Skip to content

· Private foundation

Julius & Evelyn Melnick Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$62kPhilanthropy$28kHuman Services$25kHealth$23kArts & Culture$21kHousing & Shelter$12k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$366k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION$2,500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$2,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$1,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL$1,000
WNYC RADIO$1,000
HOUSING WORKS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
JBI INTERNATIONAL INC$500
FUND FOR THE AGED INC$500
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$500
USHMM$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CONTRACTORS FOR KIDS: $1k → 7%CONTRACTORS FOR KIDS: $750 → 7%CONTRACTORS FOR KIDS: $750 → 7%CONTRACTORS FOR KIDS: $750 → 7%CONTRACTORS FOR KIDS: $750 → 7%CONTRACTORS FOR KIDS: $750 → 7%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $3k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $2k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $2k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $2k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $2k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $2k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$127k · 18 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$127k
$1k

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +39%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +98%
  • HW
    HOUSING WORKS INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $6k · revenue +153%

Funded once

  • UV
    UNITED VINCIE CULTURAL GROUP OF BROOKLYN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
4
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
5
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
6
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
7
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
8
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
9
The New York Gracie Square Hospital Inc

Our mission is to provide the highest-quality, state-of-the-art mental health and chemical dependency treatment in a warm, healing environment. our caring, compassionate team prepares our patients to return to their families and…

Health
10
Jewish Home Lifecare Manhattan

Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.

Health
11
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
12
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Access Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $28,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH …AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $13,500 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC+1 more: $1,500 · InternationalUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $28,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-…NEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 · PhilanthropyNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTER…NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $16,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PUB…BRONX CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $2,500 · Arts & CultureBRONX CHILDR…Individual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual g…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $5,750 · OtherHABITAT FOR …THE ICLA DA SILVA FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 · OtherTHE ICLA DA …UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $1,000 · OtherUNITED STATE…UNITED VINCIE CULTURAL GROUP OF BROOKLYN INC: $1,000 · OtherUNITED VINCI…+1 more: $500 · OtherALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,750 · HealthALZHEIMER'S…COMMUNITY ACCESS INC: $5,250 · HealthCOMMUNITY A…JBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,250 · HealthJBI INTERNA…AUTISM SPEAKS INC: $750 · HealthFUND FOR THE AGED INC: $11,500 · Human ServicesFUND FOR T…CONTRACTORS FOR KIDS INC: $4,750 · Human ServicesCONTRACTOR…HOUSING WORKS INC: $6,400 · Community ImprovementBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION: $5,250 · Housing & Shelter
International$56,500Philanthropy$32,000Arts & Culture$18,500Other$18,000Health$17,000Human Services$16,250Community Improvement$6,400Housing & Shelter$5,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $28,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $28,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $13,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE AGED INC: $11,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING WORKS INC: $6,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACCESS INC: $5,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION: $5,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCONTRACTORS FOR KIDS INC: $4,750 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRONX CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ICLA DA SILVA FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $750 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE AGED INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds JBI INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CONTRACTORS FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds BRONX CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE ICLA DA SILVA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Julius & Evelyn Melnick Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Julius & Evelyn Melnick Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Julius & Evelyn Melnick’s filings →

    More from the funding graph