Skip to content

· Private foundation

Julie Morsman Schroeder Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$567kEnvironment$199kHuman Services$181kAnimals$177kPhilanthropy$80k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $186k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEBRASKA LAND TRUST$50,000
MUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART$50,000
LAURITZEN GARDENS$50,000
OPERA OMAHA INC$50,000
OMAHA'S HENRY DOORLY ZOO AND AQUARIUM$46,000
OMAHA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$30,000
SPRING CREEK PRAIRIE AUDUBON$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
JOSLYN ART MUSEUM$20,000
OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC$10,000
DURHAM MUSEUM$10,000
JOSLYN CASTLE TRUST$10,000
HERON HAVEN NATURE CENTER$5,000
AMERICAN MIDWEST BALLET$5,000
KVNO$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ROWE AUDUBON SANCTUARY: $30k → 13%NEBRASKA LAND TRUST: $50k → 13%ROWE AUDUBON SANCTUARY: $15k → 13%SPRING CREEK PRAIRIE AUDUBON: $30k → 13%ROWE AUDUBON SANCTUARY: $15k → 13%NEBRASKA LAND TRUST: $35k → 13%ROWE AUDUBON SANCTUARY: $8k → 13%SPRING CREEK PRAIRIE AUDUBON: $15k → 13%ROWE AUDUBON SANCTUARY: $8k → 13%NEBRASKA LAND TRUST: $25k → 13%SPRING CREEK PRAIRIE AUDUBON: $15k → 13%MUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART: $50k → 13%NEBRASKA LAND TRUST: $25k → 13%MUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART: $25k → 13%SPRING CREEK PRAIRIE AUDUBON: $8k → 13%MUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART: $25k → 13%NEBRASKA LAND TRUST: $25k → 13%MUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART: $25k → 13%SPRING CREEK PRAIRIE AUDUBON: $8k → 13%MUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART: $25k → 13%NEBRASKA LAND TRUST: $25k → 13%MUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART: $20k → 13%OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $10k → 12%OPERA OMAHA INC: $50k → 12%OMAHA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $30k → 12%OPERA OMAHA INC: $25k → 12%OPERA OMAHA INC: $25k → 12%OPERA OMAHA INC: $25k → 12%OPERA OMAHA INC: $25k → 12%OPERA OMAHA INC: $25k → 12%JOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $20k → 12%OMAHA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $15k → 12%OMAHA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $15k → 12%JOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $10k → 12%OMAHA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $8k → 12%LAURITZEN GARDENS: $50k → 12%LAURITZEN GARDENS: $25k → 12%LAURITZEN GARDENS: $25k → 12%LAURITZEN GARDENS: $25k → 12%LAURITZEN GARDENS: $25k → 12%LAURITZEN GARDENS: $25k → 12%DURHAM MUSEUM: $10k → 12%JOSLYN CASTLE TRUST: $10k → 12%OMAHA'S HENRY DOORLY ZOO AND AQUARIUM: $46k → 12%OMAHA'S HENRY DOORLY ZOO AND AQUARIUM: $23k → 12%OMAHA'S HENRY DOORLY ZOO AND AQUARIUM: $20k → 12%OMAHA'S HENRY DOORLY ZOO AND AQUARIUM: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 16 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$1.2M
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-4%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART
    6× · 2020–2025 · $170k · revenue +168%
  • OZ
    OMAHA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $97k · revenue +14%
  • OC
    Omaha Children's Museum
    6× · 2020–2025 · $73k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • TN
    THE NEBRASKA COMMUNITIES PLAYHOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dubuque Museum of Art

To excite, engage & educate constituents through the presentation of collections, exhibitions, and programming; to form mutually beneficial partnerships that will enhance the role of the arts within the community.

Arts & Culture
2
Hastings Museum

The mission of the hastings museum is to bring to life the natural and cultural history of hastings, adams county and the great plains of nebraska through the use of educational programs, exhibits and films.

—
3
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
4
New Orleans Museum of Art

The mission of the new orleans museum of art is to inspire the love of art; to collect, preserve, exhibit and present excellence in the visual arts; to educate, challenge and engage a diverse public.

Arts & Culture
5
Cedar Rapids Museum of Art

To excite, engage and educate through the arts.

Arts & Culture
6
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
7
Omaha Theater Company

To inspire young people and their families to discover the magic of theater, find their voices, and enrich their communities. theater is utilized as a tool in the educational and social development of young people to provide formal…

Arts & Culture
8
Museum of Wisconsin Art Inc

The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…

Arts & Culture
9
Heckscher Museum

Museum has a mission to create opportunties for everyone to experience art that broadens understanding of the past, fosters community connections to the present, and creates diverse possbilities for the future.

Arts & Culture
10
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
11
Museum of Northwest Art

The museum of northwest art collects, preserves, interprets and exhibits art created in the pacific northwest, supports artists, and strives to integrate art into the lives of all people. the museum is free and open to the public seven…

Arts & Culture
12
Midwest Museum of Natural History

Mission statement of the midwest museum: encouraging our community's appreciation of natural history using shared experiences through collections, exhibits, and education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opera Omaha Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ballet Nebraska. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OPERA OMAHA INC: $175,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA OMAHA INCMUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART: $170,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ARTOmaha Children's Museum: $72,500 · Arts & CultureOmaha Children's MuseumJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $31,000 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART MUSEUMOMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $28,500 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC: $27,500 · Arts & CultureTHE DURHAM MUSEUM: $27,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $23,000 · Arts & CultureLAURITZEN GARDENS: $175,000 · OtherLAURITZEN GARDENSSPRING CREEK PRAIRIE AUDUBON: $80,000 · OtherSPRING CREEK PRAIRIE AUDUBONIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHERON HAVEN NATURE CENTER: $14,500 · Other+3 more: $18,000 · OtherTHE NEBRASKA LAND TRUST INC: $184,500 · EnvironmentTHE NEBRASKA LAND…OMAHA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $96,500 · AnimalsOMAHA ZOO…
Arts & Culture$554,500Other$367,500Environment$184,500Animals$96,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NEBRASKA LAND TRUST INC: $184,500 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetOPERA OMAHA INC: $175,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART: $170,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetOMAHA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $96,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOmaha Children's Museum: $72,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $28,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC: $27,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DURHAM MUSEUM: $27,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBALLET NEBRASKA: $13,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NEBRASKA COMMUNITIES PLAYHOUSE: $6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NEBRASKA LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERA OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Omaha Children's Museum ↗
  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds JOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DURHAM MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds BALLET NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds THE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NEBRASKA COMMUNITIES PLAYHOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · The Fred and Eve Simon Charitable Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Iowa West Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Lauritzen Foundation · Allan and Ann Mactier Charitable Foundation · Annette and Paul Smith Charitable Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Julie Morsman Schroeder Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Julie Morsman Schroeder Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Julie Morsman Schroeder Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Julie Morsman Schroeder Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Julie Morsman Schroeder’s filings →

    More from the funding graph