Skip to content

· Private foundation

Julia Zepkowski Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$32k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$16,632
Various Community Outreach$7,585
American Society for Suicide Preven$6,100
Tioga County Boys and Girls Club$4,899
Whirlwind Volleyball Club$4,000
Catholic Charities Tompkins Tioga$2,255
Owego Hose Team$1,340
A New Hope Center$1,280
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Chemung County Suicide Prevention C$1,000
Punishers LE MC PANYC$1,000
Park Terrace Community UMC$954
Tioga Wrestling Club$740
Kalis Klubhouse$700
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%A New Hope Center: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $16,632 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVarious Community Outreach: $7,585 · OtherVarious Community OutreachAmerican Society for Suicide Preven: $6,100 · OtherAmerican Society for Suicide PrevenWhirlwind Volleyball Club: $4,000 · OtherWhirlwind Volleyball ClubCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ROCHESTER: $2,255 · Other+12 more: $6,779 · Other+12 moreTIOGA COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $4,899 · Youth DevelopmentTIOGA COUN…OWEGO HOSE TEAMS: $1,340 · Public Safety & DisasterA NEW HOPE CENTER INC: $1,280 · Human ServicesKALIS KLUBHOUSE: $700 · Public BenefitOwego Little League Inc: $655 · Recreation & Sports
Other$43,351Youth Development$4,899Public Safety & Disaster$1,340Human Services$1,280Public Benefit$700Recreation & Sports$655

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOWEGO HOSE TEAMS: $1,340 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetKALIS KLUBHOUSE: $700 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOwego Little League Inc: $655 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIOGA COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds OWEGO HOSE TEAMS ↗
  • Who funds A NEW HOPE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KALIS KLUBHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Owego Little League Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Tsb Foundation IncNY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Tsb Foundation Inc · Floyd Hooker Foundation · Tioga United Way Inc · Tioga Downs Regional Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Julia Zepkowski Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Julia Zepkowski Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Julia Zepkowski Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph