,000
ACME CHRISTIAN THRIFT STORE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY- GR TRAVERSE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION: $3k → 21%EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION: $3k → 21%Emily Ann Griffin Foundation: $3k → 21%EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION: $3k → 21%EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION: $3k → 21%EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION: $3k → 21%EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION: $3k → 21%Emily Ann Griffin Foundation: $3k → 21%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%Father Fred Foundation: $1k → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%Father Fred Foundation: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$149k · 16 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against -60% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$149k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
-60%

Still filing today

44%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EA
    EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +111%
  • THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +109%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • NM
    Northwestern MI College Scholarship Fund
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • LC
    LEELANAU CONSERVANCY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment
3
The Little Forks Conservancy Inc

To permanently protect and improve natural environments in Mid-Michigan by leading and inspiring actions that conserve vital habitats and waterways for the benefit of our entire community.

Environment
4
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
5
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
6
Six Rivers Land Conservancy Fka Six Rivers Regional Land Conservancy

To conserve, sustain, and connect natural areas, land, and waters that make the places we live special

Environment
7
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
8
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
9
Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital

We, trinity health grand haven hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.trinity health grand haven hospital is a member of trinity…

Health
10
Lake Superior Community Partnership Inc

To stimulate and sustain a vibrant regional economy by facilitating economic growth and prosperity.

—
11
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
12
Michigan Pharmacy Foundation

To advance pharmacy through education, practice innovation and research focused on patient care, for the improvement and promotion of public health and public education.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is Emily Ann Griffin Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGE: $12,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGEDENNOS MUSEUM: $12,000 · OtherDENNOS MUSEUMSALVATION ARMY: $8,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $6,000 · OtherCHILD AND FAMILY SERVICESACME CHRISTIAN THRIFT STORE: $6,000 · OtherACME CHRISTIAN THRIFT STOREGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONS: $6,000 · OtherGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONS+5 more: $9,000 · Other+5 moreEMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION: $24,000 · Human ServicesEMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUND…FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesFATHER FRED FOUNDATIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $16,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF…TRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION: $14,000 · HealthTRAVERSE HEALTH CLINI…THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $16,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR…GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $2,000 · EnvironmentGRAND TRAVERS…LEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $1,000 · Environment
Other$74,000Human Services$32,000Health$30,000Environment$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION: $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds TRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION ↗
  • Who funds FATHER FRED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization June 8th Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from June 8th Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to June 8th Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to June 8th Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on June 8th’s filings →

    More from the funding graph