Skip to content

· Private foundation

Julia J Mingenback Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$175k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$687kEducation$651kHealth$220kHuman Services$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kRecreation & Sports$35kCommunity Improvement$30k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCPHERSON OPERA HOUSE COMPANY$70,000
CENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE$60,000
MCPHERSON VALLEY UPLANDS LRNING CTR$25,000
CENTRAL KANSAS CONSERVANCY INC$10,000
BIRGER SANDZEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE CEDARS: $25k → 10%THE CEDARS: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 11 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$1.5M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+110%

Still filing today

64%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MCPHERSON OPERA HOUSE COMPANY
    5× · 2019–2025 · $345k · revenue +47%
  • MC
    MCPHERSON COLLEGE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +3%
  • BC
    BETHANY COLLEGE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $140k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF MCPHERSON KS
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • MB
    MCPHERSON BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • MC
    MCPHERSON COMMUNITY THEATER
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
McPherson Hospital Inc

Superior healthcare and exceptional service for each person, every time.

Health
2
The Cowley County Historical Society

The museum collects and preserves memorabilia of cowley county, kansas. the museum is open to the public during scheduled hours, and is staffed by a combination of volunteers and staff.

—
3
Foundation of Central Christian College

To support and promote furtherance of the mission of central christian college of kansas, to education men and women of character to impact the world for christ.

Education
4
Morton County Historical Society Inc

Preservation of historical records and artifacts of morton county, kansas

—
5
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
6
Kirkland Museum of Fine & Decorative Art C/O Denver Art Museu
Arts & Culture
7
Manhattan Christian College Inc

To educate, equip, and enrich christian leaders.

Education
8
Kansas City Christian School Association

To bring glory to god by providing children with an excellent christ- centered education rooted in the word of god.

—
9
Jefferson County Memorial Hospital Inc

Promote and provide quality healthcare for the general commuinty of Jefferson County

Health
10
McPherson County Community Foundation

The McPherson County Community Foundation serves the common good for its residents building strong communities by engaging people in philanthropy and developing a permanent endowment to provide resources now and for generations to come.

Philanthropy
11
Mitchell County Historical Society Inc

Operate the mitchell county museum to preserve the historical and cultural artifacts of mitchell county

Arts & Culture
12
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mcpherson College; the most unlike its peers is Birger Sandzen Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $251,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCANTON TOWNSHIP CARNEGIE LIBRARY: $80,000 · OtherCANTON TOWNSHIP CARNEGIE LIBRARYLINDSBORG CHILD DVL CTR TUITION FND: $50,000 · OtherLINDSBORG CHILD DVL CTR TUITION FNDCITY OF MCPHERSON KS: $50,000 · OtherCITY OF MCPHERSON KSMCPHERSON BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES: $30,000 · OtherMOUNDRIDGE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $30,000 · OtherMCPHERSON COMMUNITY THEATER: $25,000 · OtherMCPHERSON VALLEY UPLANDS LRNING CTR: $25,000 · OtherCANTON TOWNSHIP CARNEGI LIBRARY: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherCENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF KANSAS: $181,000 · EducationCENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF K…MCPHERSON COLLEGE: $150,000 · EducationMCPHERSON COLLEGEBETHANY COLLEGE: $140,000 · EducationBETHANY COLLEGEMCPHERSON OPERA HOUSE COMPANY: $345,000 · Arts & CultureMCPHERSON OPERA HOUSE COMP…McPherson Museum & Arts Foundation: $50,200 · Arts & CultureMcPherson Museum & Arts Fo…+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMcPherson Healthcare Foundation Inc: $200,000 · HealthMcPherson Heal…Mercy Hospital Inc: $20,000 · HealthMercy Hospital…THE CEDARS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCENTRAL KANSAS CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$566,800Education$471,000Arts & Culture$405,200Health$220,000Human Services$50,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMCPHERSON OPERA HOUSE COMPANY: $345,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetMcPherson Healthcare Foundation Inc: $200,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetCENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF KANSAS: $181,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE: $140,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMcPherson Museum & Arts Foundation: $50,200 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE CEDARS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMercy Hospital Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBIRGER SANDZEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MCPHERSON OPERA HOUSE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds McPherson Healthcare Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF KANSAS ↗
  • Who funds MCPHERSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds McPherson Museum & Arts Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE CEDARS INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL KANSAS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRGER SANDZEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

McPherson County Community FoundationKS24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: McPherson County Community Foundation · Saint Stephen's of Kansas Charitable Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Julia J Mingenback Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Julia J Mingenback Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Julia J Mingenback Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Julia J Mingenback Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Julia J Mingenback’s filings →

    More from the funding graph